These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

196 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27167853)

  • 21. The role of the motion cue in the dynamic gaze-cueing effect: A study of the lateralized ERPs.
    Zhang X; Zhang Z; Zhang Z; Tang Y; Liu W
    Neuropsychologia; 2019 Feb; 124():151-160. PubMed ID: 30582945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Early ERP components differentially extract facial features: evidence for spatial frequency-and-contrast detectors.
    Nakashima T; Kaneko K; Goto Y; Abe T; Mitsudo T; Ogata K; Makinouchi A; Tobimatsu S
    Neurosci Res; 2008 Dec; 62(4):225-35. PubMed ID: 18809442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The Time Sequence of Face Spatial Frequency Differs During Working Memory Encoding and Retrieval Stages.
    Wang A; Chen E; Zhang H; Borjigin CH; Wang H
    Front Psychol; 2022; 13():853992. PubMed ID: 35668961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The cerebral correlates of subliminal emotions: an eleoencephalographic study with emotional hybrid faces.
    Prete G; Capotosto P; Zappasodi F; Laeng B; Tommasi L
    Eur J Neurosci; 2015 Dec; 42(11):2952-62. PubMed ID: 26370468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Features are also important: contributions of featural and configural processing to face recognition.
    Cabeza R; Kato T
    Psychol Sci; 2000 Sep; 11(5):429-33. PubMed ID: 11228917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Inverted, Upright, and Blurred Faces Are Not Immune to the Attentional Blink.
    Eagles S; Murphy K
    Perception; 2016 Aug; 45(8):893-909. PubMed ID: 27060179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Relative expertise affects N170 during selective attention to superimposed face-character images.
    Ip C; Wang H; Fu S
    Psychophysiology; 2017 Jul; 54(7):955-968. PubMed ID: 28383103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Tuning Attention to Object Categories: Spatially Global Effects of Attention to Faces in Visual Processing.
    Störmer VS; Cohen MA; Alvarez GA
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2019 Jul; 31(7):937-947. PubMed ID: 30912729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Two routes to face perception: evidence from psychophysics and computational modeling.
    Schwaninger A; Lobmaier JS; Wallraven C; Collishaw S
    Cogn Sci; 2009 Nov; 33(8):1413-40. PubMed ID: 21585511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Behavioral and ERP measures of holistic face processing in a composite task.
    Letourneau SM; Mitchell TV
    Brain Cogn; 2008 Jul; 67(2):234-45. PubMed ID: 18336979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Effects of repetition learning on upright, inverted and contrast-reversed face processing using ERPs.
    Itier RJ; Taylor MJ
    Neuroimage; 2004 Apr; 21(4):1518-32. PubMed ID: 15050576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Interfering with memory for faces: The cost of doing two things at once.
    Wammes JD; Fernandes MA
    Memory; 2016; 24(2):184-203. PubMed ID: 25621412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Face-sensitive brain responses in the first year of life.
    Conte S; Richards JE; Guy MW; Xie W; Roberts JE
    Neuroimage; 2020 May; 211():116602. PubMed ID: 32044434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Spatial-temporal analysis of face processing using an ERP study of the Thatcher illusion.
    Gu X; Li Y; Yang X; Zhu Y
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2007; 2007():2496-9. PubMed ID: 18002501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Neural activity associated with attention orienting triggered by implied action cues.
    Li K; Liu YJ; Qu F; Fu X
    Brain Res; 2016 Jul; 1642():353-363. PubMed ID: 27067186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The roles of featural and configural face processing in snap judgments of sexual orientation.
    Tabak JA; Zayas V
    PLoS One; 2012; 7(5):e36671. PubMed ID: 22629321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Attention to individual identities modulates face processing.
    Ruz M; Aranda C; Sarmiento BR; Sanabria D
    Exp Brain Res; 2015 May; 233(5):1491-502. PubMed ID: 25690863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Processing of task-irrelevant emotional faces impacted by implicit sequence learning.
    Peng M; Cai M; Zhou R
    Neuroreport; 2015 Dec; 26(17):1056-60. PubMed ID: 26445285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The respective role of low and high spatial frequencies in supporting configural and featural processing of faces.
    Goffaux V; Hault B; Michel C; Vuong QC; Rossion B
    Perception; 2005; 34(1):77-86. PubMed ID: 15773608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Aging Strikes the Self-Face Advantage in Featural Processing.
    Qian H; Wang Z; Yan L; Gao X
    Exp Aging Res; 2017; 43(4):379-390. PubMed ID: 28718751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.