120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27159533)
1. Morphologists overestimate the nuclear-to-cytoplasmic ratio.
Zhang ML; Guo AX; VandenBussche CJ
Cancer Cytopathol; 2016 Sep; 124(9):669-77. PubMed ID: 27159533
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Young investigator challenge: The accuracy of the nuclear-to-cytoplasmic ratio estimation among trained morphologists.
Vaickus LJ; Tambouret RH
Cancer Cytopathol; 2015 Sep; 123(9):524-30. PubMed ID: 26375883
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Digital image analysis supports a nuclear-to-cytoplasmic ratio cutoff value below 0.7 for positive for high-grade urothelial carcinoma and suspicious for high-grade urothelial carcinoma in urine cytology specimens.
McIntire PJ; Snow JT; Elsoukkary SS; Soong L; Sweeney J; Robinson BD; Siddiqui MT
Cancer Cytopathol; 2019 Feb; 127(2):120-124. PubMed ID: 30395388
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Digital image analysis supports a nuclear-to-cytoplasmic ratio cutoff value of 0.5 for atypical urothelial cells.
Hang JF; Charu V; Zhang ML; VandenBussche CJ
Cancer Cytopathol; 2017 Sep; 125(9):710-716. PubMed ID: 28581671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Applying the Paris system for reporting urine cytology to challenging cytology cases.
Glass R; Rosca O; Raab S; Szabelska J; Chau K; Sheikh-Fayyaz S; Cocker R
Diagn Cytopathol; 2019 Jul; 47(7):675-681. PubMed ID: 31017746
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Accuracy and Reproducibility of Nuclear/Cytoplasmic Ratio Assessments in Urinary Cytology Specimens.
Layfield LJ; Esebua M; Frazier SR; Hammer RD; Bivin WW; Nguyen V; Ersoy I; Schmidt RL
Diagn Cytopathol; 2017 Feb; 45(2):107-112. PubMed ID: 28110502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Perceptions of Paris: an international survey in preparation for The Paris System for Reporting Urinary Cytology 2.0 (TPS 2.0).
Kurtycz DFI; Wojcik EM; Rosenthal DL
J Am Soc Cytopathol; 2023; 12(1):66-74. PubMed ID: 36274039
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The Paris System for Reporting Urinary Cytology: The Quest to Develop a Standardized Terminology.
Barkan GA; Wojcik EM; Nayar R; Savic-Prince S; Quek ML; Kurtycz DF; Rosenthal DL
Acta Cytol; 2016; 60(3):185-97. PubMed ID: 27318895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The Paris System for Reporting Urinary Cytology: The Quest to Develop a Standardized Terminology.
Barkan GA; Wojcik EM; Nayar R; Savic-Prince S; Quek ML; Kurtycz DF; Rosenthal DL
Adv Anat Pathol; 2016 Jul; 23(4):193-201. PubMed ID: 27233050
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Diagnostic Agreement for High-Grade Urothelial Cell Carcinoma in Atypical Urine Cytology: A Nationwide Survey Reveals a Tendency for Overestimation in Specimens with an N/C Ratio Approaching 0.5.
Wang YH; Hang JF; Wen CH; Liao KC; Lee WY; Lai CR
Cancers (Basel); 2020 Jan; 12(2):. PubMed ID: 31979119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison between cytospin and liquid-based cytology in urine specimens classified according to the Paris System for Reporting Urinary Cytology.
Straccia P; Bizzarro T; Fadda G; Pierconti F
Cancer Cytopathol; 2016 Jul; 124(7):519-23. PubMed ID: 26989867
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Performance Characteristics of Urinary Tract Cytology: Observations From the College of American Pathologists Interlaboratory Comparison Program in Nongynecologic Cytopathology.
Barkan GA; Laucirica R; Auger M; Khalbuss W; Padmanabhan V; Souers R; Moriarty AT
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2015 Aug; 139(8):1009-13. PubMed ID: 26230653
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Results from the 2019 American Society of Cytopathology survey on rapid onsite evaluation (ROSE)-part 2: subjective views among the cytopathology community.
Sauter JL; Chen Y; Alex D; Balassanian R; Cuda J; Flanagan MB; Griffith CC; Illei P; Johnson DN; McGrath CM; Randolph ML; Reynolds JP; Spiczka AJ; van Zante A; VanderLaan PA;
J Am Soc Cytopathol; 2020; 9(6):570-578. PubMed ID: 32861593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Survey of medical training in cytopathology carried out by the journal Cytopathology.
Anshu ; Herbert A; Cochand-Priollet B; Cross P; Desai M; Dina R; Duskova J; Evered A; Farnsworth A; Gray W; Gupta SS; Kapila K; Kardum-Skelin I; Kloboves-Prevodnik V; Kobayashi TK; Koutselini H; Olszewski W; Onal B; Pitman MB; Marinsek Z; Sauer T; Schenck U; Schmitt F; Shabalova I; Smith JH; Tani E; Vass L; Vielh P; Wiener H
Cytopathology; 2010 Jun; 21(3):147-56. PubMed ID: 20482722
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Should the BK polyomavirus cytopathic effect be best classified as atypical or benign in urine cytology specimens?
Allison DB; Olson MT; Lilo M; Zhang ML; Rosenthal DL; VandenBussche CJ
Cancer Cytopathol; 2016 Jun; 124(6):436-42. PubMed ID: 26929126
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Cytology of spontaneous nipple discharge--is it worth it? Performance of nipple discharge preparations in the College of American Pathologists Interlaboratory Comparison Program in Nongynecologic Cytopathology.
Moriarty AT; Schwartz MR; Laucirica R; Booth CN; Auger M; Thomas NE; Souers RJ
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2013 Aug; 137(8):1039-42. PubMed ID: 23899058
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Learning from quantitation.
Alons CL; Veldhuizen RW; Boon ME
Anal Quant Cytol; 1981 Sep; 3(3):178-81. PubMed ID: 7294537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Paris Interobserver Reproducibility Study (PIRST).
Kurtycz DFI; Barkan GA; Pavelec DM; Rosenthal DL; Wojcik EM; VandenBussche CJ; Mangiulli K; Olson MT
J Am Soc Cytopathol; 2018; 7(4):174-184. PubMed ID: 31043274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Proposed Sheffield quantitative criteria in cervical cytology to assist the diagnosis and grading of squamous intra-epithelial lesions, as some Bethesda system definitions require amendment.
Slater DN; Rice S; Stewart R; Melling SE; Hewer EM; Smith JH
Cytopathology; 2005 Aug; 16(4):168-78. PubMed ID: 16048503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The cytomorphological features of low-grade urothelial neoplasms vary by specimen type.
Zhang ML; Rosenthal DL; VandenBussche CJ
Cancer Cytopathol; 2016 Aug; 124(8):552-64. PubMed ID: 27019161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
