1400 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27165622)
1. Neonatal health including congenital malformation risk of 1072 children born after vitrified embryo transfer.
Belva F; Bonduelle M; Roelants M; Verheyen G; Van Landuyt L
Hum Reprod; 2016 Jul; 31(7):1610-20. PubMed ID: 27165622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Obstetric and neonatal outcomes after transfer of vitrified early cleavage embryos.
Liu SY; Teng B; Fu J; Li X; Zheng Y; Sun XX
Hum Reprod; 2013 Aug; 28(8):2093-100. PubMed ID: 23569081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Clinical outcomes following cryopreservation of blastocysts by vitrification or slow freezing: a population-based cohort study.
Li Z; Wang YA; Ledger W; Edgar DH; Sullivan EA
Hum Reprod; 2014 Dec; 29(12):2794-801. PubMed ID: 25316444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Perinatal and maternal outcome after vitrification of blastocysts: a Nordic study in singletons from the CoNARTaS group.
Ginström Ernstad E; Spangmose AL; Opdahl S; Henningsen AA; Romundstad LB; Tiitinen A; Gissler M; Wennerholm UB; Pinborg A; Bergh C; Malchau SS
Hum Reprod; 2019 Nov; 34(11):2282-2289. PubMed ID: 31687765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Birthweight of singletons born after cleavage-stage or blastocyst transfer in fresh and warming cycles.
De Vos A; Santos-Ribeiro S; Van Landuyt L; Van de Velde H; Tournaye H; Verheyen G
Hum Reprod; 2018 Feb; 33(2):196-201. PubMed ID: 29206936
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Perinatal outcomes of singletons following vitrification versus slow-freezing of embryos: a multicenter cohort study using propensity score analysis.
Gu F; Li S; Zheng L; Gu J; Li T; Du H; Gao C; Ding C; Quan S; Zhou C; Li P; Xu Y
Hum Reprod; 2019 Sep; 34(9):1788-1798. PubMed ID: 31407797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Obstetric and neonatal outcome of ART in patients with polycystic ovary syndrome: IVM of oocytes versus controlled ovarian stimulation.
Mostinckx L; Segers I; Belva F; Buyl R; Santos-Ribeiro S; Blockeel C; Smitz J; Anckaert E; Tournaye H; De Vos M
Hum Reprod; 2019 Aug; 34(8):1595-1607. PubMed ID: 31347678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Neonatal outcome and birth defects in 6623 singletons born following minimal ovarian stimulation and vitrified versus fresh single embryo transfer.
Kato O; Kawasaki N; Bodri D; Kuroda T; Kawachiya S; Kato K; Takehara Y
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2012 Mar; 161(1):46-50. PubMed ID: 22200255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Body composition and blood pressure in 6-year-old singletons born after pre-implantation genetic testing for monogenic and structural chromosomal aberrations: a matched cohort study.
Belva F; Roelants M; Kluijfhout S; Winter C; De Schrijver F; Desmyttere S; De Rycke M; Tournaye H; Liebaers I; Bonduelle M
Hum Reprod Open; 2018; 2018(4):hoy013. PubMed ID: 30895254
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Neonatal outcome and congenital malformations in children born after ICSI with testicular or epididymal sperm: a controlled national cohort study.
Fedder J; Loft A; Parner ET; Rasmussen S; Pinborg A
Hum Reprod; 2013 Jan; 28(1):230-40. PubMed ID: 23154066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Fertility and neonatal outcomes of embryos achieving blastulation on Day 7: are they of clinical value?
Du T; Wang Y; Fan Y; Zhang S; Yan Z; Yu W; Xi Q; Chen Q; Mol BW; Lyu Q; Kuang Y
Hum Reprod; 2018 Jun; 33(6):1038-1051. PubMed ID: 29669005
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Perinatal outcomes in children born after fresh or frozen embryo transfer using donated oocytes.
Rafael F; Robles GM; Navarro AT; Garrido N; Garcia-Velasco JA; Bosch E; Nunes SG; Soares SR; Santos-Ribeiro S
Hum Reprod; 2022 Jun; 37(7):1642-1651. PubMed ID: 35451027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A comparison of perinatal outcomes following fresh blastocyst or cleavage stage embryo transfer in singletons and twins and between singleton siblings.
Raja EA; Bhattacharya S; Maheshwari A; McLernon DJ
Hum Reprod Open; 2023; 2023(2):hoad003. PubMed ID: 36909797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Obstetric and perinatal risks in 4601 singletons and 884 twins conceived after fresh blastocyst transfers: a Nordic study from the CoNARTaS group.
Spangmose AL; Ginström Ernstad E; Malchau S; Forman J; Tiitinen A; Gissler M; Opdahl S; Romundstad LB; Bergh C; Wennerholm UB; Henningsen AA; Pinborg A
Hum Reprod; 2020 Apr; 35(4):805-815. PubMed ID: 32294185
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Is large for gestational age in singletons born after frozen embryo transfer associated with freezing technique or endometrial preparation protocol? A longitudinal national French study.
Hesters L; Sermondade N; Lambert C; Pouly JL; Pereira B; Lucas C; Levy R; Brugnon F;
Hum Reprod; 2024 Apr; 39(4):724-732. PubMed ID: 38384249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Neonatal and maternal outcome after blastocyst transfer: a population-based registry study.
Ginström Ernstad E; Bergh C; Khatibi A; Källén KB; Westlander G; Nilsson S; Wennerholm UB
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Mar; 214(3):378.e1-378.e10. PubMed ID: 26928152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Large baby syndrome in singletons born after frozen embryo transfer (FET): is it due to maternal factors or the cryotechnique?
Pinborg A; Henningsen AA; Loft A; Malchau SS; Forman J; Andersen AN
Hum Reprod; 2014 Mar; 29(3):618-27. PubMed ID: 24413766
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Elective freezing of embryos versus fresh embryo transfer in IVF: a multicentre randomized controlled trial in the UK (E-Freeze).
Maheshwari A; Bell JL; Bhide P; Brison D; Child T; Chong HY; Cheong Y; Cole C; Coomarasamy A; Cutting R; Hardy P; Hamoda H; Juszczak E; Khalaf Y; Kurinczuk JJ; Lavery S; Linsell L; Macklon N; Mathur R; Pundir J; Raine-Fenning N; Rajkohwa M; Scotland G; Stanbury K; Troup S; Bhattacharya S
Hum Reprod; 2022 Mar; 37(3):476-487. PubMed ID: 34999830
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Pregnancy and birth outcomes following fresh or vitrified embryo transfer according to blastocyst morphology and expansion stage, and culturing strategy for delayed development.
Wirleitner B; Schuff M; Stecher A; Murtinger M; Vanderzwalmen P
Hum Reprod; 2016 Aug; 31(8):1685-95. PubMed ID: 27270972
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Definition of a clinical strategy to enhance the efficacy, efficiency and safety of egg donation cycles with imported vitrified oocytes.
Rienzi L; Cimadomo D; Maggiulli R; Vaiarelli A; Dusi L; Buffo L; Amendola MG; Colamaria S; Giuliani M; Bruno G; Stoppa M; Ubaldi FM
Hum Reprod; 2020 Apr; 35(4):785-795. PubMed ID: 32240287
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
