These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

183 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27167853)

  • 41. Lip color affects ERP components in temporal face perception processing.
    Tanaka H
    J Integr Neurosci; 2021 Dec; 20(4):1029-1038. PubMed ID: 34997726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Spatiotemporal brain mapping of spatial attention effects on pattern-reversal ERPs.
    Di Russo F; Stella A; Spitoni G; Strappini F; Sdoia S; Galati G; Hillyard SA; Spinelli D; Pitzalis S
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2012 Jun; 33(6):1334-51. PubMed ID: 21500317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Effects of facial color on the subliminal processing of fearful faces.
    Nakajima K; Minami T; Nakauchi S
    Neuroscience; 2015 Dec; 310():472-85. PubMed ID: 26424379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. A novel BCI based on ERP components sensitive to configural processing of human faces.
    Zhang Y; Zhao Q; Jin J; Wang X; Cichocki A
    J Neural Eng; 2012 Apr; 9(2):026018. PubMed ID: 22414683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. The time course of individual face recognition: A pattern analysis of ERP signals.
    Nemrodov D; Niemeier M; Mok JNY; Nestor A
    Neuroimage; 2016 May; 132():469-476. PubMed ID: 26973169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Configural and featural discriminations use the same spatial frequencies: a model observer versus human observer analysis.
    Collin CA; Rainville S; Watier N; Boutet I
    Perception; 2014; 43(6):509-26. PubMed ID: 25154285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Electrophysiological evidence for temporal dissociation between spatial attention and sensory competition during human face processing.
    Jacques C; Rossion B
    Cereb Cortex; 2007 May; 17(5):1055-65. PubMed ID: 16772314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Understanding the role of configural processing in face emotion recognition in Parkinson's disease.
    Cousins R; Pettigrew A; Ferrie O; Hanley JR
    J Neuropsychol; 2021 Apr; 15 Suppl 1():8-26. PubMed ID: 32323929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Different time course of visuocortical signal changes to fear-conditioned faces with direct or averted gaze: a ssVEP study with single-trial analysis.
    Wieser MJ; Miskovic V; Rausch S; Keil A
    Neuropsychologia; 2014 Sep; 62():101-10. PubMed ID: 25050854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Recognizing degraded faces: the contribution of configural and featural cues.
    Gilad-Gutnick S; Sinha P
    Perception; 2012; 41(12):1497-511. PubMed ID: 23586289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Featural information is sufficient to produce a left cheek bias for happiness perception.
    Low JY; Lindell AK
    Brain Cogn; 2016 Aug; 107():10-5. PubMed ID: 27363004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Neural correlates of emotional intelligence in a visual emotional oddball task: an ERP study.
    Raz S; Dan O; Zysberg L
    Brain Cogn; 2014 Nov; 91():79-86. PubMed ID: 25265320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Featural versus configural face processing in a rare genetic disorder: Williams syndrome.
    Isaac L; Lincoln A
    J Intellect Disabil Res; 2011 Nov; 55(11):1034-42. PubMed ID: 21554469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. An other-race effect for configural and featural processing of faces: upper and lower face regions play different roles.
    Wang Z; Quinn PC; Tanaka JW; Yu X; Sun YH; Liu J; Pascalis O; Ge L; Lee K
    Front Psychol; 2015; 6():559. PubMed ID: 26005427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. The activation of visual face memory and explicit face recognition are delayed in developmental prosopagnosia.
    Parketny J; Towler J; Eimer M
    Neuropsychologia; 2015 Aug; 75():538-47. PubMed ID: 26169316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Deaf and hearing children: A comparison of face perception.
    He H; Zhang Y; Su M; Yi L; Lv J
    J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ; 2023 Mar; 28(2):127-135. PubMed ID: 36382413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Steady state visually evoked potential correlates of static and dynamic emotional face processing.
    Mayes AK; Pipingas A; Silberstein RB; Johnston P
    Brain Topogr; 2009 Nov; 22(3):145-57. PubMed ID: 19653091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Somatosensory spatial attention modulates amplitudes, latencies, and latency jitter of laser-evoked brain potentials.
    Franz M; Nickel MM; Ritter A; Miltner WH; Weiss T
    J Neurophysiol; 2015 Apr; 113(7):2760-8. PubMed ID: 25673731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Time course of spatial frequency integration in face perception: An ERP study.
    Jeantet C; Laprevote V; Schwan R; Schwitzer T; Maillard L; Lighezzolo-Alnot J; Caharel S
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2019 Sep; 143():105-115. PubMed ID: 31276696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Early temporal negativity is sensitive to perceived (rather than physical) facial identity.
    Faerber SJ; Kaufmann JM; Schweinberger SR
    Neuropsychologia; 2015 Aug; 75():132-42. PubMed ID: 26013406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.