These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

212 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27157599)

  • 1. Technique to verify the accuracy of a definitive cast before the fabrication of a fixed dental prosthesis.
    Farah RI; Alshabi AM
    J Prosthet Dent; 2016 Sep; 116(3):325-7. PubMed ID: 27157599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effect of dental technician disparities on the 3-dimensional accuracy of definitive casts.
    Emir F; Piskin B; Sipahi C
    J Prosthet Dent; 2017 Mar; 117(3):410-418. PubMed ID: 27677213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of accuracy and reproducibility of casts made by digital and conventional methods.
    Cho SH; Schaefer O; Thompson GA; Guentsch A
    J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Apr; 113(4):310-5. PubMed ID: 25682531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effect of implant divergence on the accuracy of definitive casts created from traditional and digital implant-level impressions: an in vitro comparative study.
    Lin WS; Harris BT; Elathamna EN; Abdel-Azim T; Morton D
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2015; 30(1):102-9. PubMed ID: 25615919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Scanning of root canal impression for the fabrication of a resin CAD-CAM-customized post-and-core.
    Falcão Spina DR; da Costa RG; Correr GM; Rached RN
    J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Aug; 120(2):242-245. PubMed ID: 29475760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A technique for verifying and correcting a milled polyurethane definitive cast for nonsegmental implant restoration in an edentulous jaw.
    Lin WS; Harris BT; Metz MJ; Morton D
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Sep; 112(3):658-62. PubMed ID: 24836533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Use of a bite registration vinyl polysiloxane material to identify denture flange overextension and/or excessive border thickness in removable prosthodontics.
    Haeberle CB; Abreu A; Metzler K
    Gen Dent; 2015; 63(3):e32-5. PubMed ID: 25945776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A technique to ensure the reproducibility of a cast post and core.
    Naas HM; Dashti MH; Hashemian R; Hifeda NY
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Dec; 112(6):1585-7. PubMed ID: 25156094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. 3D and 2D marginal fit of pressed and CAD/CAM lithium disilicate crowns made from digital and conventional impressions.
    Anadioti E; Aquilino SA; Gratton DG; Holloway JA; Denry I; Thomas GW; Qian F
    J Prosthodont; 2014 Dec; 23(8):610-7. PubMed ID: 24995593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluation of accuracy of casts of multiple internal connection implant prosthesis obtained from different impression materials and techniques: an in vitro study.
    Pujari M; Garg P; Prithviraj DR
    J Oral Implantol; 2014 Apr; 40(2):137-45. PubMed ID: 24456531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Simplified technique for refabrication of cast posts and cores.
    Sabbak SA
    J Prosthet Dent; 2000 Jun; 83(6):686-7. PubMed ID: 10842140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A comparison of the accuracy of polyether, polyvinyl siloxane, and plaster impressions for long-span implant-supported prostheses.
    Hoods-Moonsammy VJ; Owen P; Howes DG
    Int J Prosthodont; 2014; 27(5):433-8. PubMed ID: 25191885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Accuracy of impressions with different impression materials in angulated implants.
    Reddy S; Prasad K; Vakil H; Jain A; Chowdhary R
    Niger J Clin Pract; 2013; 16(3):279-84. PubMed ID: 23771446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Interocclusal record fabricated with bis-acrylic composite resin and vinyl polysiloxane registration material.
    Vivas JL; Sierraalta M
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Sep; 102(3):199-200. PubMed ID: 19703631
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Indirect fabrication of multiple post-and-core patterns with a vinyl polysiloxane matrix.
    Sabbak SA
    J Prosthet Dent; 2002 Nov; 88(5):555-7. PubMed ID: 12474010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparative evaluation of the effects of implant position, impression material, and tray type on implant impression accuracy.
    Gökçen-Rohlig B; Ongül D; Sancakli E; Sermet B
    Implant Dent; 2014 Jun; 23(3):283-8. PubMed ID: 24844388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Modified indexing technique for the immediate interim restoration of a dental implant.
    Reis JM; Abi-Rached Fde O; Scardueli CR; Pinelli LA
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Aug; 112(2):369-72. PubMed ID: 24433838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. An indirect immediate-load prosthetic protocol using a novel-winged analog.
    Stumpel LJ
    Pract Proced Aesthet Dent; 2007 May; 19(4):225-31; quiz 232. PubMed ID: 17601330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Accurate transfer of soft tissue morphology with interim prosthesis to definitive cast.
    Noh K; Kwon KR; Kim HS; Kim DS; Pae A
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Feb; 111(2):159-62. PubMed ID: 24286639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparative study of the polyvinyl siloxane technique with resin-splinted transfer copings used for multiple implant abutment impressions.
    Ferreira VF; Barboza EP; Gouvêa CV; Bianchini GM; Mussallem F; Carvalho WR
    Implant Dent; 2012 Feb; 21(1):72-6. PubMed ID: 22214989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.