216 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27157883)
1. The role of prosody and context in sarcasm comprehension: Behavioral and fMRI evidence.
Matsui T; Nakamura T; Utsumi A; Sasaki AT; Koike T; Yoshida Y; Harada T; Tanabe HC; Sadato N
Neuropsychologia; 2016 Jul; 87():74-84. PubMed ID: 27157883
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Context-prosody interaction in sarcasm comprehension: A functional magnetic resonance imaging study.
Nakamura T; Matsui T; Utsumi A; Sumiya M; Nakagawa E; Sadato N
Neuropsychologia; 2022 Jun; 170():108213. PubMed ID: 35292338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Neural circuit of verbal humor comprehension in schizophrenia - an fMRI study.
Adamczyk P; Wyczesany M; Domagalik A; Daren A; Cepuch K; Błądziński P; Cechnicki A; Marek T
Neuroimage Clin; 2017; 15():525-540. PubMed ID: 28652967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Neural substrates of sarcasm: a functional magnetic-resonance imaging study.
Uchiyama H; Seki A; Kageyama H; Saito DN; Koeda T; Ohno K; Sadato N
Brain Res; 2006 Dec; 1124(1):100-10. PubMed ID: 17092490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Neural substrates of irony comprehension: A functional MRI study.
Shibata M; Toyomura A; Itoh H; Abe J
Brain Res; 2010 Jan; 1308():114-23. PubMed ID: 19853585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Emotional and temporal aspects of situation model processing during text comprehension: an event-related fMRI study.
Ferstl EC; Rinck M; von Cramon DY
J Cogn Neurosci; 2005 May; 17(5):724-39. PubMed ID: 15904540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. What you say versus how you say it: Comparing sentence comprehension and emotional prosody processing using fMRI.
Seydell-Greenwald A; Chambers CE; Ferrara K; Newport EL
Neuroimage; 2020 Apr; 209():116509. PubMed ID: 31899288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Towards a neural circuit model of verbal humor processing: an fMRI study of the neural substrates of incongruity detection and resolution.
Chan YC; Chou TL; Chen HC; Yeh YC; Lavallee JP; Liang KC; Chang KE
Neuroimage; 2013 Feb; 66():169-76. PubMed ID: 23103517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. What is the difference between irony and sarcasm? An fMRI study.
Filik R; Ţurcan A; Ralph-Nearman C; Pitiot A
Cortex; 2019 Jun; 115():112-122. PubMed ID: 30807881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Fronto-parietal network supports context-dependent speech comprehension.
Smirnov D; Glerean E; Lahnakoski JM; Salmi J; Jääskeläinen IP; Sams M; Nummenmaa L
Neuropsychologia; 2014 Oct; 63():293-303. PubMed ID: 25218167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Distinction between the literal and intended meanings of sentences: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study of metaphor and sarcasm.
Uchiyama HT; Saito DN; Tanabe HC; Harada T; Seki A; Ohno K; Koeda T; Sadato N
Cortex; 2012 May; 48(5):563-83. PubMed ID: 21333979
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The 5% difference: early sensory processing predicts sarcasm perception in schizophrenia and schizo-affective disorder.
Kantrowitz JT; Hoptman MJ; Leitman DI; Silipo G; Javitt DC
Psychol Med; 2014 Jan; 44(1):25-36. PubMed ID: 23611263
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Irony comprehension: social conceptual knowledge and emotional response.
Akimoto Y; Sugiura M; Yomogida Y; Miyauchi CM; Miyazawa S; Kawashima R
Hum Brain Mapp; 2014 Apr; 35(4):1167-78. PubMed ID: 23408440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. How context features modulate the involvement of the working memory system during discourse comprehension.
Yang X; Zhang X; Yang Y; Lin N
Neuropsychologia; 2018 Mar; 111():36-44. PubMed ID: 29339077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Fluency-dependent cortical activation associated with speech production and comprehension in second language learners.
Shimada K; Hirotani M; Yokokawa H; Yoshida H; Makita K; Yamazaki-Murase M; Tanabe HC; Sadato N
Neuroscience; 2015 Aug; 300():474-92. PubMed ID: 26026679
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The role of look-backs in the processing of written sarcasm.
Olkoniemi H; Johander E; Kaakinen JK
Mem Cognit; 2019 Jan; 47(1):87-105. PubMed ID: 30168095
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Differential influences of emotion, task, and novelty on brain regions underlying the processing of speech melody.
Ethofer T; Kreifelts B; Wiethoff S; Wolf J; Grodd W; Vuilleumier P; Wildgruber D
J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 Jul; 21(7):1255-68. PubMed ID: 18752404
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comprehension of degraded speech sounds with m-sequence modulation: an fMRI study.
Takeichi H; Koyama S; Terao A; Takeuchi F; Toyosawa Y; Murohashi H
Neuroimage; 2010 Feb; 49(3):2697-706. PubMed ID: 19878726
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Balancing Prediction and Sensory Input in Speech Comprehension: The Spatiotemporal Dynamics of Word Recognition in Context.
Klimovich-Gray A; Tyler LK; Randall B; Kocagoncu E; Devereux B; Marslen-Wilson WD
J Neurosci; 2019 Jan; 39(3):519-527. PubMed ID: 30459221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. FMRI study of emotional speech comprehension.
Beaucousin V; Lacheret A; Turbelin MR; Morel M; Mazoyer B; Tzourio-Mazoyer N
Cereb Cortex; 2007 Feb; 17(2):339-52. PubMed ID: 16525130
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
