These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

172 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27160465)

  • 41. The effect of gamma tACS over the M1 region and cerebellar hemisphere does not depend on current intensity.
    Miyaguchi S; Otsuru N; Kojima S; Yokota H; Saito K; Inukai Y; Onishi H
    J Clin Neurosci; 2019 Jul; 65():54-58. PubMed ID: 30954355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. The Effect of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) Electrode Size and Current Intensity on Motor Cortical Excitability: Evidence From Single and Repeated Sessions.
    Ho KA; Taylor JL; Chew T; Gálvez V; Alonzo A; Bai S; Dokos S; Loo CK
    Brain Stimul; 2016; 9(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 26350410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Polarity-independent effects of tDCS on paired associative stimulation-induced plasticity.
    Faber H; Opitz A; Müller-Dahlhaus F; Ziemann U
    Brain Stimul; 2017; 10(6):1061-1069. PubMed ID: 28822654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Does Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation Induce Cerebellum Plasticity? Feasibility, Safety and Efficacy of a Novel Electrophysiological Approach.
    Naro A; Leo A; Russo M; Cannavò A; Milardi D; Bramanti P; Calabrò RS
    Brain Stimul; 2016; 9(3):388-395. PubMed ID: 26946958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Using high-amplitude and focused transcranial alternating current stimulation to entrain physiological tremor.
    Khatoun A; Breukers J; Op de Beeck S; Nica IG; Aerts JM; Seynaeve L; Haeck T; Asamoah B; Mc Laughlin M
    Sci Rep; 2018 Mar; 8(1):4927. PubMed ID: 29563594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. What Do We Know About the Influence of the Cerebellum on Walking Ability? Promising Findings from Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation.
    Naro A; Milardi D; Cacciola A; Russo M; Sciarrone F; La Rosa G; Bramanti A; Bramanti P; Calabrò RS
    Cerebellum; 2017 Aug; 16(4):859-867. PubMed ID: 28456901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Intensity dependent effects of transcranial direct current stimulation on corticospinal excitability in chronic spinal cord injury.
    Murray LM; Edwards DJ; Ruffini G; Labar D; Stampas A; Pascual-Leone A; Cortes M
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2015 Apr; 96(4 Suppl):S114-21. PubMed ID: 25461825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Modelling the effect of electrode displacement on transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS).
    Ramaraju S; Roula MA; McCarthy PW
    J Neural Eng; 2018 Feb; 15(1):016019. PubMed ID: 28925375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Comparatively weak after-effects of transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) on cortical excitability in humans.
    Antal A; Boros K; Poreisz C; Chaieb L; Terney D; Paulus W
    Brain Stimul; 2008 Apr; 1(2):97-105. PubMed ID: 20633376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Use of Computational Modeling to Inform tDCS Electrode Montages for the Promotion of Language Recovery in Post-stroke Aphasia.
    Galletta EE; Cancelli A; Cottone C; Simonelli I; Tecchio F; Bikson M; Marangolo P
    Brain Stimul; 2015; 8(6):1108-15. PubMed ID: 26198364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Probing EEG activity in the targeted cortex after focal transcranial electrical stimulation.
    Tashiro S; Siebner HR; Charalampaki A; Göksu C; Saturnino GB; Thielscher A; Tomasevic L
    Brain Stimul; 2020; 13(3):815-818. PubMed ID: 32289712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Transcranial direct current stimulation: electrode montage in stroke.
    Mahmoudi H; Borhani Haghighi A; Petramfar P; Jahanshahi S; Salehi Z; Fregni F
    Disabil Rehabil; 2011; 33(15-16):1383-8. PubMed ID: 21110732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. What is the optimal anodal electrode position for inducing corticomotor excitability changes in transcranial direct current stimulation?
    Lee M; Kim YH; Im CH; Kim JH; Park CH; Chang WH; Lee A
    Neurosci Lett; 2015 Jan; 584():347-50. PubMed ID: 25450146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Aftereffects of 2 noninvasive brain stimulation techniques on corticospinal excitability in persons with chronic stroke: a pilot study.
    Goh HT; Chan HY; Abdul-Latif L
    J Neurol Phys Ther; 2015 Jan; 39(1):15-22. PubMed ID: 25427033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Both the cutaneous sensation and phosphene perception are modulated in a frequency-specific manner during transcranial alternating current stimulation.
    Turi Z; Ambrus GG; Janacsek K; Emmert K; Hahn L; Paulus W; Antal A
    Restor Neurol Neurosci; 2013; 31(3):275-85. PubMed ID: 23478342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Comparison of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Electrode Montages for the Lower Limb Motor Cortex.
    Patel R; Madhavan S
    Brain Sci; 2019 Aug; 9(8):. PubMed ID: 31390741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Transcranial direct current stimulation improves isometric time to exhaustion of the knee extensors.
    Angius L; Pageaux B; Hopker J; Marcora SM; Mauger AR
    Neuroscience; 2016 Dec; 339():363-375. PubMed ID: 27751960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Comparison of the effects of transcranial random noise stimulation and transcranial direct current stimulation on motor cortical excitability.
    Ho KA; Taylor JL; Loo CK
    J ECT; 2015 Mar; 31(1):67-72. PubMed ID: 25010032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Anodal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Shows Minimal, Measure-Specific Effects on Dynamic Postural Control in Young and Older Adults: A Double Blind, Sham-Controlled Study.
    Craig CE; Doumas M
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(1):e0170331. PubMed ID: 28099522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Neurophysiological and behavioural effects of dual-hemisphere transcranial direct current stimulation on the proximal upper limb.
    McCambridge AB; Stinear JW; Byblow WD
    Exp Brain Res; 2016 Jun; 234(6):1419-28. PubMed ID: 26749182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.