332 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27163956)
1. Insurance Status, Not Race, is Associated With Use of Minimally Invasive Surgical Approach for Rectal Cancer.
Turner M; Adam MA; Sun Z; Kim J; Ezekian B; Yerokun B; Mantyh C; Migaly J
Ann Surg; 2017 Apr; 265(4):774-781. PubMed ID: 27163956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Minimally invasive versus open total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: Long-term results from a case-matched study of 633 patients.
Cho MS; Kim CW; Baek SJ; Hur H; Min BS; Baik SH; Lee KY; Kim NK
Surgery; 2015 Jun; 157(6):1121-9. PubMed ID: 25737005
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. National disparities in minimally invasive surgery for rectal cancer.
Gabriel E; Thirunavukarasu P; Al-Sukhni E; Attwood K; Nurkin SJ
Surg Endosc; 2016 Mar; 30(3):1060-7. PubMed ID: 26092020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Massachusetts health care reform and reduced racial disparities in minimally invasive surgery.
Loehrer AP; Song Z; Auchincloss HG; Hutter MM
JAMA Surg; 2013 Dec; 148(12):1116-22. PubMed ID: 24089326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Disparities in the use of minimally invasive surgery for colorectal disease.
Robinson CN; Balentine CJ; Sansgiry S; Berger DH
J Gastrointest Surg; 2012 May; 16(5):897-903; discussion 903-4. PubMed ID: 22411487
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Superior pathologic and clinical outcomes after minimally invasive rectal cancer resection, compared to open resection.
Lee GC; Bordeianou LG; Francone TD; Blaszkowsky LS; Goldstone RN; Ricciardi R; Kunitake H; Qadan M
Surg Endosc; 2020 Aug; 34(8):3435-3448. PubMed ID: 31844971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. National trends and disparities of minimally invasive surgery for localized renal cancer, 2010 to 2015.
Xia L; Talwar R; Taylor BL; Shin MH; Berger IB; Sperling CD; Chelluri RR; Zambrano IA; Raman JD; Guzzo TJ
Urol Oncol; 2019 Mar; 37(3):182.e17-182.e27. PubMed ID: 30630732
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Examination of Racial Disparities in the Receipt of Minimally Invasive Surgery Among a National Cohort of Adult Patients Undergoing Colorectal Surgery.
Damle RN; Flahive JM; Davids JS; Maykel JA; Sturrock PR; Alavi K
Dis Colon Rectum; 2016 Nov; 59(11):1055-1062. PubMed ID: 27749481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Barriers to laparoscopic colon resection for cancer: a national analysis.
Hawkins AT; Ford MM; Benjamin Hopkins M; Muldoon RL; Wanderer JP; Parikh AA; Geiger TM
Surg Endosc; 2018 Feb; 32(2):1035-1042. PubMed ID: 28840352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Factors Associated With Minimally Invasive Surgery for Colorectal Cancer in Emergency Settings.
Osagiede O; Spaulding AC; Cochuyt JJ; Naessens JM; Merchea A; Crandall M; Colibaseanu DT
J Surg Res; 2019 Nov; 243():75-82. PubMed ID: 31158727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. National disparities in use of minimally invasive surgery for rectal cancer in older adults.
Simon HL; Reif de Paula T; Spigel ZA; Keller DS
J Am Geriatr Soc; 2022 Jan; 70(1):126-135. PubMed ID: 34559891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Minimally Invasive Surgery for Rectal Adenocarcinoma Shows Promising Outcomes Compared to Laparotomy, a National Cancer Database Observational Analysis.
Skancke M; Schoolfield C; Umapathi B; Amdur R; Brody F; Obias V
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2019 Feb; 29(2):218-224. PubMed ID: 30431390
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Minimally Invasive Versus Open Low Anterior Resection: Equivalent Survival in a National Analysis of 14,033 Patients With Rectal Cancer.
Sun Z; Kim J; Adam MA; Nussbaum DP; Speicher PJ; Mantyh CR; Migaly J
Ann Surg; 2016 Jun; 263(6):1152-8. PubMed ID: 26501702
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Open versus minimally invasive surgery for rectal cancer: a single-center cohort study on 237 consecutive patients.
Quero G; Rosa F; Ricci R; Fiorillo C; Giustiniani MC; Cina C; Menghi R; Doglietto GB; Alfieri S
Updates Surg; 2019 Sep; 71(3):493-504. PubMed ID: 30868546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The Impact of Conversion to Laparotomy in Rectal Cancer : A National Cancer Database Analysis of 57 574 Patients.
Parascandola SA; Hota S; Tampo MMT; Sparks AD; Obias V
Am Surg; 2020 Jul; 86(7):811-818. PubMed ID: 32683917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Disparities in minimally invasive surgery for colorectal cancer in Florida.
Osagiede O; Spaulding AC; Cochuyt JJ; Naessens JM; Merchea A; Kasi PM; Crandall M; Colibaseanu DT
Am J Surg; 2019 Aug; 218(2):293-301. PubMed ID: 30503514
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A new perspective on the value of minimally invasive colorectal surgery-payer, provider, and patient benefits.
Keller DS; Senagore AJ; Fitch K; Bochner A; Haas EM
Surg Endosc; 2017 Jul; 31(7):2846-2853. PubMed ID: 27815745
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The Presence of an Advanced Gastrointestinal (GI)/Minimally Invasive Surgery (MIS) Fellowship Program Does Not Impact Short-Term Patient Outcomes Following Fundoplication or Esophagomyotomy.
Groves DK; Altieri MS; Sullivan B; Yang J; Talamini MA; Pryor AD
J Gastrointest Surg; 2018 Nov; 22(11):1870-1880. PubMed ID: 29980972
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Association of insurance status and ethnicity with cancer stage at diagnosis for 12 cancer sites: a retrospective analysis.
Halpern MT; Ward EM; Pavluck AL; Schrag NM; Bian J; Chen AY
Lancet Oncol; 2008 Mar; 9(3):222-31. PubMed ID: 18282806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Minimally invasive surgery for stage III colon adenocarcinoma is associated with less delay to initiation of adjuvant systemic therapy and improved survival.
Lee L; Wong-Chong N; Kelly JJ; Nassif GJ; Albert MR; Monson JRT
Surg Endosc; 2019 Feb; 33(2):460-470. PubMed ID: 29967992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
