These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

84 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2716699)

  • 1. Contrast enhancement of noisy images by windowing: limitations due to the finite dynamic range of the display system.
    Metz CE; Chan HP; Doi K; Shen JH
    Med Phys; 1989; 16(2):170-8. PubMed ID: 2716699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Digital image processing: effect on detectability of simulated low-contrast radiographic patterns.
    Ishida M; Doi K; Loo LN; Metz CE; Lehr JL
    Radiology; 1984 Feb; 150(2):569-75. PubMed ID: 6691118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Investigation of basic imaging properties in digital radiography. 8. Detection of simulated low-contrast objects in digital subtraction angiographic images.
    Ohara K; Chan HP; Doi K; Giger ML; Fujita H
    Med Phys; 1986; 13(3):304-11. PubMed ID: 3724689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. On the noise variance of a digital mammography system.
    Burgess A
    Med Phys; 2004 Jul; 31(7):1987-95. PubMed ID: 15305451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Investigation of basic imaging properties in digital radiography. 9. Effect of displayed grey levels on signal detection.
    Giger ML; Ohara K; Doi K
    Med Phys; 1986; 13(3):312-8. PubMed ID: 3724690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Signal detectability in digital radiography: spatial domain figures of merit.
    Gagne RM; Boswell JS; Myers KJ
    Med Phys; 2003 Aug; 30(8):2180-93. PubMed ID: 12945984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Image quality performance of liquid crystal display systems: influence of display resolution, magnification and window settings on contrast-detail detection.
    Bacher K; Smeets P; De Hauwere A; Voet T; Duyck P; Verstraete K; Thierens H
    Eur J Radiol; 2006 Jun; 58(3):471-9. PubMed ID: 16442770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Display equalization: a new display method for portal images.
    Moseley J; Munro P
    Med Phys; 1993; 20(1):99-102. PubMed ID: 8455519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Noise content analysis in clinical digital images.
    Chuang KS; Liu BJ; Huang HK; Yonekawa H; Sankaran A
    Radiographics; 1994 Mar; 14(2):397-403; discussion 404-5. PubMed ID: 8190962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Contrast mapping and evaluation for electronic X-ray images on CRT display monitor.
    Suzuki J; Furukawa I; Ono S; Kitamura M; Ando Y
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 1997 Dec; 16(6):772-84. PubMed ID: 9533578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Simulation of dose reduction in tomosynthesis.
    Svalkvist A; Båth M
    Med Phys; 2010 Jan; 37(1):258-69. PubMed ID: 20175489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Digital and conventional chest images: observer performance with Film Digital Radiography System.
    Goodman LR; Foley WD; Wilson CR; Rimm AA; Lawson TL
    Radiology; 1986 Jan; 158(1):27-33. PubMed ID: 3940392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Imaging properties of digital magnification radiography.
    Boyce SJ; Samei E
    Med Phys; 2006 Apr; 33(4):984-96. PubMed ID: 16696475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluation of analog contrast enhancement and digital unsharp masking in low-contrast portal images.
    Weiser JC; Gur D; Gennari RC; Deutsch M
    Med Phys; 1990; 17(1):122-5. PubMed ID: 2308541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. AEC set-up optimisation with computed radiography imaging.
    Mazzocchi S; Belli G; Busoni S; Gori C; Menchi I; Salucci P; Taddeucci A; Zatelli G
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 117(1-3):169-73. PubMed ID: 16461503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Characteristics and control of contrast in CT.
    Barnes JE
    Radiographics; 1992 Jul; 12(4):825-37. PubMed ID: 1636042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Validation of MTF measurement for digital mammography quality control.
    Carton AK; Vandenbroucke D; Struye L; Maidment AD; Kao YH; Albert M; Bosmans H; Marchal G
    Med Phys; 2005 Jun; 32(6):1684-95. PubMed ID: 16013727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The evolution of digital radiography: from storage phosphors to flat-panel detectors.
    Porcelli A; Maggi F; Spalvieri S; Meduri A; Marano P
    Rays; 2003; 28(1):5-12. PubMed ID: 14509175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effect of pixel size on detectability of low-contrast signals in digital radiography.
    Giger ML; Doi K
    J Opt Soc Am A; 1987 May; 4(5):966-75. PubMed ID: 3598748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Visual perception and image display terminals.
    Kundel HL
    Radiol Clin North Am; 1986 Mar; 24(1):69-78. PubMed ID: 3961130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.