These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27164895)

  • 1. Estimates of Lifetime Extradyadic Sex Using a Hybrid of Randomized Response Technique and Crosswise Design.
    Tu SH; Hsieh SH
    Arch Sex Behav; 2017 Feb; 46(2):373-384. PubMed ID: 27164895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Sensitivity of Crosswise Model to Simplistic Selection of Nonsensitive Questions: An Application to Estimate Substance Use, Alcohol Consumption and Extramarital Sex Among Iranian College Students.
    Safiri S; Rahimi-Movaghar A; Mansournia MA; Yunesian M; Shamsipour M; Sadeghi-Bazargani H; Fotouhi A
    Subst Use Misuse; 2019; 54(4):601-611. PubMed ID: 30595063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. An alternative to unrelated randomized response techniques with logistic regression analysis.
    Hsieh SH; Lee SM; Li CS; Tu SH
    Stat Methods Appt; 2016 Nov; 25(4):601-621. PubMed ID: 31105507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The role of attachment avoidance in extradyadic sex.
    Beaulieu-Pelletier G; Philippe FL; Lecours S; Couture S
    Attach Hum Dev; 2011 May; 13(3):293-313. PubMed ID: 21506032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Infidelity in Dating Relationships: Gender-Specific Correlates of Face-to-Face and Online Extradyadic Involvement.
    Martins A; Pereira M; Andrade R; Dattilio FM; Narciso I; Canavarro MC
    Arch Sex Behav; 2016 Jan; 45(1):193-205. PubMed ID: 26194971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. More is not always better: An experimental individual-level validation of the randomized response technique and the crosswise model.
    Höglinger M; Jann B
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(8):e0201770. PubMed ID: 30106973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Infidelity in heterosexual couples: demographic, interpersonal, and personality-related predictors of extradyadic sex.
    Mark KP; Janssen E; Milhausen RR
    Arch Sex Behav; 2011 Oct; 40(5):971-82. PubMed ID: 21667234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Assessing the validity of two indirect questioning techniques: A Stochastic Lie Detector versus the Crosswise Model.
    Hoffmann A; Musch J
    Behav Res Methods; 2016 Sep; 48(3):1032-46. PubMed ID: 26182857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Not all affairs are created equal: emotional involvement with an extradyadic partner.
    Allen ES; Rhoades GK
    J Sex Marital Ther; 2008; 34(1):51-65. PubMed ID: 18396729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Relationship problems and extradyadic romantic and sexual activity in a web-sample of Norwegian men and women.
    Træen B; Thuen F
    Scand J Psychol; 2013 Apr; 54(2):137-45. PubMed ID: 23252347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A Comparison of Sexual Health History and Practices among Monogamous and Consensually Nonmonogamous Sexual Partners.
    Lehmiller JJ
    J Sex Med; 2015 Oct; 12(10):2022-8. PubMed ID: 26395880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Nothing but the truth? Effects of faking on the validity of the crosswise model.
    Hoffmann A; Meisters J; Musch J
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(10):e0258603. PubMed ID: 34714838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Changes in the Sexual Relationship and Relationship Adjustment Precede Extradyadic Sexual Involvement.
    Scott SB; Parsons A; Post KM; Stanley SM; Markman HJ; Rhoades GK
    Arch Sex Behav; 2017 Feb; 46(2):395-406. PubMed ID: 27473073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Sexual infidelity in China: prevalence and gender-specific correlates.
    Zhang N; Parish WL; Huang Y; Pan S
    Arch Sex Behav; 2012 Aug; 41(4):861-73. PubMed ID: 22544304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Detecting nonadherence without loss in efficiency: A simple extension of the crosswise model.
    Heck DW; Hoffmann A; Moshagen M
    Behav Res Methods; 2018 Oct; 50(5):1895-1905. PubMed ID: 28916924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Predictors of extradyadic sexual involvement in unmarried opposite-sex relationships.
    Maddox Shaw AM; Rhoades GK; Allen ES; Stanley SM; Markman HJ
    J Sex Res; 2013; 50(6):598-610. PubMed ID: 22524318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Understanding changes in sexual activity among young metropolitan men: 1979-1995.
    Ku L; Sonenstein FL; Lindberg LD; Bradner CH; Boggess S; Pleck JH
    Fam Plann Perspect; 1998; 30(6):256-62. PubMed ID: 9859015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. On the comprehensibility and perceived privacy protection of indirect questioning techniques.
    Hoffmann A; Waubert de Puiseau B; Schmidt AF; Musch J
    Behav Res Methods; 2017 Aug; 49(4):1470-1483. PubMed ID: 27631988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. "We Agree and Now Everything Goes My Way": Consensual Sexual Nonmonogamy, Extradyadic Sex, and Relationship Satisfaction.
    Rodrigues D; Lopes D; Pereira M
    Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw; 2016 Jun; 19(6):373-9. PubMed ID: 27327064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Determinants of extramarital sex by men in Tanzania: a case study of Mbeya region.
    Mbago MC; Sichona FJ
    SAHARA J; 2010 Dec; 7(4):33-8. PubMed ID: 21409309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.