These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

216 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27156716)

  • 1. Division of focal plane polarimeter-based 3 × 4 Mueller matrix microscope: a potential tool for quick diagnosis of human carcinoma tissues.
    Chang J; He H; Wang Y; Huang Y; Li X; He C; Liao R; Zeng N; Liu S; Ma H
    J Biomed Opt; 2016 May; 21(5):56002. PubMed ID: 27156716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Differentiating characteristic microstructural features of cancerous tissues using Mueller matrix microscope.
    Wang Y; He H; Chang J; Zeng N; Liu S; Li M; Ma H
    Micron; 2015 Dec; 79():8-15. PubMed ID: 26280279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Characterization and classification of ductal carcinoma tissue using four channel based stokes-mueller polarimetry and machine learning.
    Ku S; Kaniyala Melanthota S; U R; Rai S; Mahato KK; Mazumder N
    Lasers Med Sci; 2024 May; 39(1):123. PubMed ID: 38703302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Polarization-resolved Stokes-Mueller imaging: a review of technology and applications.
    K U S; Mahato KK; Mazumder N
    Lasers Med Sci; 2019 Sep; 34(7):1283-1293. PubMed ID: 30830559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Differential Mueller matrix imaging of partially depolarizing optically anisotropic biological tissues.
    Trifonyuk L; Sdobnov A; Baranowski W; Ushenko V; Olar O; Dubolazov A; Pidkamin L; Sidor M; Vanchuliak O; Motrich A; Gorsky M; Meglinski I
    Lasers Med Sci; 2020 Jun; 35(4):877-891. PubMed ID: 31749042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Fast Mueller matrix microscope based on dual DoFP polarimeters.
    Huang T; Meng R; Qi J; Liu Y; Wang X; Chen Y; Liao R; Ma H
    Opt Lett; 2021 Apr; 46(7):1676-1679. PubMed ID: 33793516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Dual division of focal plane polarimeters-based collinear reflection Mueller matrix fast imaging microscope.
    Huang T; Meng R; Song J; Bu T; Zhu Y; Li M; Liao R; Ma H
    J Biomed Opt; 2022 Aug; 27(8):. PubMed ID: 35996215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Modulus design multiwavelength polarization microscope for transmission Mueller matrix imaging.
    Zhou J; He H; Chen Z; Wang Y; Ma H
    J Biomed Opt; 2018 Jan; 23(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 29313323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Rapid Mueller matrix polarimetry based on parallelized polarization state generation and detection.
    Tripathi S; Toussaint KC
    Opt Express; 2009 Nov; 17(24):21396-407. PubMed ID: 19997379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Characterization of Mueller matrix elements for classifying human skin cancer utilizing random forest algorithm.
    Luu NT; Le TH; Phan QH; Pham TT
    J Biomed Opt; 2021 Jul; 26(7):. PubMed ID: 34227277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Anisotropic contrast optical microscope.
    Peev D; Hofmann T; Kananizadeh N; Beeram S; Rodriguez E; Wimer S; Rodenhausen KB; Herzinger CM; Kasputis T; Pfaunmiller E; Nguyen A; Korlacki R; Pannier A; Li Y; Schubert E; Hage D; Schubert M
    Rev Sci Instrum; 2016 Nov; 87(11):113701. PubMed ID: 27910407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Calibration methods for division-of-focal-plane polarimeters.
    Powell SB; Gruev V
    Opt Express; 2013 Sep; 21(18):21039-55. PubMed ID: 24103976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Optimum selection of input polarization states in determining the sample Mueller matrix: a dual photoelastic polarimeter approach.
    Layden D; Wood MF; Vitkin IA
    Opt Express; 2012 Aug; 20(18):20466-81. PubMed ID: 23037095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Temporal and spatial error model for estimating the measurement precision of the division of focal plane polarimeters.
    Yang J; Qiu S; Jin W; Xue F
    Opt Express; 2021 Jun; 29(13):20808-20828. PubMed ID: 34266162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Quantitatively characterizing the microstructural features of breast ductal carcinoma tissues in different progression stages by Mueller matrix microscope.
    Dong Y; Qi J; He H; He C; Liu S; Wu J; Elson DS; Ma H
    Biomed Opt Express; 2017 Aug; 8(8):3643-3655. PubMed ID: 28856041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Demosaicking DoFP images using Newton's polynomial interpolation and polarization difference model.
    Li N; Zhao Y; Pan Q; Kong SG
    Opt Express; 2019 Jan; 27(2):1376-1391. PubMed ID: 30696204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Probing microstructural information of anisotropic scattering media using rotation-independent polarization parameters.
    Sun M; He H; Zeng N; Du E; Guo Y; Peng C; He Y; Ma H
    Appl Opt; 2014 May; 53(14):2949-55. PubMed ID: 24922012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Creep Monitoring of Submersible Observation Windows Using Mueller Matrix Imaging.
    Tu H; Bu X; Liao R; Zhang H; Ma G; Li H; Wan J; Ma H
    Materials (Basel); 2023 Jun; 16(13):. PubMed ID: 37445047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Analyzing the Influence of Imaging Resolution on Polarization Properties of Scattering Media Obtained From Mueller Matrix.
    Shao C; Chen B; He H; He C; Shen Y; Zhai H; Ma H
    Front Chem; 2022; 10():936255. PubMed ID: 35903191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Digital histology with Mueller microscopy: how to mitigate an impact of tissue cut thickness fluctuations.
    Lee HR; Li P; Yoo TSH; Lotz C; Groeber-Becker FK; Dembski S; Garcia-Caurel E; Ossikovski R; Ma H; Novikova T
    J Biomed Opt; 2019 Jul; 24(7):1-9. PubMed ID: 31347339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.