These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

170 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27172125)

  • 1. Estimating the Potential Toxicity of Chemicals Associated with Hydraulic Fracturing Operations Using Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationship Modeling.
    Yost EE; Stanek J; DeWoskin RS; Burgoon LD
    Environ Sci Technol; 2016 Jul; 50(14):7732-42. PubMed ID: 27172125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Overview of Chronic Oral Toxicity Values for Chemicals Present in Hydraulic Fracturing Fluids, Flowback, and Produced Waters.
    Yost EE; Stanek J; DeWoskin RS; Burgoon LD
    Environ Sci Technol; 2016 May; 50(9):4788-97. PubMed ID: 27050380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A decision analysis framework for estimating the potential hazards for drinking water resources of chemicals used in hydraulic fracturing fluids.
    Yost EE; Stanek J; Burgoon LD
    Sci Total Environ; 2017 Jan; 574():1544-1558. PubMed ID: 27666475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Assessment of the oral rat chronic lowest observed adverse effect level model in TOPKAT, a QSAR software package for toxicity prediction.
    Venkatapathy R; Moudgal CJ; Bruce RM
    J Chem Inf Comput Sci; 2004; 44(5):1623-9. PubMed ID: 15446819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Assessment of effect levels of chemicals from quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) models. I. Chronic lowest-observed-adverse-effect level (LOAEL).
    Mumtaz MM; Knauf LA; Reisman DJ; Peirano WB; DeRosa CT; Gombar VK; Enslein K; Carter JR; Blake BW; Huque KI
    Toxicol Lett; 1995 Sep; 79(1-3):131-43. PubMed ID: 7570650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Chronic oral LOAEL prediction by using a commercially available computational QSAR tool.
    Rupp B; Appel KE; Gundert-Remy U
    Arch Toxicol; 2010 Sep; 84(9):681-8. PubMed ID: 20224925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Application of QSTRs in the selection of a surrogate toxicity value for a chemical of concern.
    Moudgal CJ; Venkatapathy R; Choudhury H; Bruce RM; Lipscomb JC
    Environ Sci Technol; 2003 Nov; 37(22):5228-35. PubMed ID: 14655712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A systematic assessment of carcinogenicity of chemicals in hydraulic-fracturing fluids and flowback water.
    Xu X; Zhang X; Carrillo G; Zhong Y; Kan H; Zhang B
    Environ Pollut; 2019 Aug; 251():128-136. PubMed ID: 31075693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Development of quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) models to predict the carcinogenic potency of chemicals. II. Using oral slope factor as a measure of carcinogenic potency.
    Wang NC; Venkatapathy R; Bruce RM; Moudgal C
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2011 Mar; 59(2):215-26. PubMed ID: 20951756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A systematic evaluation of chemicals in hydraulic-fracturing fluids and wastewater for reproductive and developmental toxicity.
    Elliott EG; Ettinger AS; Leaderer BP; Bracken MB; Deziel NC
    J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol; 2017 Jan; 27(1):90-99. PubMed ID: 26732376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Modeling potential occupational inhalation exposures and associated risks of toxic organics from chemical storage tanks used in hydraulic fracturing using AERMOD.
    Chen H; Carter KE
    Environ Pollut; 2017 May; 224():300-309. PubMed ID: 28238366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Computational toxicology as implemented by the U.S. EPA: providing high throughput decision support tools for screening and assessing chemical exposure, hazard and risk.
    Kavlock R; Dix D
    J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev; 2010 Feb; 13(2-4):197-217. PubMed ID: 20574897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Quantitative prediction of repeat dose toxicity values using GenRA.
    Helman G; Patlewicz G; Shah I
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2019 Dec; 109():104480. PubMed ID: 31550520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Development of quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) models to predict the carcinogenic potency of chemicals I. Alternative toxicity measures as an estimator of carcinogenic potency.
    Venkatapathy R; Wang CY; Bruce RM; Moudgal C
    Toxicol Appl Pharmacol; 2009 Jan; 234(2):209-21. PubMed ID: 18977375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Assessment of the Acute and Chronic Health Hazards of Hydraulic Fracturing Fluids.
    Wattenberg EV; Bielicki JM; Suchomel AE; Sweet JT; Vold EM; Ramachandran G
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2015; 12(9):611-24. PubMed ID: 25894916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Practical considerations on the use of predictive models for regulatory purposes.
    Tunkel J; Mayo K; Austin C; Hickerson A; Howard P
    Environ Sci Technol; 2005 Apr; 39(7):2188-99. PubMed ID: 15871254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Chemical risk assessment and uncertainty associated with extrapolation across exposure duration.
    Pohl HR; Chou CH; Ruiz P; Holler JS
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2010 Jun; 57(1):18-23. PubMed ID: 19944126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Approaches for describing and communicating overall uncertainty in toxicity characterizations: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's Integrated Risk Information System (IRIS) as a case study.
    Beck NB; Becker RA; Erraguntla N; Farland WH; Grant RL; Gray G; Kirman C; LaKind JS; Jeffrey Lewis R; Nance P; Pottenger LH; Santos SL; Shirley S; Simon T; Dourson ML
    Environ Int; 2016; 89-90():110-28. PubMed ID: 26827183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. QSARs for identifying and prioritizing substances with persistence and bioconcentration potential.
    Walker JD; Carlsen L
    SAR QSAR Environ Res; 2002 Dec; 13(7-8):713-25. PubMed ID: 12570048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. In vitro dermal absorption rate testing of certain chemicals of interest to the Occupational Safety and Health Administration: summary and evaluation of USEPA's mandated testing.
    Fasano WJ; McDougal JN
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2008 Jul; 51(2):181-94. PubMed ID: 18501488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.