BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

441 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27162117)

  • 1. Adjunctive targeted contrast-enhanced ultrasonography for the work-up of Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System category 3 and 4 lesions.
    Zhang XL; Guan J; Li MZ; Liu MJ; Guo Y; Zheng YL; Yang Z; Yang JY
    J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol; 2016 Aug; 60(4):485-91. PubMed ID: 27162117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Incorporating Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound into the BI-RADS Scoring System Improves Accuracy in Breast Tumor Diagnosis: A Preliminary Study in China.
    Xiao X; Dong L; Jiang Q; Guan X; Wu H; Luo B
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2016 Nov; 42(11):2630-2638. PubMed ID: 27544439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A Prospective Multicenter Study on the Additive Value of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound for Biopsy Decision of Ultrasound BI-RADS 4 Breast Lesions.
    Luo J; Tang L; Chen Y; Yang L; Shen R; Cheng Y; Zhang Z; Lv Z; Yuan L; Yang Y; Cheng Y; Bai B; Luo J; Chen Q
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2024 Aug; 50(8):1224-1231. PubMed ID: 38796340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Application of contrast-enhanced ultrasound in the diagnosis of small breast lesions.
    Du YR; Wu Y; Chen M; Gu XG
    Clin Hemorheol Microcirc; 2018; 70(3):291-300. PubMed ID: 29710688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Diagnosis of sub-centimetre breast lesions: combining BI-RADS-US with strain elastography and contrast-enhanced ultrasound-a preliminary study in China.
    Xiao X; Jiang Q; Wu H; Guan X; Qin W; Luo B
    Eur Radiol; 2017 Jun; 27(6):2443-2450. PubMed ID: 27761708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The role of contrast-enhanced ultrasound in the diagnosis of malignant non-mass breast lesions and exploration of diagnostic criteria.
    Zhang F; Jin L; Li G; Jia C; Shi Q; Du L; Wu R
    Br J Radiol; 2021 Apr; 94(1120):20200880. PubMed ID: 33560894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound in the diagnosis of breast US-BI-RADS 3 and 4 lesions with calcifications.
    Cheng M; Tong W; Luo J; Li M; Liang J; Pan F; Pan J; Zheng Y; Xie X
    Clin Radiol; 2020 Dec; 75(12):934-941. PubMed ID: 32814625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging in screening detected microcalcification lesions of the breast: is there any value?
    Uematsu T; Yuen S; Kasami M; Uchida Y
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2007 Jul; 103(3):269-81. PubMed ID: 17063274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Breast non-mass-like lesions on contrast-enhanced ultrasonography: Feature analysis, breast image reporting and data system classification assessment.
    Xu P; Yang M; Liu Y; Li YP; Zhang H; Shao GR
    World J Clin Cases; 2020 Feb; 8(4):700-712. PubMed ID: 32149054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Does contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) play a better role in diagnosis of breast lesions with calcification? A comparison with MRI.
    Pan J; Tong W; Luo J; Liang J; Pan F; Zheng Y; Xie X
    Br J Radiol; 2020 Aug; 93(1112):20200195. PubMed ID: 32463295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Usefulness of combined BI-RADS analysis and Nakagami statistics of ultrasound echoes in the diagnosis of breast lesions.
    Dobruch-Sobczak K; Piotrzkowska-Wróblewska H; Roszkowska-Purska K; Nowicki A; Jakubowski W
    Clin Radiol; 2017 Apr; 72(4):339.e7-339.e15. PubMed ID: 28038779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Assessment of BI-RADS category 4 lesions detected with screening mammography and screening US: utility of MR imaging.
    Strobel K; Schrading S; Hansen NL; Barabasch A; Kuhl CK
    Radiology; 2015 Feb; 274(2):343-51. PubMed ID: 25271857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Incorporation of contrast-enhanced ultrasound in the differential diagnosis for breast lesions with inconsistent results on mammography and conventional ultrasound.
    Shao SH; Li CX; Yao MH; Li G; Li X; Wu R
    Clin Hemorheol Microcirc; 2020; 74(4):463-473. PubMed ID: 31868661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Value of contrast-enhanced malignancy imaging features in secondary grade diagnosis of BI-RADS-US type 4 breast lesions.
    Gao J; Han W; Ai Si Mu Tu La DLMT; Hou X; Li ZM; Song T
    Tumori; 2021 Oct; 107(5):424-431. PubMed ID: 33124515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Differential Diagnosis of Breast Category 3 and 4 Nodules Through BI-RADS Classification in Conjunction with Shear Wave Elastography.
    Wang M; Yang Z; Liu C; Yan J; Zhang W; Sun J; Cui G
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2017 Mar; 43(3):601-606. PubMed ID: 27988221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Prospective evaluation of contrast-enhanced ultrasound of breast BI-RADS 3-5 lesions.
    Janu E; Krikavova L; Little J; Dvorak K; Brancikova D; Jandakova E; Pavlik T; Kovalcikova P; Kazda T; Valek V
    BMC Med Imaging; 2020 Jun; 20(1):66. PubMed ID: 32552678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Can strain elastography combined with ultrasound breast imaging reporting and data system be a more effective method in the differentiation of benign and malignant breast lesions?
    Arslan S; Uslu N; Ozturk FU; Akcay EY; Tezcaner T; Agildere AM
    J Med Ultrason (2001); 2017 Oct; 44(4):289-296. PubMed ID: 28154989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Differentiating benign from malignant solid breast lesions: combined utility of conventional ultrasound and contrast-enhanced ultrasound in comparison with magnetic resonance imaging.
    Du J; Wang L; Wan CF; Hua J; Fang H; Chen J; Li FH
    Eur J Radiol; 2012 Dec; 81(12):3890-9. PubMed ID: 23062280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The clinical value of conventional ultrasound combined with contrast-enhanced ultrasound in the evaluation of BI-RADS 4 lesions detected by magnetic resonance imaging.
    Guo W; Li F; Jia C; Wang T; Zhang X; Yao G; Shi X; Bai M
    Br J Radiol; 2022 Aug; 95(1136):20220025. PubMed ID: 35604699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A Pivotal Study of Optoacoustic Imaging to Diagnose Benign and Malignant Breast Masses: A New Evaluation Tool for Radiologists.
    Neuschler EI; Butler R; Young CA; Barke LD; Bertrand ML; Böhm-Vélez M; Destounis S; Donlan P; Grobmyer SR; Katzen J; Kist KA; Lavin PT; Makariou EV; Parris TM; Schilling KJ; Tucker FL; Dogan BE
    Radiology; 2018 May; 287(2):398-412. PubMed ID: 29178816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 23.