151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27162020)
1. The use of the Podotrack in forensic podiatry for collection and analysis of bare footprints using the Reel method of measurement.
Burrow JG
Sci Justice; 2016 May; 56(3):216-222. PubMed ID: 27162020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Two-dimensional linear analysis of dynamic bare footprints: A comparison of measurement techniques.
Nirenberg MS; Ansert E; Krishan K; Kanchan T
Sci Justice; 2019 Sep; 59(5):552-557. PubMed ID: 31472800
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Reliability of a two-dimensional sock-clad footprint linear measurement method.
Nirenberg MS; Ansert E; Reel S
Sci Justice; 2021 Sep; 61(5):649-656. PubMed ID: 34482945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Forensic measurement comparison of foot insole impressions.
Nirenberg MS; Ansert E; Minetola TJ; Esbenson AM; Samuel AL; Campbell J
Sci Justice; 2024 May; 64(3):264-268. PubMed ID: 38735661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Two-dimensional metric comparisons between dynamic bare footprints and insole foot impressions-forensic implications.
Nirenberg MS; Ansert E; Krishan K; Kanchan T
Sci Justice; 2020 Mar; 60(2):145-150. PubMed ID: 32111287
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Two-dimensional metric comparison between dynamic bare and sock-clad footprints for its forensic implications - A pilot study.
Nirenberg MS; Ansert E; Krishan K; Kanchan T
Sci Justice; 2019 Jan; 59(1):46-51. PubMed ID: 30654967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Emergence of forensic podiatry--A novel sub-discipline of forensic sciences.
Krishan K; Kanchan T; DiMaggio JA
Forensic Sci Int; 2015 Oct; 255():16-27. PubMed ID: 26163192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparative analysis of static and dynamic bare footprint dimensions in a north Indian population.
Mukhra R; Krishan K; Nirenberg MS; Ansert E; Kanchan T
Forensic Sci Int; 2020 Mar; 308():110169. PubMed ID: 32004995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Bare footprint metric analysis methods for comparison and identification in forensic examinations: A review of literature.
Mukhra R; Krishan K; Kanchan T
J Forensic Leg Med; 2018 Aug; 58():101-112. PubMed ID: 29777981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A comparison of the length and width of static inked two-dimensional bare footprints found on a hard compared to a soft surface.
Curran M; Holmes I
Sci Justice; 2019 Jul; 59(4):448-451. PubMed ID: 31256817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The contact area of static and dynamic footprints: Forensic implications.
Mukhra R; Krishan K; Nirenberg MS; Ansert E; Kanchan T
Sci Justice; 2021 Mar; 61(2):187-192. PubMed ID: 33736852
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. An investigation into the cause of the inner dark areas and outer lighter areas (ghosting) seen in dynamically-created two-dimensional bare footprints.
Obe WV; Simmonite N; Reel S; Reidy S
Sci Justice; 2017 Jul; 57(4):276-282. PubMed ID: 28606334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A comparative study of standing fleshed foot and walking and jumping bare footprint measurements.
Howsam N; Bridgen A
Sci Justice; 2018 Sep; 58(5):346-354. PubMed ID: 30193660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Ghosting phenomenon in static and dynamic footprints in India and the United States.
Ansert E; Nirenberg MS; Mukhra R; Kanchan T; Krishan K
Sci Justice; 2023 May; 63(3):406-413. PubMed ID: 37169466
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The identification and reliability of static and dynamic barefoot impression measurements: A systematic review.
Hu A; Arnold JB; Causby R; Jones S
Forensic Sci Int; 2018 Aug; 289():156-164. PubMed ID: 29864603
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Application of non-contact scanning to forensic podiatry: A feasibility study.
Crowther M; Reidy S; Walker J; Islam M; Thompson T
Sci Justice; 2021 Jan; 61(1):79-88. PubMed ID: 33357830
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Interpreting locomotor biomechanics from the morphology of human footprints.
Hatala KG; Wunderlich RE; Dingwall HL; Richmond BG
J Hum Evol; 2016 Jan; 90():38-48. PubMed ID: 26767958
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Analysis of footprint and its parts for stature estimation in Indian population.
Kanchan T; Krishan K; ShyamSundar S; Aparna KR; Jaiswal S
Foot (Edinb); 2012 Sep; 22(3):175-80. PubMed ID: 22456109
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A preliminary study investigating the overlay method in forensic podiatry for comparison of insole footprints.
Howsam N; Reel S; Killey J
Sci Justice; 2022 Sep; 62(5):494-505. PubMed ID: 36336442
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The importance of assessing the ghosting phenomenon in dynamic footprints when estimating stature - Forensic implications.
Švábová P; Hanzelyová K; Chovancová M; Masnicová S; Beňuš R
Sci Justice; 2024 May; 64(3):322-332. PubMed ID: 38735669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
