These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

349 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27165171)

  • 1. Intertrial priming due to distractor repetition is eliminated in homogeneous contexts.
    Feldmann-Wüstefeld T; Schubö A
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2016 Oct; 78(7):1935-47. PubMed ID: 27165171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Rewarded visual items capture attention only in heterogeneous contexts.
    Feldmann-Wüstefeld T; Brandhofer R; Schubö A
    Psychophysiology; 2016 Jul; 53(7):1063-73. PubMed ID: 26997364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Target features and target-distractor relation are both primed in visual search.
    Meeter M; Olivers CN
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2014 Apr; 76(3):682-94. PubMed ID: 24415176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. How visual working memory contents influence priming of visual attention.
    Carlisle NB; Kristjánsson Á
    Psychol Res; 2018 Sep; 82(5):833-839. PubMed ID: 28405777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Priming of pop-out modulates attentional target selection in visual search: behavioural and electrophysiological evidence.
    Eimer M; Kiss M; Cheung T
    Vision Res; 2010 Jun; 50(14):1353-61. PubMed ID: 19895829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Feature intertrial priming biases attentional priority: Evidence from the capture-probe paradigm.
    Wirth BE; Ramgir A; Lamy D
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2023 Aug; 49(8):1145-1157. PubMed ID: 37338430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Intertrial priming of pop-out search influences the shift, skew, and dispersion of response time distributions.
    Burnham BR; Cilento JJ; Hanley B
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2015 Aug; 77(6):1930-44. PubMed ID: 25896123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The role of search difficulty in intertrial feature priming.
    Lamy D; Zivony A; Yashar A
    Vision Res; 2011 Oct; 51(19):2099-109. PubMed ID: 21784093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Feature-based attentional control for distractor suppression.
    Kim S; Cho YS
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2024 May; 86(4):1075-1085. PubMed ID: 38418806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Saliency affects attentional capture and suppression of abrupt-onset and color singleton distractors: Evidence from event-related potential studies.
    Chen X; Xu B; Chen Y; Zeng X; Zhang Y; Fu S
    Psychophysiology; 2023 Aug; 60(8):e14290. PubMed ID: 36946491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Multiple attentional control settings at distinct locations without the confounding of repetition priming.
    Cho SA; Cho YS
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2018 Oct; 80(7):1718-1730. PubMed ID: 29959663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Intertrial target-feature changes do not lead to more distraction by singletons: target uncertainty does.
    Lamy D; Yashar A
    Vision Res; 2008 May; 48(10):1274-9. PubMed ID: 18395767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Response retrieval in a go/no-go priming-of-popout task.
    Burnham BR
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2013 Dec; 20(6):1187-94. PubMed ID: 23595351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effect of task set-modulating attentional capture depends on the distractor cost in visual search: evidence from N2pc.
    Zhao D; Liang S; Jin Z; Li L
    Neuroreport; 2014 Jul; 25(10):737-42. PubMed ID: 24840929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Visual search for feature singletons: multiple mechanisms produce sequence effects in visual search.
    Rangelov D; Müller HJ; Zehetleitner M
    J Vis; 2013 Aug; 13(3):. PubMed ID: 23912066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Intertrial priming of popout search on visual prior entry.
    Burnham BR
    J Vis; 2015; 15(14):8. PubMed ID: 26473317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Can intertrial priming account for the similarity effect in visual search?
    Becker SI; Ansorge U; Horstmann G
    Vision Res; 2009 Jul; 49(14):1738-56. PubMed ID: 19358862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Refining the dual-stage account of intertrial feature priming: does motor response or response feature matter?
    Yashar A; Lamy D
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2011 Oct; 73(7):2160-7. PubMed ID: 21769533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Does it help to expect distraction? Attentional capture is attenuated by high distractor frequency but not by trial-to-trial predictability.
    Bogaerts L; van Moorselaar D; Theeuwes J
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2022 Mar; 48(3):246-261. PubMed ID: 35130015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Oculomotor capture by colour singletons depends on intertrial priming.
    Becker SI
    Vision Res; 2010 Oct; 50(21):2116-26. PubMed ID: 20691720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.