221 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27156000)
1. Clinical performance during 48 months of two current glass ionomer restorative systems with coatings: a randomized clinical trial in the field.
Klinke T; Daboul A; Turek A; Frankenberger R; Hickel R; Biffar R
Trials; 2016 May; 17(1):239. PubMed ID: 27156000
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A 3-year controlled randomized clinical study on the performance of two glass-ionomer cements in Class II cavities of permanent teeth.
Fotiadou C; Frasheri I; Reymus M; Diegritz C; Kessler A; Manhart J; Hickel R; Klinke T; Heck K
Quintessence Int; 2019; 50(8):592-602. PubMed ID: 31286115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Six-year results of a randomized controlled clinical trial of two glass ionomer cements in class II cavities.
Heck K; Frasheri I; Diegritz C; Manhart J; Hickel R; Fotiadou C
J Dent; 2020 Jun; 97():103333. PubMed ID: 32305380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Clinical investigation of two glass-ionomer restoratives used with the atraumatic restorative treatment approach in China: two-years results.
Lo EC; Luo Y; Fan MW; Wei SH
Caries Res; 2001; 35(6):458-63. PubMed ID: 11799287
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparative evaluation of shear bond strength and microleakage of tricalcium silicate-based restorative material and radioopaque posterior glass ionomer restorative cement in primary and permanent teeth: an in vitro study.
Raju VG; Venumbaka NR; Mungara J; Vijayakumar P; Rajendran S; Elangovan A
J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2014; 32(4):304-10. PubMed ID: 25231038
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Corrigendum: A 3-year controlled randomized clinical study on the performance of two glass-ionomer cements in Class II cavities of permanent teeth.
Fotiadou C; Frasheri I; Reymus M; Diegritz C; Kessler A; Manhart J; Hickel R; Klinke T; Heck K
Quintessence Int; 2019 Dec; 51(1):e1-e11. PubMed ID: 31813942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A randomized, prospective clinical study evaluating effectiveness of a bulk-fill composite resin, a conventional composite resin and a reinforced glass ionomer in Class II cavities: one-year results.
Balkaya H; Arslan S; Pala K
J Appl Oral Sci; 2019; 27():e20180678. PubMed ID: 31596369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Clinical performance of a glass ionomer restorative system: a 6-year evaluation.
Gurgan S; Kutuk ZB; Ergin E; Oztas SS; Cakir FY
Clin Oral Investig; 2017 Sep; 21(7):2335-2343. PubMed ID: 28000039
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Four-year randomized clinical trial to evaluate the clinical performance of a glass ionomer restorative system.
Gurgan S; Kutuk ZB; Ergin E; Oztas SS; Cakir FY
Oper Dent; 2015; 40(2):134-43. PubMed ID: 25299703
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of atraumatic restorative treatment and conventional restorative procedures in a hospital clinic: evaluation after 30 months.
Gao W; Peng D; Smales RJ; Yip KH
Quintessence Int; 2003 Jan; 34(1):31-7. PubMed ID: 12674356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Tooth-colored filling materials for the restoration of cervical lesions: a 24-month follow-up study.
Folwaczny M; Loher C; Mehl A; Kunzelmann KH; Hinkel R
Oper Dent; 2000; 25(4):251-8. PubMed ID: 11203827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Clinical investigation of a high-strength glass ionomer restorative used with the ART technique in Wuhan, China: one-year results.
Luo Y; Wei SH; Fan MW; Lo EC
Chin J Dent Res; 1999 Dec; 2(3-4):73-8. PubMed ID: 10863422
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A clinical evaluation of two glass ionomer cements in primary molars using atraumatic restorative treatment technique in India: 1 year follow up.
Deepa G; Shobha T
Int J Paediatr Dent; 2010 Nov; 20(6):410-8. PubMed ID: 20642467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Systematic review on highly viscous glass-ionomer cement/resin coating restorations (Part II):
Do they merge Minamata Convention and minimum intervention dentistry?
Kielbassa AM; Glockner G; Wolgin M; Glockner K
Quintessence Int; 2017; 48(1):9-18. PubMed ID: 28054040
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Randomized clinical trial of two resin-modified glass ionomer materials: 1-year results.
Perdigão J; Dutra-Corrêa M; Saraceni SH; Ciaramicoli MT; Kiyan VH
Oper Dent; 2012; 37(6):591-601. PubMed ID: 22770485
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Survival of Fuji IX ART fillings in permanent teeth of primary school children in Tanzania.
Kikwilu EN; Mandari GJ; Honkala E
East Afr Med J; 2001 Aug; 78(8):411-3. PubMed ID: 11921563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Clinical performance of a glass-hybrid system in comparison with a resin composite in two-surface class II restorations: a 5-year randomised multi-centre study.
Miletić I; Baraba A; Krmek SJ; Perić T; Marković D; Basso M; Ozkaya CA; Kemaloglu H; Turkun LS
Clin Oral Investig; 2024 Jan; 28(1):104. PubMed ID: 38243032
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A Prospective Six-Year Clinical Study Evaluating Reinforced Glass Ionomer Cements with Resin Coating on Posterior Teeth: Quo Vadis?
Türkün LS; Kanik Ö
Oper Dent; 2016; 41(6):587-598. PubMed ID: 27571238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Two-year clinical study on postoperative pulpal complications arising from the absence of a glass-ionomer lining in deep occlusal resin-composite restorations.
Banomyong D; Messer H
J Investig Clin Dent; 2013 Nov; 4(4):265-70. PubMed ID: 23355492
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Five-year randomized clinical trial to evaluate the clinical performance of high-viscosity glass ionomer restorative systems in small class II restorations.
Wafaie RA; Ibrahim Ali A; El-Negoly SAE; Mahmoud SH
J Esthet Restor Dent; 2023 Apr; 35(3):538-555. PubMed ID: 36564970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
