BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

266 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27168323)

  • 1. The Role of Familiarity for Representations in Norm-Based Face Space.
    Faerber SJ; Kaufmann JM; Leder H; Martin EM; Schweinberger SR
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(5):e0155380. PubMed ID: 27168323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The P200 predominantly reflects distance-to-norm in face space whereas the N250 reflects activation of identity-specific representations of known faces.
    Wuttke SJ; Schweinberger SR
    Biol Psychol; 2019 Jan; 140():86-95. PubMed ID: 30529289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. What is typical is good: the influence of face typicality on perceived trustworthiness.
    Sofer C; Dotsch R; Wigboldus DH; Todorov A
    Psychol Sci; 2015 Jan; 26(1):39-47. PubMed ID: 25512052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. For Your Local Eyes Only: Culture-Specific Face Typicality Influences Perceptions of Trustworthiness.
    Sofer C; Dotsch R; Oikawa M; Oikawa H; Wigboldus DHJ; Todorov A
    Perception; 2017 Aug; 46(8):914-928. PubMed ID: 28152651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Differences between high and low performers in face recognition in electrophysiological correlates of face familiarity and distance-to-norm.
    Schroeger A; Ficco L; Wuttke SJ; Kaufmann JM; Schweinberger SR
    Biol Psychol; 2023 Sep; 182():108654. PubMed ID: 37549807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The Role of Familiarity on Viewpoint Adaptation for Self-Face and Other-Face Images.
    Nevi A; Cicali F; Caudek C
    Perception; 2016 Jul; 45(7):823-43. PubMed ID: 27165718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Familiarity breeds attraction: effects of exposure on the attractiveness of typical and distinctive faces.
    Peskin M; Newell FN
    Perception; 2004; 33(2):147-57. PubMed ID: 15109158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A familiarity disadvantage for remembering specific images of faces.
    Armann RG; Jenkins R; Burton AM
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2016 Apr; 42(4):571-80. PubMed ID: 26594877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Familiarity, memorability, and the effect of typicality on the recognition of faces.
    Vokey JR; Read JD
    Mem Cognit; 1992 May; 20(3):291-302. PubMed ID: 1508054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Familiar and unfamiliar face recognition: a review.
    Johnston RA; Edmonds AJ
    Memory; 2009 Jul; 17(5):577-96. PubMed ID: 19548173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Distinctiveness, typicality, and recollective experience in face recognition: a principal components analysis.
    Dewhurst SA; Hay DC; Wickham LH
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2005 Dec; 12(6):1032-7. PubMed ID: 16615324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Understanding face familiarity.
    Kramer RSS; Young AW; Burton AM
    Cognition; 2018 Mar; 172():46-58. PubMed ID: 29232594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Facial typicality and attractiveness reflect an ideal dimension of face structure.
    Trujillo LT; Anderson EM
    Cogn Psychol; 2023 Feb; 140():101541. PubMed ID: 36587465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Viewers base estimates of face matching accuracy on their own familiarity: Explaining the photo-ID paradox.
    Ritchie KL; Smith FG; Jenkins R; Bindemann M; White D; Burton AM
    Cognition; 2015 Aug; 141():161-9. PubMed ID: 25988915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The DalHouses: 100 new photographs of houses with ratings of typicality, familiarity, and degree of similarity to faces.
    Filliter JH; Glover JM; McMullen PA; Salmon JP; Johnson SA
    Behav Res Methods; 2016 Mar; 48(1):178-83. PubMed ID: 25675877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Happy faces are preferred regardless of familiarity--sad faces are preferred only when familiar.
    Liao HI; Shimojo S; Yeh SL
    Emotion; 2013 Jun; 13(3):391-6. PubMed ID: 23356560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Suppression of 12-Hz SSVEPs when viewing familiar faces: An electrophysiological index to detect recognition.
    Lui M; Lui KFH; Wong AC; Rosenfeld JP
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2018 Nov; 133():159-168. PubMed ID: 30318051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Early temporal negativity is sensitive to perceived (rather than physical) facial identity.
    Faerber SJ; Kaufmann JM; Schweinberger SR
    Neuropsychologia; 2015 Aug; 75():132-42. PubMed ID: 26013406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Idiosyncratic, Retinotopic Bias in Face Identification Modulated by Familiarity.
    Visconti di Oleggio Castello M; Taylor M; Cavanagh P; Gobbini MI
    eNeuro; 2018; 5(5):. PubMed ID: 30294669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Personal familiarity enhances sensitivity to horizontal structure during processing of face identity.
    Pachai MV; Sekuler AB; Bennett PJ; Schyns PG; Ramon M
    J Vis; 2017 Jun; 17(6):5. PubMed ID: 28593249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.