These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

204 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27157599)

  • 21. A functional open-tray impression technique for implant-retained overdenture prostheses.
    Ozcelik TB; Yilmaz B
    J Oral Implantol; 2012 Oct; 38(5):617-9. PubMed ID: 21651416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Accuracy of impressions and casts using different implant impression techniques in a multi-implant system with an internal hex connection.
    Wenz HJ; Hertrampf K
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(1):39-47. PubMed ID: 18416411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Strain gauges's analysis on implant-retained prosthesis' cast accuracy.
    Rodrigues MA; Luthi LF; Takahashi JM; Nobilo MA; Henriques GE
    Indian J Dent Res; 2014; 25(5):635-40. PubMed ID: 25511065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Polyvinylsiloxane dental impression material used to support the pinna after severe injury.
    Bell GW; Clark MH
    Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2004 Jun; 42(3):257-8. PubMed ID: 15121275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Accuracy and precision of occlusal contacts of stereolithographic casts mounted by digital interocclusal registrations.
    Krahenbuhl JT; Cho SH; Irelan J; Bansal NK
    J Prosthet Dent; 2016 Aug; 116(2):231-6. PubMed ID: 27068319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Indirectly formed matrix for multiple composite core restorations: two clinical treatments illustrating an expanded technique.
    Livaditis GJ
    J Prosthet Dent; 2002 Sep; 88(3):245-51. PubMed ID: 12426491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Accuracy of different impression techniques for internal-connection implants.
    Lee YJ; Heo SJ; Koak JY; Kim SK
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(5):823-30. PubMed ID: 19865622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Impression techniques and misfit-induced strains on implant-supported superstructures: an in vitro study.
    Cehreli MC; Akça K
    Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2006 Aug; 26(4):379-85. PubMed ID: 16939020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Evaluation of accuracy of multiple dental implant impressions using various splinting materials.
    Hariharan R; Shankar C; Rajan M; Baig MR; Azhagarasan NS
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010; 25(1):38-44. PubMed ID: 20209185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. A technique to transfer the contours of an interim implant restoration to the definitive cast.
    Yilmaz B
    J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Jun; 113(6):645-7. PubMed ID: 25799285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. A clinical comparison of two vinyl polysiloxane impression materials using the one-step technique.
    Raigrodski AJ; Dogan S; Mancl LA; Heindl H
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Sep; 102(3):179-86. PubMed ID: 19703625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Using vinyl polysiloxane in the altered cast procedure for speech-aid prostheses.
    Gardner LK; Rahn AO; Parr GR
    J Prosthet Dent; 1990 Jan; 63(1):62-4. PubMed ID: 2404110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. A combined direct dowel and indirect core technique.
    Mekayarajjananonth T; Kiat-amnuay S; Salinas TJ
    Quintessence Int; 2000 Jan; 31(1):19-23. PubMed ID: 11203901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Evaluation of the accuracy of implant-level impression techniques for internal-connection implant prostheses in parallel and divergent models.
    Choi JH; Lim YJ; Yim SH; Kim CW
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22(5):761-8. PubMed ID: 17974110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. A laboratory investigation of the accuracy of two impression techniques for single-tooth implants.
    Daoudi MF; Setchell DJ; Searson LJ
    Int J Prosthodont; 2001; 14(2):152-8. PubMed ID: 11843452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Accuracy of successive casts for full-arch fixed prostheses.
    Dounis KS; Dounis G; Ditmyer MM; Ziebert GJ
    Int J Prosthodont; 2010; 23(5):446-9. PubMed ID: 20859561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. An innovative impression technique for fabrication of a custom made ocular prosthesis.
    Tripuraneni SC; Vadapalli SB; Ravikiran P; Nirupama N
    Indian J Ophthalmol; 2015 Jun; 63(6):545-7. PubMed ID: 26265651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. A review of contemporary impression materials and techniques.
    Donovan TE; Chee WW
    Dent Clin North Am; 2004 Apr; 48(2):vi-vii, 445-70. PubMed ID: 15172610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Cast impression coping technique.
    Vasilakis GJ; Vasilakis MD
    Gen Dent; 2003; 51(1):48-50. PubMed ID: 15061334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. A quick esthetic remount cast for all-ceramic restorations.
    Hansen PA; Gist J
    J Prosthodont; 2010 Aug; 19(6):494-6. PubMed ID: 20456029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.