These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27155904)

  • 1. Caesarean section surgical techniques: all equally safe.
    Temmerman M
    Lancet; 2016 Jul; 388(10039):8-9. PubMed ID: 27155904
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Caesarean section surgical techniques: 3 year follow-up of the CORONIS fractional, factorial, unmasked, randomised controlled trial.
    ; Abalos E; Addo V; Brocklehurst P; El Sheikh M; Farrell B; Gray S; Hardy P; Juszczak E; Mathews JE; Naz Masood S; Oyarzun E; Oyieke J; Sharma JB; Spark P
    Lancet; 2016 Jul; 388(10039):62-72. PubMed ID: 27155903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Reply: To PMID 24912096.
    Bujold E; Roberge S
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Jun; 212(6):829-30. PubMed ID: 25582102
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Single- vs double-layer and locking vs nonlocking closure of uterus: missing woods for the trees?
    Sholapurkar SL
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Jun; 212(6):829. PubMed ID: 25582100
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A new technique for closure of the uterus at caesarean section.
    Sivasuriya M; Sriskanthan R; Sriskandarajah MN
    Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 1988 May; 28(2):96-8. PubMed ID: 3265871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [A surgical technic for cesarean section and gynecological laparotomy without suturing of the parietal and visceral peritoneum and the single-layer suturing of the uterus during the section (a review of the literature and initial experience)].
    Katsulov A; Iankov M; Bobchev T
    Akush Ginekol (Sofiia); 1998; 37(4):40-6. PubMed ID: 10360054
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Peritoneal closure or non-closure at caesarean section.
    van Bogaert LJ; Misra A
    J Obstet Gynaecol; 2009 Apr; 29(3):217-9. PubMed ID: 19358028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Non-closure versus closure of peritoneum during cesarean section: a randomized study.
    Zareian Z; Zareian P
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2006; 128(1-2):267-9. PubMed ID: 16716491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Extraperitoneal lower segment caesarean section for infected cases. A reappraisal.
    Mokgokong ET; Crichton D
    S Afr Med J; 1974 Apr; 48(18):788-90. PubMed ID: 4596724
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Caesarean section: closure or non-closure of peritoneum? A randomized trial of postoperative morbidity].
    Huchon C; Raiffort C; Chis C; Messaoudi F; Jacquemot MC; Panel P
    Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2005 Oct; 33(10):745-9. PubMed ID: 16154376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Uterine incision closure at caesarean section: a randomised comparative study of intraperitoneal closure and closure after temporary exteriorisation.
    Ezechi OC; Kalu BK; Njokanma FO; Nwokoro CA; Okeke GC
    West Afr J Med; 2005; 24(1):41-3. PubMed ID: 15909709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A randomized controlled study of peritoneal closure at cesarean section.
    Galaal KA; Krolikowski A
    Saudi Med J; 2000 Aug; 21(8):759-61. PubMed ID: 11423890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Should the visceral peritoneum at the bladder flap closed at cesarean sections? A post-partum sonographic and clinical assessment.
    Malvasi A; Tinelli A; Guido M; Zizza A; Farine D; Stark M
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2010 Jul; 23(7):662-9. PubMed ID: 20540660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Non-closure of peritoneal surfaces at caesarean section--a systematic review.
    Bamigboye AA; Hofmeyr GJ
    S Afr Med J; 2005 Feb; 95(2):123-6. PubMed ID: 15751208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Peritoneal closure or non-closure at cesarean.
    Pietrantoni M; Parsons MT; O'Brien WF; Collins E; Knuppel RA; Spellacy WN
    Obstet Gynecol; 1991 Feb; 77(2):293-6. PubMed ID: 1988896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [A modified Sarafoff suture for closure of the uterine wound in Cesarean section].
    Müller R; Köhler R; Schultze H; Wolansky D
    Zentralbl Gynakol; 1990; 112(13):803-9. PubMed ID: 2238982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Two cases of significant postoperative morbidity following peritoneal non-closure at caesarean section.
    Owen R; Polson D
    J Obstet Gynaecol; 2009 Jan; 29(1):65-6. PubMed ID: 19280506
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. COMPARISON OF PERITONEAL CLOSURE VERSUS NON-CLOSURE DURING CAESAREAN SECTION.
    Takreem A
    J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad; 2015; 27(1):78-80. PubMed ID: 26182743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A randomised controlled study of non-closure of peritoneum at caesarean section in a Nigerian population.
    Malomo OO; Kuti O; Orji EO; Ogunniyi SO; Sule SS
    J Obstet Gynaecol; 2006 Jul; 26(5):429-32. PubMed ID: 16846869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Parietal peritoneal closure versus non-closure at caesarean section: which technique is feasible to perform?
    Altinbas SK; Cenksoy P; Tapisiz OL; Beydilli G; Yirci B; Ercan Ö; Dede S; Kandemir O
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2013 Jul; 26(11):1128-31. PubMed ID: 23350686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.