These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

94 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27163983)

  • 1. A Pragmatic Approach to Determine Components of Optimal Screening Mammography Practice.
    Burnside ES; Sickles EA; Duffy SW
    JAMA; 2016 May; 315(18):1951-3. PubMed ID: 27163983
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Guidelines for high quality mammography screening.
    Matveeva N; Korneti K; Antevska S; Strateska A
    Prilozi; 2008 Dec; 29(2):345-54. PubMed ID: 19259058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A Simulation Screening Mammography Module Created for Instruction and Assessment: Radiology Residents vs National Benchmarks.
    Poot JD; Chetlen AL
    Acad Radiol; 2016 Nov; 23(11):1454-1462. PubMed ID: 27637285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Digital Breast Imaging Workflow.
    Odle TG
    Radiol Technol; 2016; 87(3):305M-322M; quiz 323M-326M. PubMed ID: 26721854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Lessons from the mammography wars.
    Quanstrum KH; Hayward RA
    N Engl J Med; 2010 Sep; 363(11):1076-9. PubMed ID: 20825322
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Mammography: yet another challenge.
    Kopans DB
    Radiology; 2009 Dec; 253(3):587-9. PubMed ID: 19952020
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Mammography 1984: challenge to radiology.
    McLelland R
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1984 Jul; 143(1):1-4. PubMed ID: 6428201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Mammography: will adequate manpower exist?
    D'Orsi CJ
    Radiol Clin North Am; 2004 Sep; 42(5):975-8, viii. PubMed ID: 15337429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Influences of Radiology Trainees on Screening Mammography Interpretation.
    Hawley JR; Taylor CR; Cubbison AM; Erdal BS; Yildiz VO; Carkaci S
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2016 May; 13(5):554-61. PubMed ID: 26924162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Risk of risk-based mammography screening, ages 40 to 49. American College of Radiology Task Force on Breast Cancer.
    Bassett LW; Cardenosa G; D'Orsi CJ; Dempsey PJ; Dershaw DD; Destouet JM; Evans WP; Feig SA; Hendrick RE; Jackson VP; Kopans DB; Linver MN; Mendelson EB; Monsees B; Racenstein MJ; Sickles EA; Stelling CB; Warren L
    J Clin Oncol; 1999 Feb; 17(2):735-8. PubMed ID: 10080624
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Malpractice issues in radiology. Mammography and the patient information form.
    Homer MJ; Berlin L
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2002 Feb; 178(2):307-10. PubMed ID: 11804884
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Mammography and malpractice.
    Potchen EJ; Bisesi MA; Sierra AE; Potchen JE
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1991 Mar; 156(3):475-80. PubMed ID: 1741799
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Mammography: a radiologist's view.
    Strax P
    CA Cancer J Clin; 1979; 29(1):48-52. PubMed ID: 110399
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Computer-aided screening mammography.
    Gur D
    N Engl J Med; 2007 Jul; 357(1):83-4; author reply 85. PubMed ID: 17615631
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Declining screening mammography rates: a multigenerational loss of opportunity?
    Carlos RC
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2009 Feb; 192(2):388-9. PubMed ID: 19155399
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. ACR system enhances mammography reporting.
    Kopans D; D'Orsi C
    Diagn Imaging (San Franc); 1992 Sep; 14(9):125-32. PubMed ID: 10183943
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Clinical performance metrics of 3D digital breast tomosynthesis compared with 2D digital mammography for breast cancer screening in community practice.
    Greenberg JS; Javitt MC; Katzen J; Michael S; Holland AE
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2014 Sep; 203(3):687-93. PubMed ID: 24918774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. An improved method in diagnostic roentgenography of the breast.
    LINDELL MM; BOYLE JJ
    Am J Roentgenol Radium Ther Nucl Med; 1961 Jul; 86():178-83. PubMed ID: 13762301
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Harmonizing Breast Cancer Screening Recommendations: Metrics and Accountability.
    Lee CS; Moy L; Friedewald SM; Sickles EA; Monticciolo DL
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2018 Feb; 210(2):241-245. PubMed ID: 29045178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Conversion to digital mammography in a private practice.
    Destounis S; Morgan R; Arieno A; Demay S; Kissel D
    Semin Roentgenol; 2011 Jan; 46(1):18-25. PubMed ID: 21134525
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.