BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

490 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27167725)

  • 1. Direct and indirect impacts of crop-livestock organization on mixed crop-livestock systems sustainability: a model-based study.
    Sneessens I; Veysset P; Benoit M; Lamadon A; Brunschwig G
    Animal; 2016 Nov; 10(11):1911-1922. PubMed ID: 27167725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Mixed crop-livestock systems: an economic and environmental-friendly way of farming?
    Ryschawy J; Choisis N; Choisis JP; Joannon A; Gibon A
    Animal; 2012 Oct; 6(10):1722-30. PubMed ID: 22717157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Paths to last in mixed crop-livestock farming: lessons from an assessment of farm trajectories of change.
    Ryschawy J; Choisis N; Choisis JP; Gibon A
    Animal; 2013 Apr; 7(4):673-81. PubMed ID: 23190699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Mixed crop-livestock farming systems: a sustainable way to produce beef? Commercial farms results, questions and perspectives.
    Veysset P; Lherm M; Bébin D; Roulenc M
    Animal; 2014 Aug; 8(8):1218-28. PubMed ID: 24589421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Nitrogen flow characteristic and use efficiency in mixed crop-livestock system in North China Plain: Hebei Jinlong Circular Agriculture Farm as an example].
    Shi PF; Zheng YY; Zhao P; Yang DY; Jia L; Wang GY
    Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao; 2017 Apr; 28(4):1281-1288. PubMed ID: 29741326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Review: Role of herbivores in sustainable agriculture in Sub-Saharan Africa.
    Ayantunde AA; Duncan AJ; van Wijk MT; Thorne P
    Animal; 2018 Dec; 12(s2):s199-s209. PubMed ID: 30139396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Can farmers mitigate environmental impacts through combined production of food, fuel and feed? A consequential life cycle assessment of integrated mixed crop-livestock system with a green biorefinery.
    Parajuli R; Dalgaard T; Birkved M
    Sci Total Environ; 2018 Apr; 619-620():127-143. PubMed ID: 29145050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Review: Associations among goods, impacts and ecosystem services provided by livestock farming.
    Dumont B; Ryschawy J; Duru M; Benoit M; Chatellier V; Delaby L; Donnars C; Dupraz P; Lemauviel-Lavenant S; Méda B; Vollet D; Sabatier R
    Animal; 2019 Aug; 13(8):1773-1784. PubMed ID: 30333070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Relay cropping as a sustainable approach: problems and opportunities for sustainable crop production.
    Tanveer M; Anjum SA; Hussain S; Cerdà A; Ashraf U
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2017 Mar; 24(8):6973-6988. PubMed ID: 28083744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Combining beef cattle and sheep in an organic system. II. Benefits for economic and environmental performance.
    Benoit M; Vazeille K; Jury C; Troquier C; Veysset P; Prache S
    Animal; 2023 Apr; 17(4):100759. PubMed ID: 36966689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Commercial integrated crop-livestock systems achieve comparable crop yields to specialized production systems: A meta-analysis.
    Peterson CA; Deiss L; Gaudin ACM
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(5):e0231840. PubMed ID: 32379773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Current available strategies to mitigate greenhouse gas emissions in livestock systems: an animal welfare perspective.
    Llonch P; Haskell MJ; Dewhurst RJ; Turner SP
    Animal; 2017 Feb; 11(2):274-284. PubMed ID: 27406001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Cow-calf reproductive, genetic, and nutritional management to improve the sustainability of whole beef production systems.
    White RR; Brady M; Capper JL; McNamara JP; Johnson KA
    J Anim Sci; 2015 Jun; 93(6):3197-211. PubMed ID: 26115306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Development of livestock production in the tropics: farm and farmers' perspectives.
    Oosting SJ; Udo HM; Viets TC
    Animal; 2014 Aug; 8(8):1238-48. PubMed ID: 24673769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Eco-efficient approaches to land management: a case for increased integration of crop and animal production systems.
    Wilkins RJ
    Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 2008 Feb; 363(1491):517-25. PubMed ID: 17652073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Water footprint assessment of sheep farming systems based on farm survey data.
    Ibidhi R; Ben Salem H
    Animal; 2019 Feb; 13(2):407-416. PubMed ID: 29983129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Livestock intensification and the influence of dietary change: A calorie-based assessment of competition for crop production.
    Davis KF; D'Odorico P
    Sci Total Environ; 2015 Dec; 538():817-23. PubMed ID: 26340584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Farm systems assessment of bioenergy feedstock production: Integrating bio-economic models and life cycle analysis approaches.
    Glithero NJ; Ramsden SJ; Wilson P
    Agric Syst; 2012 Jun; 109():53-64. PubMed ID: 25540473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Review: An integrated graphical tool for analysing impacts and services provided by livestock farming.
    Ryschawy J; Dumont B; Therond O; Donnars C; Hendrickson J; Benoit M; Duru M
    Animal; 2019 Aug; 13(8):1760-1772. PubMed ID: 30827290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Exploiting Co-Benefits of Increased Rice Production and Reduced Greenhouse Gas Emission through Optimized Crop and Soil Management.
    An N; Fan M; Zhang F; Christie P; Yang J; Huang J; Guo S; Shi X; Tang Q; Peng J; Zhong X; Sun Y; Lv S; Jiang R; Dobermann A
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(10):e0140023. PubMed ID: 26452155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 25.