These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

70 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27170022)

  • 1. Variance functions, detectability and bias: a re-evaluation.
    Sadler WA
    Ann Clin Biochem; 2017 Mar; 54(2):286-288. PubMed ID: 27170022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Using the variance function to estimate limit of blank, limit of detection and their confidence intervals.
    Sadler WA
    Ann Clin Biochem; 2016 Jan; 53(Pt 1):141-9. PubMed ID: 25678668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The effect of sample size and bias on the reliability of estimates of error: a comparative study of Dahlberg's formula.
    Springate SD
    Eur J Orthod; 2012 Apr; 34(2):158-63. PubMed ID: 21447784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The impact of bias in MoM values on patient risk and screening performance for Down syndrome.
    Nix B; Wright D; Baker A
    Prenat Diagn; 2007 Sep; 27(9):840-5. PubMed ID: 17600858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Adjustment for baseline measurement error in randomized controlled trials induces bias.
    Chan SF; Macaskill P; Irwig L; Walter SD
    Control Clin Trials; 2004 Aug; 25(4):408-16. PubMed ID: 15296815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Separating Measurement Error and Signal in Environmental Data: Use of Replicates to Address Uncertainty.
    Furman M; Thomas KW; George BJ
    Environ Sci Technol; 2023 Oct; 57(41):15356-15365. PubMed ID: 37796641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A simulation study of sample size for multilevel logistic regression models.
    Moineddin R; Matheson FI; Glazier RH
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2007 Jul; 7():34. PubMed ID: 17634107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Power and Type I errors for pairwise comparisons of means in the unequal variances case.
    Ramsey PH; Ramsey PP
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2009 May; 62(Pt 2):263-81. PubMed ID: 18331666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A random coefficient degradation model with random sample size.
    Su C; Lu JC; Chen D; Hughes-Oliver JM
    Lifetime Data Anal; 1999 Jun; 5(2):173-83. PubMed ID: 10408183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The effect of parameter variability in the allometric projection of leaf growth rates for eelgrass (Zostera marina L.) II: the importance of data quality control procedures in bias reduction.
    Echavarría-Heras H; Leal-Ramírez C; Villa-Diharce E; Cazarez-Castro NR
    Theor Biol Med Model; 2015 Dec; 12():30. PubMed ID: 26627684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A latent variable model approach to estimating systematic bias in the oversampling method.
    Hauner KK; Zinbarg RE; Revelle W
    Behav Res Methods; 2014 Sep; 46(3):786-97. PubMed ID: 24142836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Statistical evaluation of several methods for cut-point determination of immunogenicity screening assay.
    Shen M; Dong X; Tsong Y
    J Biopharm Stat; 2015; 25(2):269-79. PubMed ID: 25356783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Filtered kriging for spatial data with heterogeneous measurement error variances.
    Christensen WF
    Biometrics; 2011 Sep; 67(3):947-57. PubMed ID: 21361891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Enriched designs for assessing discriminatory performance--analysis of bias and variance.
    Pinsky PF; Gallas B
    Stat Med; 2012 Mar; 31(6):501-15. PubMed ID: 22095795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Quality assessment of microarrays: visualization of spatial artifacts and quantitation of regional biases.
    Reimers M; Weinstein JN
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2005 Jul; 6():166. PubMed ID: 15992406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Synthesizing single-case studies: a Monte Carlo examination of a three-level meta-analytic model.
    Owens CM; Ferron JM
    Behav Res Methods; 2012 Sep; 44(3):795-805. PubMed ID: 22180105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Causal inference methods to assess safety upper bounds in randomized trials with noncompliance.
    Wang Y; Berlin JA; Pinheiro J; Wilcox MA
    Clin Trials; 2015 Jun; 12(3):265-75. PubMed ID: 25733675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Incomplete quality of life data in lung transplant research: comparing cross sectional, repeated measures ANOVA, and multi-level analysis.
    Vermeulen KM; Post WJ; Span MM; van der Bij W; Koëter GH; TenVergert EM
    Respir Res; 2005 Sep; 6(1):101. PubMed ID: 16150142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The detection of problem analytes in a single proficiency test challenge in the absence of the Health Care Financing Administration rule violations.
    Cembrowski GS; Hackney JR; Carey N
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1993 Apr; 117(4):437-43. PubMed ID: 8466413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Re-estimating sample size in cluster randomised trials with active recruitment within clusters.
    van Schie S; Moerbeek M
    Stat Med; 2014 Aug; 33(19):3253-68. PubMed ID: 24719285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.