BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

1403 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27161065)

  • 1. Dynamic contrast-enhanced and dynamic susceptibility contrast perfusion MR imaging for glioma grading: Preliminary comparison of vessel compartment and permeability parameters using hotspot and histogram analysis.
    Santarosa C; Castellano A; Conte GM; Cadioli M; Iadanza A; Terreni MR; Franzin A; Bello L; Caulo M; Falini A; Anzalone N
    Eur J Radiol; 2016 Jun; 85(6):1147-56. PubMed ID: 27161065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Prospective comparative diagnostic accuracy evaluation of dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) vs. dynamic susceptibility contrast (DSC) MR perfusion in differentiating tumor recurrence from radiation necrosis in treated high-grade gliomas.
    Zakhari N; Taccone MS; Torres CH; Chakraborty S; Sinclair J; Woulfe J; Jansen GH; Cron GO; Thornhill RE; McInnes MDF; Nguyen TB
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2019 Aug; 50(2):573-582. PubMed ID: 30614146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Histogram analysis of T2*-based pharmacokinetic imaging in cerebral glioma grading.
    Liu HS; Chiang SW; Chung HW; Tsai PH; Hsu FT; Cho NY; Wang CY; Chou MC; Chen CY
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2018 Mar; 155():19-27. PubMed ID: 29512499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Brain Gliomas: Multicenter Standardized Assessment of Dynamic Contrast-enhanced and Dynamic Susceptibility Contrast MR Images.
    Anzalone N; Castellano A; Cadioli M; Conte GM; Cuccarini V; Bizzi A; Grimaldi M; Costa A; Grillea G; Vitali P; Aquino D; Terreni MR; Torri V; Erickson BJ; Caulo M
    Radiology; 2018 Jun; 287(3):933-943. PubMed ID: 29361245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Differentiating between Central Nervous System Lymphoma and High-grade Glioma Using Dynamic Susceptibility Contrast and Dynamic Contrast-enhanced MR Imaging with Histogram Analysis.
    Murayama K; Nishiyama Y; Hirose Y; Abe M; Ohyu S; Ninomiya A; Fukuba T; Katada K; Toyama H
    Magn Reson Med Sci; 2018 Jan; 17(1):42-49. PubMed ID: 28515410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Diagnostic Values of DCE-MRI and DSC-MRI for Differentiation Between High-grade and Low-grade Gliomas: A Comprehensive Meta-analysis.
    Liang J; Liu D; Gao P; Zhang D; Chen H; Shi C; Luo L
    Acad Radiol; 2018 Mar; 25(3):338-348. PubMed ID: 29223713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Textural features of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI derived model-free and model-based parameter maps in glioma grading.
    Xie T; Chen X; Fang J; Kang H; Xue W; Tong H; Cao P; Wang S; Yang Y; Zhang W
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2018 Apr; 47(4):1099-1111. PubMed ID: 28845594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparing perfusion metrics obtained from a single compartment versus pharmacokinetic modeling methods using dynamic susceptibility contrast-enhanced perfusion MR imaging with glioma grade.
    Law M; Young R; Babb J; Rad M; Sasaki T; Zagzag D; Johnson G
    AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 2006 Oct; 27(9):1975-82. PubMed ID: 17032878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Prognostic value of preoperative dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI perfusion parameters for high-grade glioma patients.
    Ulyte A; Katsaros VK; Liouta E; Stranjalis G; Boskos C; Papanikolaou N; Usinskiene J; Bisdas S
    Neuroradiology; 2016 Dec; 58(12):1197-1208. PubMed ID: 27796446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Correlation of Tumor Immunohistochemistry with Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced and DSC-MRI Parameters in Patients with Gliomas.
    Nguyen TB; Cron GO; Bezzina K; Perdrizet K; Torres CH; Chakraborty S; Woulfe J; Jansen GH; Thornhill RE; Zanette B; Cameron IG
    AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 2016 Dec; 37(12):2217-2223. PubMed ID: 27585700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Perfusion MRI grading diffuse gliomas: Impact of permeability parameters on molecular biomarkers and survival.
    Hilario A; Hernandez-Lain A; Sepulveda JM; Lagares A; Perez-Nuñez A; Ramos A
    Neurocirugia (Astur : Engl Ed); 2019; 30(1):11-18. PubMed ID: 30143443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Intergrating conventional MRI, texture analysis of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI, and susceptibility weighted imaging for glioma grading.
    Su CQ; Lu SS; Han QY; Zhou MD; Hong XN
    Acta Radiol; 2019 Jun; 60(6):777-787. PubMed ID: 30244590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Differentiation between glioblastoma and primary CNS lymphoma: application of DCE-MRI parameters based on arterial input function obtained from DSC-MRI.
    Kang KM; Choi SH; Chul-Kee P; Kim TM; Park SH; Lee JH; Lee ST; Hwang I; Yoo RE; Yun TJ; Kim JH; Sohn CH
    Eur Radiol; 2021 Dec; 31(12):9098-9109. PubMed ID: 34003350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Reproducibility of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI and dynamic susceptibility contrast MRI in the study of brain gliomas: a comparison of data obtained using different commercial software.
    Conte GM; Castellano A; Altabella L; Iadanza A; Cadioli M; Falini A; Anzalone N
    Radiol Med; 2017 Apr; 122(4):294-302. PubMed ID: 28070841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Diagnostic Value of Combining Permeability with T1 Perfusion Parameters in Quantitative Dynamic Contrast-enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Glioma Grading].
    Sun SJ; Qian HF; Li FQ; Li ZY; Wu X
    Zhongguo Yi Xue Ke Xue Yuan Xue Bao; 2015 Dec; 37(6):674-80. PubMed ID: 26725390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Discrimination between glioma grades II and III in suspected low-grade gliomas using dynamic contrast-enhanced and dynamic susceptibility contrast perfusion MR imaging: a histogram analysis approach.
    Falk A; Fahlström M; Rostrup E; Berntsson S; Zetterling M; Morell A; Larsson HB; Smits A; Larsson EM
    Neuroradiology; 2014 Dec; 56(12):1031-8. PubMed ID: 25204450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Application of histogram analysis for the evaluation of vascular permeability in glioma by the K2 parameter obtained with the dynamic susceptibility contrast method: Comparisons with Ktrans obtained with the dynamic contrast enhance method and cerebral blood volume.
    Taoka T; Kawai H; Nakane T; Hori S; Ochi T; Miyasaka T; Sakamoto M; Kichikawa K; Naganawa S
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2016 Sep; 34(7):896-901. PubMed ID: 27109485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of cerebral blood volume and vascular permeability from dynamic susceptibility contrast-enhanced perfusion MR imaging with glioma grade.
    Law M; Yang S; Babb JS; Knopp EA; Golfinos JG; Zagzag D; Johnson G
    AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 2004 May; 25(5):746-55. PubMed ID: 15140713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Glioma grading capability: comparisons among parameters from dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI and ADC value on DWI.
    Choi HS; Kim AH; Ahn SS; Shin NY; Kim J; Lee SK
    Korean J Radiol; 2013; 14(3):487-92. PubMed ID: 23690718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of the Diagnostic Accuracy of DSC- and Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI in the Preoperative Grading of Astrocytomas.
    Nguyen TB; Cron GO; Perdrizet K; Bezzina K; Torres CH; Chakraborty S; Woulfe J; Jansen GH; Sinclair J; Thornhill RE; Foottit C; Zanette B; Cameron IG
    AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 2015 Nov; 36(11):2017-22. PubMed ID: 26228886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 71.