BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

196 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27167853)

  • 1. Double dissociation of configural and featural face processing on P1 and P2 components as a function of spatial attention.
    Wang H; Guo S; Fu S
    Psychophysiology; 2016 Aug; 53(8):1165-73. PubMed ID: 27167853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Spatial attention modulates the temporal sequence of hemispheric asymmetry in configural and featural face processing.
    Wang H; Fu S
    Neuropsychologia; 2018 Mar; 111():269-275. PubMed ID: 29374552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Configural and featural face processing are differently modulated by attentional resources at early stages: an event-related potential study with rapid serial visual presentation.
    Wang H; Sun P; Ip C; Zhao X; Fu S
    Brain Res; 2015 Mar; 1602():75-84. PubMed ID: 25601005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cultural Differences in the Time Course of Configural and Featural Processing for Own-race Faces.
    Wang H; Qiu R; Li W; Li S; Fu S
    Neuroscience; 2020 Oct; 446():157-170. PubMed ID: 32891705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Spatial Mechanisms within the Dorsal Visual Pathway Contribute to the Configural Processing of Faces.
    Zachariou V; Nikas CV; Safiullah ZN; Gotts SJ; Ungerleider LG
    Cereb Cortex; 2017 Aug; 27(8):4124-4138. PubMed ID: 27522076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Configural but Not Featural Face Information Is Associated With Automatic Processing.
    Wang H; Chen E; Li J; Ji F; Lian Y; Fu S
    Front Hum Neurosci; 2022; 16():884823. PubMed ID: 35496070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Featural and configural face processing in adults and infants: a behavioral and electrophysiological investigation.
    Scott LS
    Perception; 2006; 35(8):1107-28. PubMed ID: 17076069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Spatial attention modulates early face processing.
    Feng W; Martinez A; Pitts M; Luo YJ; Hillyard SA
    Neuropsychologia; 2012 Dec; 50(14):3461-8. PubMed ID: 23017595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Perceptual separability of featural and configural information in congenital prosopagnosia.
    Kimchi R; Behrmann M; Avidan G; Amishav R
    Cogn Neuropsychol; 2012; 29(5-6):447-63. PubMed ID: 23428081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Spatial-frequency thresholds for configural and featural discriminations in upright and inverted faces.
    Watier NN; Collin CA; Boutet I
    Perception; 2010; 39(4):502-13. PubMed ID: 20514998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Featural and configural face processing differentially modulate ERP components.
    Mercure E; Dick F; Johnson MH
    Brain Res; 2008 Nov; 1239():162-70. PubMed ID: 18722354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Losing face: impaired discrimination of featural and configural information in the mouth region of an inverted face.
    Tanaka JW; Kaiser MD; Hagen S; Pierce LJ
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2014 May; 76(4):1000-14. PubMed ID: 24477773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Dissociation between the neural correlates of conscious face perception and visual attention.
    Navajas J; Nitka AW; Quian Quiroga R
    Psychophysiology; 2017 Aug; 54(8):1138-1150. PubMed ID: 28444975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Processing of featural and configural aspects of faces is lateralized in dorsolateral prefrontal cortex: a TMS study.
    Renzi C; Schiavi S; Carbon CC; Vecchi T; Silvanto J; Cattaneo Z
    Neuroimage; 2013 Jul; 74():45-51. PubMed ID: 23435211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Faces elicit different scanning patterns depending on task demands.
    Boutet I; Lemieux CL; Goulet MA; Collin CA
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2017 May; 79(4):1050-1063. PubMed ID: 28185225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Face Context Influences Local Part Processing: An ERP Study.
    Zhang H; Sun Y; Zhao L
    Perception; 2017 Sep; 46(9):1090-1104. PubMed ID: 28152650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Neural mechanisms of face recognition: an event-related potential study].
    Tobimatsu S
    Brain Nerve; 2012 Jul; 64(7):717-26. PubMed ID: 22764343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Featural and configural face processing strategies: evidence from a functional magnetic resonance imaging study.
    Lobmaier JS; Klaver P; Loenneker T; Martin E; Mast FW
    Neuroreport; 2008 Feb; 19(3):287-91. PubMed ID: 18303568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The special status of sad infant faces: age and valence differences in adults' cortical face processing.
    Colasante T; Mossad SI; Dudek J; Haley DW
    Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci; 2017 Apr; 12(4):586-595. PubMed ID: 27998995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Emotion recognition: the role of featural and configural face information.
    Bombari D; Schmid PC; Schmid Mast M; Birri S; Mast FW; Lobmaier JS
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2013; 66(12):2426-42. PubMed ID: 23679155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.