These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

161 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27159634)

  • 1. Predicting Designability of Small Proteins from Graph Features of Contact Maps.
    Leelananda SP; Jernigan RL; Kloczkowski A
    J Comput Biol; 2016 May; 23(5):400-11. PubMed ID: 27159634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Exploration of the relationship between topology and designability of conformations.
    Leelananda SP; Towfic F; Jernigan RL; Kloczkowski A
    J Chem Phys; 2011 Jun; 134(23):235101. PubMed ID: 21702580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Use of machine learning algorithms to classify binary protein sequences as highly-designable or poorly-designable.
    Peto M; Kloczkowski A; Honavar V; Jernigan RL
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2008 Nov; 9():487. PubMed ID: 19014713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The designability of protein structures.
    Helling R; Li H; Mélin R; Miller J; Wingreen N; Zeng C; Tang C
    J Mol Graph Model; 2001; 19(1):157-67. PubMed ID: 11381527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Designable structures are easy to unfold.
    Dias CL; Grant M
    Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys; 2006 Oct; 74(4 Pt 1):042902. PubMed ID: 17155116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Emergence of highly designable protein-backbone conformations in an off-lattice model.
    Miller J; Zeng C; Wingreen NS; Tang C
    Proteins; 2002 Jun; 47(4):506-12. PubMed ID: 12001229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Correlations between designability and various structural characteristics of protein lattice models.
    Yang JY; Yu ZG; Anh V
    J Chem Phys; 2007 May; 126(19):195101. PubMed ID: 17523837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Identifying proteins of high designability via surface-exposure patterns.
    Emberly EG; Miller J; Zeng C; Wingreen NS; Tang C
    Proteins; 2002 May; 47(3):295-304. PubMed ID: 11948783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Emergence of preferred structures in a simple model of protein folding.
    Li H; Helling R; Tang C; Wingreen N
    Science; 1996 Aug; 273(5275):666-9. PubMed ID: 8662562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Geometric and statistical properties of the mean-field hydrophobic-polar model, the large-small model, and real protein sequences.
    Shih CT; Su ZY; Gwan JF; Hao BL; Hsieh CH; Lo JL; Lee HC
    Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys; 2002 Apr; 65(4 Pt 1):041923. PubMed ID: 12005889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A two-stage approach for improved prediction of residue contact maps.
    Vullo A; Walsh I; Pollastri G
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2006 Mar; 7():180. PubMed ID: 16573808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The distribution of structures in evolving protein populations.
    Taverna DM; Goldstein RA
    Biopolymers; 2000 Jan; 53(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 10644946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effect of alphabet size and foldability requirements on protein structure designability.
    Buchler NE; Goldstein RA
    Proteins; 1999 Jan; 34(1):113-24. PubMed ID: 10336377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Improving AlphaFold Predicted Contacts for Alpha-Helical Transmembrane Proteins Using Structural Features.
    Sawhney A; Li J; Liao L
    Int J Mol Sci; 2024 May; 25(10):. PubMed ID: 38791287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Designability of protein structures: a lattice-model study using the Miyazawa-Jernigan matrix.
    Li H; Tang C; Wingreen NS
    Proteins; 2002 Nov; 49(3):403-12. PubMed ID: 12360530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Rosetta FunFolDes - A general framework for the computational design of functional proteins.
    Bonet J; Wehrle S; Schriever K; Yang C; Billet A; Sesterhenn F; Scheck A; Sverrisson F; Veselkova B; Vollers S; Lourman R; Villard M; Rosset S; Krey T; Correia BE
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2018 Nov; 14(11):e1006623. PubMed ID: 30452434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A large-scale comparative assessment of methods for residue-residue contact prediction.
    Wuyun Q; Zheng W; Peng Z; Yang J
    Brief Bioinform; 2018 Mar; 19(2):219-230. PubMed ID: 27802931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Optimized null model for protein structure networks.
    Milenković T; Filippis I; Lappe M; Przulj N
    PLoS One; 2009 Jun; 4(6):e5967. PubMed ID: 19557139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluation of residue-residue contact prediction in CASP10.
    Monastyrskyy B; D'Andrea D; Fidelis K; Tramontano A; Kryshtafovych A
    Proteins; 2014 Feb; 82 Suppl 2(0 2):138-53. PubMed ID: 23760879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Predicting Drug-Target Interaction Using a Novel Graph Neural Network with 3D Structure-Embedded Graph Representation.
    Lim J; Ryu S; Park K; Choe YJ; Ham J; Kim WY
    J Chem Inf Model; 2019 Sep; 59(9):3981-3988. PubMed ID: 31443612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.