391 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27171006)
1. Vinardo: A Scoring Function Based on Autodock Vina Improves Scoring, Docking, and Virtual Screening.
Quiroga R; Villarreal MA
PLoS One; 2016; 11(5):e0155183. PubMed ID: 27171006
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluation of consensus scoring methods for AutoDock Vina, smina and idock.
Masters L; Eagon S; Heying M
J Mol Graph Model; 2020 May; 96():107532. PubMed ID: 31991303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Machine learning optimization of cross docking accuracy.
Bjerrum EJ
Comput Biol Chem; 2016 Jun; 62():133-44. PubMed ID: 27179709
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A New, Improved Hybrid Scoring Function for Molecular Docking and Scoring Based on AutoDock and AutoDock Vina.
Tanchuk VY; Tanin VO; Vovk AI; Poda G
Chem Biol Drug Des; 2016 Apr; 87(4):618-25. PubMed ID: 26643167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of AutoDock and AutoDock Vina on the CASF-2013 Benchmark.
Gaillard T
J Chem Inf Model; 2018 Aug; 58(8):1697-1706. PubMed ID: 29989806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. DockingApp RF: A State-of-the-Art Novel Scoring Function for Molecular Docking in a User-Friendly Interface to AutoDock Vina.
Macari G; Toti D; Pasquadibisceglie A; Polticelli F
Int J Mol Sci; 2020 Dec; 21(24):. PubMed ID: 33333976
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Uni-Dock: GPU-Accelerated Docking Enables Ultralarge Virtual Screening.
Yu Y; Cai C; Wang J; Bo Z; Zhu Z; Zheng H
J Chem Theory Comput; 2023 Jun; 19(11):3336-3345. PubMed ID: 37125970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Chaos-embedded particle swarm optimization approach for protein-ligand docking and virtual screening.
Tai HK; Jusoh SA; Siu SWI
J Cheminform; 2018 Dec; 10(1):62. PubMed ID: 30552524
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Lessons learned in empirical scoring with smina from the CSAR 2011 benchmarking exercise.
Koes DR; Baumgartner MP; Camacho CJ
J Chem Inf Model; 2013 Aug; 53(8):1893-904. PubMed ID: 23379370
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Accelerating AutoDock Vina with GPUs.
Tang S; Chen R; Lin M; Lin Q; Zhu Y; Ding J; Hu H; Ling M; Wu J
Molecules; 2022 May; 27(9):. PubMed ID: 35566391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Rescoring of docking poses under Occam's Razor: are there simpler solutions?
Zhenin M; Bahia MS; Marcou G; Varnek A; Senderowitz H; Horvath D
J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2018 Sep; 32(9):877-888. PubMed ID: 30173397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A New Scoring Function for Molecular Docking Based on AutoDock and AutoDock Vina.
Tanchuk VY; Tanin VO; Vovk AI; Poda G
Curr Drug Discov Technol; 2015; 12(3):170-8. PubMed ID: 26302746
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. AutoDock Vina: improving the speed and accuracy of docking with a new scoring function, efficient optimization, and multithreading.
Trott O; Olson AJ
J Comput Chem; 2010 Jan; 31(2):455-61. PubMed ID: 19499576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The Performance of Several Docking Programs at Reproducing Protein-Macrolide-Like Crystal Structures.
Castro-Alvarez A; Costa AM; Vilarrasa J
Molecules; 2017 Jan; 22(1):. PubMed ID: 28106755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comprehensive evaluation of ten docking programs on a diverse set of protein-ligand complexes: the prediction accuracy of sampling power and scoring power.
Wang Z; Sun H; Yao X; Li D; Xu L; Li Y; Tian S; Hou T
Phys Chem Chem Phys; 2016 May; 18(18):12964-75. PubMed ID: 27108770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. PLHINT: A knowledge-driven computational approach based on the intermolecular H bond interactions at the protein-ligand interface from docking solutions.
Kumar SP
J Mol Graph Model; 2018 Jan; 79():194-212. PubMed ID: 29241118
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. AutoDock VinaXB: implementation of XBSF, new empirical halogen bond scoring function, into AutoDock Vina.
Koebel MR; Schmadeke G; Posner RG; Sirimulla S
J Cheminform; 2016; 8():27. PubMed ID: 27195023
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. AutoDock Vina 1.2.0: New Docking Methods, Expanded Force Field, and Python Bindings.
Eberhardt J; Santos-Martins D; Tillack AF; Forli S
J Chem Inf Model; 2021 Aug; 61(8):3891-3898. PubMed ID: 34278794
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparing neural-network scoring functions and the state of the art: applications to common library screening.
Durrant JD; Friedman AJ; Rogers KE; McCammon JA
J Chem Inf Model; 2013 Jul; 53(7):1726-35. PubMed ID: 23734946
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Identification of Potential Antituberculosis Drugs Through Docking and Virtual Screening.
Anand R
Interdiscip Sci; 2018 Jun; 10(2):419-429. PubMed ID: 27147082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
