These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
234 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27169896)
1. Features that define the best ChIP-seq peak calling algorithms. Thomas R; Thomas S; Holloway AK; Pollard KS Brief Bioinform; 2017 May; 18(3):441-450. PubMed ID: 27169896 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. ChIP-chip versus ChIP-seq: lessons for experimental design and data analysis. Ho JW; Bishop E; Karchenko PV; Nègre N; White KP; Park PJ BMC Genomics; 2011 Feb; 12():134. PubMed ID: 21356108 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. ChIP-R: Assembling reproducible sets of ChIP-seq and ATAC-seq peaks from multiple replicates. Newell R; Pienaar R; Balderson B; Piper M; Essebier A; Bodén M Genomics; 2021 Jul; 113(4):1855-1866. PubMed ID: 33878366 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. PePr: a peak-calling prioritization pipeline to identify consistent or differential peaks from replicated ChIP-Seq data. Zhang Y; Lin YH; Johnson TD; Rozek LS; Sartor MA Bioinformatics; 2014 Sep; 30(18):2568-75. PubMed ID: 24894502 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A generalized linear model for peak calling in ChIP-Seq data. Xu J; Zhang Y J Comput Biol; 2012 Jun; 19(6):826-38. PubMed ID: 22533622 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Saturation analysis of ChIP-seq data for reproducible identification of binding peaks. Hansen P; Hecht J; Ibrahim DM; Krannich A; Truss M; Robinson PN Genome Res; 2015 Sep; 25(9):1391-400. PubMed ID: 26163319 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A novel statistical method for quantitative comparison of multiple ChIP-seq datasets. Chen L; Wang C; Qin ZS; Wu H Bioinformatics; 2015 Jun; 31(12):1889-96. PubMed ID: 25682068 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Is this the right normalization? A diagnostic tool for ChIP-seq normalization. Angelini C; Heller R; Volkinshtein R; Yekutieli D BMC Bioinformatics; 2015 May; 16():150. PubMed ID: 25957089 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Detecting differential peaks in ChIP-seq signals with ODIN. Allhoff M; Seré K; Chauvistré H; Lin Q; Zenke M; Costa IG Bioinformatics; 2014 Dec; 30(24):3467-75. PubMed ID: 25371479 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Improving analysis of transcription factor binding sites within ChIP-Seq data based on topological motif enrichment. Worsley Hunt R; Mathelier A; Del Peso L; Wasserman WW BMC Genomics; 2014 Jun; 15(1):472. PubMed ID: 24927817 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Differential peak calling of ChIP-seq signals with replicates with THOR. Allhoff M; Seré K; F Pires J; Zenke M; G Costa I Nucleic Acids Res; 2016 Nov; 44(20):e153. PubMed ID: 27484474 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A comparison of peak callers used for DNase-Seq data. Koohy H; Down TA; Spivakov M; Hubbard T PLoS One; 2014; 9(5):e96303. PubMed ID: 24810143 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. OccuPeak: ChIP-Seq peak calling based on internal background modelling. de Boer BA; van Duijvenboden K; van den Boogaard M; Christoffels VM; Barnett P; Ruijter JM PLoS One; 2014; 9(6):e99844. PubMed ID: 24936875 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The Triform algorithm: improved sensitivity and specificity in ChIP-Seq peak finding. Kornacker K; Rye MB; Håndstad T; Drabløs F BMC Bioinformatics; 2012 Jul; 13():176. PubMed ID: 22827163 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of four ChIP-Seq analytical algorithms using rice endosperm H3K27 trimethylation profiling data. Malone BM; Tan F; Bridges SM; Peng Z PLoS One; 2011; 6(9):e25260. PubMed ID: 21984925 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Decoding ChIP-seq with a double-binding signal refines binding peaks to single-nucleotides and predicts cooperative interaction. Gomes AL; Abeel T; Peterson M; Azizi E; Lyubetskaya A; Carvalho L; Galagan J Genome Res; 2014 Oct; 24(10):1686-97. PubMed ID: 25024162 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]