These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

393 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27156056)

  • 1. The functional subdivision of the visual brain: Is there a real illusion effect on action? A multi-lab replication study.
    Kopiske KK; Bruno N; Hesse C; Schenk T; Franz VH
    Cortex; 2016 Jun; 79():130-52. PubMed ID: 27156056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Grasp effects of the Ebbinghaus illusion: obstacle avoidance is not the explanation.
    Franz VH; Bülthoff HH; Fahle M
    Exp Brain Res; 2003 Apr; 149(4):470-7. PubMed ID: 12677327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The Uznadze illusion reveals similar effects of relative size on perception and action.
    Uccelli S; Pisu V; Riggio L; Bruno N
    Exp Brain Res; 2019 Apr; 237(4):953-965. PubMed ID: 30683958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A temporal analysis of grasping in the Ebbinghaus illusion: planning versus online control.
    Danckert JA; Sharif N; Haffenden AM; Schiff KC; Goodale MA
    Exp Brain Res; 2002 May; 144(2):275-80. PubMed ID: 12012166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Grasp effects of the Ebbinghaus illusion are ambiguous.
    Gilster R; Kuhtz-Buschbeck JP; Wiesner CD; Ferstl R
    Exp Brain Res; 2006 May; 171(3):416-20. PubMed ID: 16710685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effects of the Ebbinghaus illusion on different behaviors: one- and two-handed grasping; one- and two-handed manual estimation; metric and comparative judgment.
    Vishton PM; Fabre E
    Spat Vis; 2003; 16(3-4):377-92. PubMed ID: 12858958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Grasping visual illusions: consistent data and no dissociation.
    Franz VH; Gegenfurtner KR
    Cogn Neuropsychol; 2008; 25(7-8):920-50. PubMed ID: 19378412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. When is grasping affected by the Müller-Lyer illusion? A quantitative review.
    Bruno N; Franz VH
    Neuropsychologia; 2009 May; 47(6):1421-33. PubMed ID: 19059422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Dual processes underlie the effect of the Ebbinghaüs illusion on control of grasping.
    Chen Z; Zhang N; Saunders JA
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2021 Nov; 47(11):1472-1492. PubMed ID: 34843356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The Sander parallelogram illusion dissociates action and perception despite control for the litany of past confounds.
    Whitwell RL; Goodale MA; Merritt KE; Enns JT
    Cortex; 2018 Jan; 98():163-176. PubMed ID: 29100659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Consistency in exchange for inappropriately matched visual feedback? A comment on Franz and Gegenfurtner (2008) "Grasping visual illusions: consistent data and no dissociation".
    Stöttinger E; Perner J
    Cogn Neuropsychol; 2009 Jun; 26(4):412-7. PubMed ID: 19672734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Visuomotor 'immunity' to perceptual illusion: a mismatch of attentional demands cannot explain the perception-action dissociation.
    Dewar MT; Carey DP
    Neuropsychologia; 2006; 44(8):1501-8. PubMed ID: 16364378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Another look at the Müller-Lyer illusion: different gaze patterns in vision for action and perception.
    van Doorn H; van der Kamp J; de Wit M; Savelsbergh GJ
    Neuropsychologia; 2009 Feb; 47(3):804-12. PubMed ID: 19118565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Visual illusions, delayed grasping, and memory: no shift from dorsal to ventral control.
    Franz VH; Hesse C; Kollath S
    Neuropsychologia; 2009 May; 47(6):1518-31. PubMed ID: 18834894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Action rules: why the visual control of reaching and grasping is not always influenced by perceptual illusions.
    Goodale MA; Gonzalez CL; Króliczak G
    Perception; 2008; 37(3):355-66. PubMed ID: 18491713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The effect of the Ebbinghaus illusion on grasping behaviour of children.
    Hanisch C; Konczak J; Dohle C
    Exp Brain Res; 2001 Mar; 137(2):237-45. PubMed ID: 11315553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effects of the Ebbinghaus illusion on children's perception and grasping.
    Duemmler T; Franz VH; Jovanovic B; Schwarzer G
    Exp Brain Res; 2008 Mar; 186(2):249-60. PubMed ID: 18057923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Are perception and action affected differently by the Titchener circles illusion?
    Pavani F; Boscagli I; Benvenuti F; Rabuffetti M; Farnè A
    Exp Brain Res; 1999 Jul; 127(1):95-101. PubMed ID: 10424418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Action without perception in human vision.
    Goodale MA
    Cogn Neuropsychol; 2008; 25(7-8):891-919. PubMed ID: 18608333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Grasping visual illusions: no evidence for a dissociation between perception and action.
    Franz VH; Gegenfurtner KR; Bülthoff HH; Fahle M
    Psychol Sci; 2000 Jan; 11(1):20-5. PubMed ID: 11228838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 20.