These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

330 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27166016)

  • 1. Shifting the Split Reflectors to Enhance Stone Fragmentation of Shock Wave Lithotripsy.
    Wang JC; Zhou Y
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2016 Aug; 42(8):1876-89. PubMed ID: 27166016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Suppression of large intraluminal bubble expansion in shock wave lithotripsy without compromising stone comminution: methodology and in vitro experiments.
    Zhong P; Zhou Y
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 Dec; 110(6):3283-91. PubMed ID: 11785829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Quantitative measurements of acoustic emissions from cavitation at the surface of a stone in response to a lithotripter shock wave.
    Chitnis PV; Cleveland RO
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2006 Apr; 119(4):1929-32. PubMed ID: 16642802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Reduction of bubble cavitation by modifying the diffraction wave from a lithotripter aperture.
    Zhou Y
    J Endourol; 2012 Aug; 26(8):1075-84. PubMed ID: 22332839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of Broad vs Narrow Focal Width Lithotripter Fields.
    Xing Y; Chen TT; Simmons WN; Sankin G; Cocks FH; Lipkin ME; Preminger GM; Zhong P
    J Endourol; 2017 May; 31(5):502-509. PubMed ID: 28340536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Modified shock waves for extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy: a simulation based on the Gilmore formulation.
    Canseco G; de Icaza-Herrera M; Fernández F; Loske AM
    Ultrasonics; 2011 Oct; 51(7):803-10. PubMed ID: 21459398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Improvement of stone fragmentation during shock-wave lithotripsy using a combined EH/PEAA shock-wave generator-in vitro experiments.
    Xi X; Zhong P
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2000 Mar; 26(3):457-67. PubMed ID: 10773377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effects of Stone Size on the Comminution Process and Efficiency in Shock Wave Lithotripsy.
    Zhang Y; Nault I; Mitran S; Iversen ES; Zhong P
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2016 Nov; 42(11):2662-2675. PubMed ID: 27515177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Stone comminution correlates with the average peak pressure incident on a stone during shock wave lithotripsy.
    Smith N; Zhong P
    J Biomech; 2012 Oct; 45(15):2520-5. PubMed ID: 22935690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Reduction of tissue injury in shock-wave lithotripsy by using an acoustic diode.
    Zhu S; Dreyer T; Liebler M; Riedlinger R; Preminger GM; Zhong P
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2004 May; 30(5):675-82. PubMed ID: 15183234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effect of lithotripter focal width on stone comminution in shock wave lithotripsy.
    Qin J; Simmons WN; Sankin G; Zhong P
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Apr; 127(4):2635-45. PubMed ID: 20370044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The effect of treatment strategy on stone comminution efficiency in shock wave lithotripsy.
    Zhou Y; Cocks FH; Preminger GM; Zhong P
    J Urol; 2004 Jul; 172(1):349-54. PubMed ID: 15201809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of electrohydraulic lithotripters with rigid and pressure-release ellipsoidal reflectors. I. Acoustic fields.
    Bailey MR; Blackstock DT; Cleveland RO; Crum LA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1998 Oct; 104(4):2517-24. PubMed ID: 10491712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Mechanical haemolysis in shock wave lithotripsy (SWL): II. In vitro cell lysis due to shear.
    Lokhandwalla M; McAteer JA; Williams JC; Sturtevant B
    Phys Med Biol; 2001 Apr; 46(4):1245-64. PubMed ID: 11324963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluation of a bifocal reflector on a clinical lithotripter.
    Loske AM; Prieto FE; Gutierrez J; Zendejas H; Saita A; Velez Gomez E
    J Endourol; 2004 Feb; 18(1):7-15; discussion 15-6. PubMed ID: 15006046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Pressure-release versus rigid reflector for extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy.
    Loske AM; Prieto FE
    J Endourol; 2002 Jun; 16(5):273-80. PubMed ID: 12184076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Suppression of large intraluminal bubble expansion in shock wave lithotripsy without compromising stone comminution: refinement of reflector geometry.
    Zhou Y; Zhong P
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2003 Jan; 113(1):586-97. PubMed ID: 12558294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Size and location of defects at the coupling interface affect lithotripter performance.
    Li G; Williams JC; Pishchalnikov YA; Liu Z; McAteer JA
    BJU Int; 2012 Dec; 110(11 Pt C):E871-7. PubMed ID: 22938566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Bifocal reflector for electrohydraulic lithotripters.
    Prieto FE; Loske AM
    J Endourol; 1999 Mar; 13(2):65-75. PubMed ID: 10213098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Modeling elastic wave propagation in kidney stones with application to shock wave lithotripsy.
    Cleveland RO; Sapozhnikov OA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2005 Oct; 118(4):2667-76. PubMed ID: 16266186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.