301 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2716839)
1. A view of misconduct in science.
Racker E
Nature; 1989 May; 339(6220):91-3. PubMed ID: 2716839
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Scientific misconduct in academia: a survey and analysis of applicable law.
Sise CB
San Diego Law Rev; 1991; 28(2):401-28. PubMed ID: 11651628
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Science needs vigilance not vigilantes.
Woolf PK
JAMA; 1988 Oct; 260(13):1939-40. PubMed ID: 3418857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Criminal liability for misconduct in scientific research.
Kuzma SM
Univ Mich J Law Reform; 1992; 25(2):357-421. PubMed ID: 11651584
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Policing fraud and deceit: the legal aspects of misconduct in scientific inquiry.
Protti M
J Infor Ethics; 1996; 5(1):59-71. PubMed ID: 11653390
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Deception in scientific research.
Woolf PK
Jurimetrics; 1988; 29(1):67-95. PubMed ID: 11654908
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Fraud squad moves in on universities.
Cross M; Connor S; Anderson I
New Sci; 1985 Jun; 106(1459):8. PubMed ID: 11655696
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Misconduct and fraud in research: social and legislative issues symposium of the Society of University Surgeons.
Simmons RL; Polk HC; Williams B; Mavroudis C
Surgery; 1991 Jul; 110(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 1866681
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Science comes to terms with the lessons of fraud.
Abbott A
Nature; 1999 Mar; 398(6722):13-7. PubMed ID: 10078516
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Fraud and sloppiness in science.
Schmaus W
Perspectives Prof; 1981; 1(3-4):1-4. PubMed ID: 11649374
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. The politics of research misconduct: congressional oversight, universities, and science.
LaFollette MC
J Higher Educ; 1994; 65(3):261-85. PubMed ID: 11653364
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Responding to scientific misconduct. Due process and prevention.
Mishkin B
JAMA; 1988 Oct; 260(13):1932-6. PubMed ID: 3418855
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Questions of scientific responsibility: the Baltimore case.
Lang S
Ethics Behav; 1993; 3(1):3-72. PubMed ID: 11653082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Definitions and boundaries of research misconduct: perspectives from a federal government viewpoint.
Price AR
J Higher Educ; 1994; 65(3):286-97. PubMed ID: 11653365
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Scientific misconduct and editorial and peer review processes.
Fox MF
J Higher Educ; 1994; 65(3):298-309. PubMed ID: 11653366
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Global trend: more science, more fraud.
Altman L; Broad WJ
N Y Times Web; 2005 Dec; ():F1, F6. PubMed ID: 16450465
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Misconduct and social control in science: issues, problems, solutions.
Fox MF; Braxton JM
J Higher Educ; 1994; 65(3):373-83. PubMed ID: 11653368
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Fraud and misrepresentation in research--whose responsibility?
Wigodsky HS
IRB; 1984; 6(2):1-5. PubMed ID: 11649536
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Teaching scientific integrity.
Gifford F
Centen Rev; 1994; 38(2):297-314. PubMed ID: 11656760
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Research universities and scientific misconduct -- history, policies, and the future.
Steneck NH
J Higher Educ; 1994; 65(3):310-30. PubMed ID: 11653367
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
