These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

118 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 271565)

  • 1. Re-inforcement of amalgam. 1: Effect of pin orientation, type, and number on the tensile strength of amalgam.
    el-Bahloul AN
    Egypt Dent J; 1977 Apr; 23(2):99-110. PubMed ID: 271565
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Optimized pin geometry for improved retention of parapulpal pins in amalgam].
    Neumeyer S; Gernet W; Bötsch H
    Dtsch Zahnarztl Z; 1991 Aug; 46(8):550-2. PubMed ID: 1817928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Re-inforcement of amalgam. Part II: the relative stapling potential of certain embedded metal configurations.
    el-Bahloul AN
    Egypt Dent J; 1977 Oct; 23(4):95-109. PubMed ID: 283929
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The effect of cross-sectional area on transverse strength of Amalgapin-retained restorations.
    Certosimo AJ; House RC; Anderson MH
    Oper Dent; 1991; 16(2):70-6. PubMed ID: 1803331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Fracture resistance of four core materials with incorporated pins.
    Kao EC; Hart S; Johnston WM
    Int J Prosthodont; 1989; 2(6):569-78. PubMed ID: 2701071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Retention of threaded pins in amalgam.
    Podshadley AG
    J Prosthet Dent; 1990 Jan; 63(1):47-51. PubMed ID: 2404107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Rationale for pin-retained amalgam restorations.
    Collard EW; Caputo AA; Standlee JP
    Dent Clin North Am; 1970 Jan; 14(1):43-51. PubMed ID: 5262043
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effects of three types of pins on compressive strength of dental amalgam.
    Duperon DF; Kasloff Z
    J Can Dent Assoc (Tor); 1971 Nov; 37(11):422-8. PubMed ID: 5288885
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A photoelastic study of stress concentrations produced by retention pins in amalgam restorations.
    Dhuru VB; McLachlan K; Kasloff Z
    J Dent Res; 1979 Mar; 58(3):1060-4. PubMed ID: 370168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Tensile resistance of complete cast crowns cemented on amalgam foundations retained by amalgapins.
    de Andrade CA; Monteiro Júnior S; Baratieri LN
    Quintessence Int; 1991 Aug; 22(8):617-21. PubMed ID: 1882055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Strength of amalgam restorations bonded with Amalgambond.
    Ianzano JA; Mastrodomenico J; Gwinnett AJ
    Am J Dent; 1993 Feb; 6(1):10-2. PubMed ID: 8329154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The effects of three types of pins on the tensile strength of dental amalgam.
    Duperon DF; Kasloff Z
    J Can Dent Assoc (Tor); 1973 Feb; 39(2):111-9. PubMed ID: 4510580
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Dentinal retention of pin-retaining devices.
    Hembree JH
    Gen Dent; 1981; 29(5):420-2. PubMed ID: 6955240
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Channel depth and diameter: effects on transverse strength of amalgapin-retained restorations.
    Roddy WC; Blank LW; Rupp NW; Pelleu GB
    Oper Dent; 1987; 12(1):2-9. PubMed ID: 3469624
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Fracture strength of amalgam crowns with repaired endodontic access.
    Hachmeister KA; Dunn WJ; Murchison DF; Larsen RB
    Oper Dent; 2002; 27(3):254-8. PubMed ID: 12022456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Pin-retained base in conjunction with complex pin-and-amalgam restoration.
    Murray RR
    Oper Dent; 1985; 10(2):58-60. PubMed ID: 3862079
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The pin-amalgam restoration. Part 1. A review.
    Evans JR; Wetz JH
    J Prosthet Dent; 1977 Jan; 37(1):37-41. PubMed ID: 318695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Amalgam buildups: shear strength and dentin sealing properties.
    Pashley EL; Comer RW; Parry EE; Pashley DH
    Oper Dent; 1991; 16(3):82-9. PubMed ID: 1803337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Cuspal fracture with conventional Class II amalgam.
    Davis MW
    Dent Today; 1998 Dec; 17(12):42-4, 46-9. PubMed ID: 10752390
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effect of restoration size on fracture resistance of bonded amalgam restorations.
    Lindemuth JS; Hagge MS; Broome JS
    Oper Dent; 2000; 25(3):177-81. PubMed ID: 11203813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.