These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27158531)
1. The use of the greater trochanter marker in the thigh segment model: implications for hip and knee frontal and transverse plane motion. Graci V; Salsich G J Sport Health Sci; 2016 Mar; 5(1):95-100. PubMed ID: 27158531 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Proximal placement of lateral thigh skin markers reduces soft tissue artefact during normal gait using the Conventional Gait Model. Cockcroft J; Louw Q; Baker R Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2016 Nov; 19(14):1497-504. PubMed ID: 26929983 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Hip joint kinematics and segment coordination variability according to pain and structural disease severity in hip osteoarthritis. Hall M; Fox A; Bonacci J; Metcalf BR; Pua YH; Diamond LE; Allison K; Wrigley TV; Bennell KL J Orthop Res; 2020 Aug; 38(8):1836-1844. PubMed ID: 31981236 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The efficacy of the floor-reaction ankle-foot orthosis in children with cerebral palsy. Rogozinski BM; Davids JR; Davis RB; Jameson GG; Blackhurst DW J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2009 Oct; 91(10):2440-7. PubMed ID: 19797580 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The influence of knee marker placement error on evaluation of gait kinematic parameters. Szczerbik E; Kalinowska M Acta Bioeng Biomech; 2011; 13(3):43-6. PubMed ID: 22098124 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A DYNAMIC VALGUS INDEX THAT COMBINES HIP AND KNEE ANGLES: ASSESSMENT OF UTILITY IN FEMALES WITH PATELLOFEMORAL PAIN. Scholtes SA; Salsich GB Int J Sports Phys Ther; 2017 Jun; 12(3):333-340. PubMed ID: 28593087 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effects of barbell back squat stance width on sagittal and frontal hip and knee kinetics. Lahti J; Hegyi A; Vigotsky AD; Ahtiainen JP Scand J Med Sci Sports; 2019 Jan; 29(1):44-54. PubMed ID: 30230052 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Hamstring extensibility and transverse plane knee control relationship in athletic women. Nyland J; Caborn DN; Shapiro R; Johnson DL; Fang H Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 1999; 7(4):257-61. PubMed ID: 10462218 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The influence of different pelvic technical marker sets upon hip kinematics during gait. Langley B; Page R; Greig M Gait Posture; 2019 Jun; 71():74-78. PubMed ID: 31015185 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Patellofemoral joint stress during running in females with and without patellofemoral pain. Wirtz AD; Willson JD; Kernozek TW; Hong DA Knee; 2012 Oct; 19(5):703-8. PubMed ID: 22000909 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Frontal plane biomechanics in males and females with and without patellofemoral pain. Nakagawa TH; Moriya ÉT; Maciel CD; Serrão AF Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2012 Sep; 44(9):1747-55. PubMed ID: 22460471 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Kinematics of high-heeled gait. Opila-Correia KA Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 1990 Apr; 71(5):304-9. PubMed ID: 2327881 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Pelvic and lower limb compensatory actions of subjects in an early stage of hip osteoarthritis. Watelain E; Dujardin F; Babier F; Dubois D; Allard P Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2001 Dec; 82(12):1705-11. PubMed ID: 11733886 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The impact of thigh and shank marker quantity on lower extremity kinematics using a constrained model. Slater AA; Hullfish TJ; Baxter JR BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2018 Nov; 19(1):399. PubMed ID: 30424811 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Can hip and knee kinematics be improved by eliminating thigh markers? Schulz BW; Kimmel WL Clin Biomech (Bristol); 2010 Aug; 25(7):687-92. PubMed ID: 20493599 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of distinctive gait variables using two different biomechanical models for knee joint kinematics in subjects with knee osteoarthritis and healthy controls. Krauss I; List R; Janssen P; Grau S; Horstmann T; Stacoff A Clin Biomech (Bristol); 2012 Mar; 27(3):281-6. PubMed ID: 22019299 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Modified conventional gait model vs. Six degrees of freedom model: A comparison of lower limb kinematics and associated error. Langley B; Jones A; Board T; Greig M Gait Posture; 2021 Sep; 89():1-6. PubMed ID: 34214865 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Shape-model scaled gait models can neglect segment markers without consequential change to inverse kinematics results. Bakke D; Besier T J Biomech; 2022 May; 137():111086. PubMed ID: 35436755 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Knee and hip angle and moment adaptations during cutting tasks in subjects with anterior cruciate ligament deficiency classified as noncopers. Houck JR; Duncan A; De Haven KE J Orthop Sports Phys Ther; 2005 Aug; 35(8):531-40. PubMed ID: 16187513 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Pelvis and hip three-dimensional kinematics in grand battement movements. Bronner S; Ojofeitimi S J Dance Med Sci; 2011 Mar; 15(1):23-30. PubMed ID: 21703090 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]