These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

107 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27171185)

  • 1. Gradient sensing by a bistable regulatory motif enhances signal amplification but decreases accuracy in individual cells.
    Sharma R; Roberts E
    Phys Biol; 2016 May; 13(3):036003. PubMed ID: 27171185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Spontaneous polarization in eukaryotic gradient sensing: a mathematical model based on mutual inhibition of frontness and backness pathways.
    Narang A
    J Theor Biol; 2006 Jun; 240(4):538-53. PubMed ID: 16343548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Bidirectional molecular transport shapes cell polarization in a two-dimensional model of eukaryotic chemotaxis.
    Feng S; Zhu W
    J Theor Biol; 2014 Dec; 363():235-46. PubMed ID: 25167788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. An information-theoretic characterization of the optimal gradient sensing response of cells.
    Andrews BW; Iglesias PA
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2007 Aug; 3(8):e153. PubMed ID: 17676949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. How geometry and internal bias affect the accuracy of eukaryotic gradient sensing.
    Hu B; Chen W; Rappel WJ; Levine H
    Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys; 2011 Feb; 83(2 Pt 1):021917. PubMed ID: 21405873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Analysis of the signal transduction properties of a module of spatial sensing in eukaryotic chemotaxis.
    Krishnan J; Iglesias PA
    Bull Math Biol; 2003 Jan; 65(1):95-128. PubMed ID: 12597118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Bias in the gradient-sensing response of chemotactic cells.
    Skupsky R; McCann C; Nossal R; Losert W
    J Theor Biol; 2007 Jul; 247(2):242-58. PubMed ID: 17462672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Distinguishing modes of eukaryotic gradient sensing.
    Skupsky R; Losert W; Nossal RJ
    Biophys J; 2005 Oct; 89(4):2806-23. PubMed ID: 16085764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Noise filtering tradeoffs in spatial gradient sensing and cell polarization response.
    Chou CS; Bardwell L; Nie Q; Yi TM
    BMC Syst Biol; 2011 Dec; 5():196. PubMed ID: 22166067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Models of eukaryotic gradient sensing: application to chemotaxis of amoebae and neutrophils.
    Levchenko A; Iglesias PA
    Biophys J; 2002 Jan; 82(1 Pt 1):50-63. PubMed ID: 11751295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Rescaling of Spatio-Temporal Sensing in Eukaryotic Chemotaxis.
    Kamino K; Kondo Y
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(10):e0164674. PubMed ID: 27792738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Stochastic signal processing and transduction in chemotactic response of eukaryotic cells.
    Ueda M; Shibata T
    Biophys J; 2007 Jul; 93(1):11-20. PubMed ID: 17416630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Phenomenological approach to eukaryotic chemotactic efficiency.
    Hu B; Fuller D; Loomis WF; Levine H; Rappel WJ
    Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys; 2010 Mar; 81(3 Pt 1):031906. PubMed ID: 20365769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A mechanistic model for eukaryotic gradient sensing: spontaneous and induced phosphoinositide polarization.
    Subramanian KK; Narang A
    J Theor Biol; 2004 Nov; 231(1):49-67. PubMed ID: 15363929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A mechanism for the polarity formation of chemoreceptors at the growth cone membrane for gradient amplification during directional sensing.
    Bouzigues C; Holcman D; Dahan M
    PLoS One; 2010 Feb; 5(2):e9243. PubMed ID: 20179770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Role of spatial averaging in multicellular gradient sensing.
    Smith T; Fancher S; Levchenko A; Nemenman I; Mugler A
    Phys Biol; 2016 May; 13(3):035004. PubMed ID: 27203129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Autocatalytic loop, amplification and diffusion: a mathematical and computational model of cell polarization in neural chemotaxis.
    Causin P; Facchetti G
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2009 Aug; 5(8):e1000479. PubMed ID: 19714204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Stochastic signal inputs for chemotactic response in Dictyostelium cells revealed by single molecule imaging techniques.
    Miyanaga Y; Matsuoka S; Yanagida T; Ueda M
    Biosystems; 2007 Apr; 88(3):251-60. PubMed ID: 17184903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A local coupling model and compass parameter for eukaryotic chemotaxis.
    Arrieumerlou C; Meyer T
    Dev Cell; 2005 Feb; 8(2):215-27. PubMed ID: 15691763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Stochastic control of spontaneous signal generation for gradient sensing in chemotaxis.
    Naoki H; Sakumura Y; Ishii S
    J Theor Biol; 2008 Nov; 255(2):259-66. PubMed ID: 18789338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.