BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

102 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27155763)

  • 1. An automated electronic system for managing radiation treatment plan peer review reduces missed reviews at a large, high-volume academic center.
    Gabriel PE; Woodhouse KD; Lin A; Finlay JC; Young RB; Volz E; Hahn SM; Metz JM; Maity A
    Pract Radiat Oncol; 2016; 6(6):e307-e314. PubMed ID: 27155763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Assessing the Quality of a Radiation Oncology Case-Based, Peer-Review Program in an Integrated Academic and Community Cancer Center Network.
    Thaker NG; Sturdevant L; Jhingran A; Das P; Delclos ME; Gunn GB; McAleer MF; Tereffe W; Choi SL; Frank SJ; Simeone WJ; Martinez W; Hahn SM; Famiglietti R; Kuban DA
    J Oncol Pract; 2016 Apr; 12(4):e476-86. PubMed ID: 26931402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Directly Improving the Quality of Radiation Treatment Through Peer Review: A Cross-sectional Analysis of Cancer Centers Across a Provincial Cancer Program.
    Rouette J; Gutierrez E; O'Donnell J; Reddeman L; Hart M; Foxcroft S; Mitera G; Warde P; Brundage MD; ;
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2017 Jul; 98(3):521-529. PubMed ID: 28258891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Quality assurance peer review chart rounds in 2011: a survey of academic institutions in the United States.
    Lawrence YR; Whiton MA; Symon Z; Wuthrick EJ; Doyle L; Harrison AS; Dicker AP
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2012 Nov; 84(3):590-5. PubMed ID: 22445006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Impact of quality assurance rounds in a Canadian radiation therapy department.
    Lefresne S; Olivotto IA; Joe H; Blood PA; Olson RA
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2013 Mar; 85(3):e117-21. PubMed ID: 23195781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Radiologist Peer Review by Group Consensus.
    Harvey HB; Alkasab TK; Prabhakar AM; Halpern EF; Rosenthal DI; Pandharipande PV; Gazelle GS
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2016 Jun; 13(6):656-62. PubMed ID: 26908200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A Prospective Analysis of Radiation Oncologist Compliance With Early Peer Review Recommendations.
    Walburn T; Wang K; Sud S; Zakrzewski A; Roehm R; Sutton S; Tan X; Adams R; Mazur L; Marks LB; Chera BS
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2019 Jul; 104(3):494-500. PubMed ID: 30807823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. 100% peer review in radiation oncology: is it feasible?
    Martin-Garcia E; Celada-Álvarez F; Pérez-Calatayud MJ; Rodriguez-Pla M; Prato-Carreño O; Farga-Albiol D; Pons-Llanas O; Roldán-Ortega S; Collado-Ballesteros E; Martinez-Arcelus FJ; Bernisz-Diaz Y; Macias VA; Chimeno J; Gimeno-Olmos J; Lliso F; Carmona V; Ruiz JC; Pérez-Calatayud J; Tormo-Micó A; Conde-Moreno AJ
    Clin Transl Oncol; 2020 Dec; 22(12):2341-2349. PubMed ID: 32557395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A medical staff peer review system in a public teaching hospital--an internal quality improvement tool.
    Chan LS; Elabiad M; Zheng L; Wagman B; Low G; Chang R; Testa N; Hall SL
    J Healthc Qual; 2014; 36(1):37-44. PubMed ID: 22646743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Prospective peer review quality assurance for outpatient radiation therapy.
    Ballo MT; Chronowski GM; Schlembach PJ; Bloom ES; Arzu IY; Kuban DA
    Pract Radiat Oncol; 2014; 4(5):279-284. PubMed ID: 25194094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Impact of a real-time peer review audit on patient management in a radiation oncology department.
    Boxer M; Forstner D; Kneebone A; Delaney G; Koh ES; Fuller M; Kaadan N
    J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol; 2009 Aug; 53(4):405-11. PubMed ID: 19695048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluation of a mandatory quality assurance data capture in anesthesia: a secure electronic system to capture quality assurance information linked to an automated anesthesia record.
    Peterfreund RA; Driscoll WD; Walsh JL; Subramanian A; Anupama S; Weaver M; Morris T; Arnholz S; Zheng H; Pierce ET; Spring SF
    Anesth Analg; 2011 May; 112(5):1218-25. PubMed ID: 21415434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evidence-based Peer Review for Radiation Therapy - Updated Review of the Literature with a Focus on Tumour Subsite and Treatment Modality.
    Huo M; Gorayski P; Poulsen M; Thompson K; Pinkham MB
    Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol); 2017 Oct; 29(10):680-688. PubMed ID: 28528679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Implementation and Efficacy of a Large-Scale Radiation Oncology Case-Based Peer-Review Quality Program across a Multinational Cancer Network.
    Ludmir EB; Hoffman KE; Jhingran A; Kouzy R; Ip MP; Sturdevant L; Ning MS; Minsky BD; McAleer MF; Chronowski GM; Arzu IY; Reed VK; Garg AK; Roberts T; Eastwick GA; Olson MR; Selek U; Gabel M; Koong AC; Kupferman ME; Kuban DA
    Pract Radiat Oncol; 2024; 14(3):e173-e179. PubMed ID: 38176466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Impact of an electronic health record operating room management system in ophthalmology on documentation time, surgical volume, and staffing.
    Sanders DS; Read-Brown S; Tu DC; Lambert WE; Choi D; Almario BM; Yackel TR; Brown AS; Chiang MF
    JAMA Ophthalmol; 2014 May; 132(5):586-92. PubMed ID: 24676217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The quality of paper-based versus electronic nursing care plan in Australian aged care homes: A documentation audit study.
    Wang N; Yu P; Hailey D
    Int J Med Inform; 2015 Aug; 84(8):561-9. PubMed ID: 26004340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Improving the Quality of Radiation Treatment for Patients in Ontario: Increasing Peer Review Activities on a Jurisdictional Level Using a Change Management Approach.
    Reddeman L; Foxcroft S; Gutierrez E; Hart M; Lockhart E; Mendelsohn M; Ang M; Sharpe M; Warde P; Brundage M; Reddeman L; Foxcroft S; Gutierrez E; Hart M; Lockhart E; Mendelsohn M; Ang M; Sharpe M; Warde P; Brundage M
    J Oncol Pract; 2016 Jan; 12(1):81-2, e61-70. PubMed ID: 26759471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The complementary nature of peer review and quality assurance data collection.
    Brook OR; Romero J; Brook A; Kruskal JB; Yam CS; Levine D
    Radiology; 2015 Jan; 274(1):221-9. PubMed ID: 25188432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Detailed prospective peer review in a community radiation oncology clinic.
    Mitchell JD; Chesnut TJ; Eastham DV; Demandante CN; Hoopes DJ
    Pract Radiat Oncol; 2017; 7(1):50-56. PubMed ID: 27720701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Automation and intensity modulated radiation therapy for individualized high-quality tangent breast treatment plans.
    Purdie TG; Dinniwell RE; Fyles A; Sharpe MB
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2014 Nov; 90(3):688-95. PubMed ID: 25160607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.