These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

1154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27161065)

  • 1. Dynamic contrast-enhanced and dynamic susceptibility contrast perfusion MR imaging for glioma grading: Preliminary comparison of vessel compartment and permeability parameters using hotspot and histogram analysis.
    Santarosa C; Castellano A; Conte GM; Cadioli M; Iadanza A; Terreni MR; Franzin A; Bello L; Caulo M; Falini A; Anzalone N
    Eur J Radiol; 2016 Jun; 85(6):1147-56. PubMed ID: 27161065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Prospective comparative diagnostic accuracy evaluation of dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) vs. dynamic susceptibility contrast (DSC) MR perfusion in differentiating tumor recurrence from radiation necrosis in treated high-grade gliomas.
    Zakhari N; Taccone MS; Torres CH; Chakraborty S; Sinclair J; Woulfe J; Jansen GH; Cron GO; Thornhill RE; McInnes MDF; Nguyen TB
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2019 Aug; 50(2):573-582. PubMed ID: 30614146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Histogram analysis of T2*-based pharmacokinetic imaging in cerebral glioma grading.
    Liu HS; Chiang SW; Chung HW; Tsai PH; Hsu FT; Cho NY; Wang CY; Chou MC; Chen CY
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2018 Mar; 155():19-27. PubMed ID: 29512499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Brain Gliomas: Multicenter Standardized Assessment of Dynamic Contrast-enhanced and Dynamic Susceptibility Contrast MR Images.
    Anzalone N; Castellano A; Cadioli M; Conte GM; Cuccarini V; Bizzi A; Grimaldi M; Costa A; Grillea G; Vitali P; Aquino D; Terreni MR; Torri V; Erickson BJ; Caulo M
    Radiology; 2018 Jun; 287(3):933-943. PubMed ID: 29361245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Differentiating between Central Nervous System Lymphoma and High-grade Glioma Using Dynamic Susceptibility Contrast and Dynamic Contrast-enhanced MR Imaging with Histogram Analysis.
    Murayama K; Nishiyama Y; Hirose Y; Abe M; Ohyu S; Ninomiya A; Fukuba T; Katada K; Toyama H
    Magn Reson Med Sci; 2018 Jan; 17(1):42-49. PubMed ID: 28515410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Diagnostic Values of DCE-MRI and DSC-MRI for Differentiation Between High-grade and Low-grade Gliomas: A Comprehensive Meta-analysis.
    Liang J; Liu D; Gao P; Zhang D; Chen H; Shi C; Luo L
    Acad Radiol; 2018 Mar; 25(3):338-348. PubMed ID: 29223713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Textural features of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI derived model-free and model-based parameter maps in glioma grading.
    Xie T; Chen X; Fang J; Kang H; Xue W; Tong H; Cao P; Wang S; Yang Y; Zhang W
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2018 Apr; 47(4):1099-1111. PubMed ID: 28845594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparing perfusion metrics obtained from a single compartment versus pharmacokinetic modeling methods using dynamic susceptibility contrast-enhanced perfusion MR imaging with glioma grade.
    Law M; Young R; Babb J; Rad M; Sasaki T; Zagzag D; Johnson G
    AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 2006 Oct; 27(9):1975-82. PubMed ID: 17032878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Prognostic value of preoperative dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI perfusion parameters for high-grade glioma patients.
    Ulyte A; Katsaros VK; Liouta E; Stranjalis G; Boskos C; Papanikolaou N; Usinskiene J; Bisdas S
    Neuroradiology; 2016 Dec; 58(12):1197-1208. PubMed ID: 27796446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Correlation of Tumor Immunohistochemistry with Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced and DSC-MRI Parameters in Patients with Gliomas.
    Nguyen TB; Cron GO; Bezzina K; Perdrizet K; Torres CH; Chakraborty S; Woulfe J; Jansen GH; Thornhill RE; Zanette B; Cameron IG
    AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 2016 Dec; 37(12):2217-2223. PubMed ID: 27585700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Perfusion MRI grading diffuse gliomas: Impact of permeability parameters on molecular biomarkers and survival.
    Hilario A; Hernandez-Lain A; Sepulveda JM; Lagares A; Perez-Nuñez A; Ramos A
    Neurocirugia (Astur : Engl Ed); 2019; 30(1):11-18. PubMed ID: 30143443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Intergrating conventional MRI, texture analysis of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI, and susceptibility weighted imaging for glioma grading.
    Su CQ; Lu SS; Han QY; Zhou MD; Hong XN
    Acta Radiol; 2019 Jun; 60(6):777-787. PubMed ID: 30244590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Differentiation between glioblastoma and primary CNS lymphoma: application of DCE-MRI parameters based on arterial input function obtained from DSC-MRI.
    Kang KM; Choi SH; Chul-Kee P; Kim TM; Park SH; Lee JH; Lee ST; Hwang I; Yoo RE; Yun TJ; Kim JH; Sohn CH
    Eur Radiol; 2021 Dec; 31(12):9098-9109. PubMed ID: 34003350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Reproducibility of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI and dynamic susceptibility contrast MRI in the study of brain gliomas: a comparison of data obtained using different commercial software.
    Conte GM; Castellano A; Altabella L; Iadanza A; Cadioli M; Falini A; Anzalone N
    Radiol Med; 2017 Apr; 122(4):294-302. PubMed ID: 28070841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Diagnostic Value of Combining Permeability with T1 Perfusion Parameters in Quantitative Dynamic Contrast-enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Glioma Grading].
    Sun SJ; Qian HF; Li FQ; Li ZY; Wu X
    Zhongguo Yi Xue Ke Xue Yuan Xue Bao; 2015 Dec; 37(6):674-80. PubMed ID: 26725390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Discrimination between glioma grades II and III in suspected low-grade gliomas using dynamic contrast-enhanced and dynamic susceptibility contrast perfusion MR imaging: a histogram analysis approach.
    Falk A; Fahlström M; Rostrup E; Berntsson S; Zetterling M; Morell A; Larsson HB; Smits A; Larsson EM
    Neuroradiology; 2014 Dec; 56(12):1031-8. PubMed ID: 25204450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Application of histogram analysis for the evaluation of vascular permeability in glioma by the K2 parameter obtained with the dynamic susceptibility contrast method: Comparisons with Ktrans obtained with the dynamic contrast enhance method and cerebral blood volume.
    Taoka T; Kawai H; Nakane T; Hori S; Ochi T; Miyasaka T; Sakamoto M; Kichikawa K; Naganawa S
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2016 Sep; 34(7):896-901. PubMed ID: 27109485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of cerebral blood volume and vascular permeability from dynamic susceptibility contrast-enhanced perfusion MR imaging with glioma grade.
    Law M; Yang S; Babb JS; Knopp EA; Golfinos JG; Zagzag D; Johnson G
    AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 2004 May; 25(5):746-55. PubMed ID: 15140713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Glioma grading capability: comparisons among parameters from dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI and ADC value on DWI.
    Choi HS; Kim AH; Ahn SS; Shin NY; Kim J; Lee SK
    Korean J Radiol; 2013; 14(3):487-92. PubMed ID: 23690718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of the Diagnostic Accuracy of DSC- and Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI in the Preoperative Grading of Astrocytomas.
    Nguyen TB; Cron GO; Perdrizet K; Bezzina K; Torres CH; Chakraborty S; Woulfe J; Jansen GH; Sinclair J; Thornhill RE; Foottit C; Zanette B; Cameron IG
    AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 2015 Nov; 36(11):2017-22. PubMed ID: 26228886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 58.