133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27172741)
21. [Outcomes and prognostic factors of distant metastasis in patients with advanced cervical squamous cell carcinoma treated with concurrent chemoradiotherapy].
Ma R; Zhang H; Zou L; Qu Y
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2015 Feb; 50(2):125-30. PubMed ID: 25877610
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Comparison of the prognoses of FIGO stage I to stage II adenosquamous carcinoma and adenocarcinoma of the uterine cervix treated with radical hysterectomy.
Mabuchi S; Okazawa M; Kinose Y; Matsuo K; Fujiwara M; Suzuki O; Morii E; Kamiura S; Ogawa K; Kimura T
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2012 Oct; 22(8):1389-97. PubMed ID: 22976497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Impact of histological subtype on survival in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer that were treated with definitive radiotherapy: adenocarcinoma/adenosquamous carcinoma versus squamous cell carcinoma.
Yokoi E; Mabuchi S; Takahashi R; Matsumoto Y; Kuroda H; Kozasa K; Kimura T
J Gynecol Oncol; 2017 Mar; 28(2):e19. PubMed ID: 28028992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Intratumoral lymphatic vessel density and clinicopathologic features of patients with early-stage cervical cancer after radical hysterectomy.
Zaganelli FL; Carvalho FM; Almeida BG; Bacchi CE; Goes JC; Calil MA; Baracat EC; Carvalho JP
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2010 Oct; 20(7):1225-31. PubMed ID: 21135594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Outcome of international Federation of gynecology and obstetrics stage IIb cervical cancer from 2003 to 2012: an evaluation of treatments and prognosis: a retrospective study.
Guo L; Liu X; Wang L; Sun H; Huang K; Li X; Tang F; Li S; Yuan X; Wang C
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2015 Jun; 25(5):910-8. PubMed ID: 25867278
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Significance of the absolute number and ratio of metastatic lymph nodes in predicting postoperative survival for the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage IA2 to IIA cervical cancer.
Chen Y; Zhang L; Tian J; Fu X; Ren X; Hao Q
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2013 Jan; 23(1):157-63. PubMed ID: 23221732
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Comparison of clinical outcomes of squamous cell carcinoma, adenocarcinoma, and adenosquamous carcinoma of the uterine cervix after definitive radiotherapy: a population-based analysis.
Zhou J; Wu SG; Sun JY; Li FY; Lin HX; Chen QH; He ZY
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol; 2017 Jan; 143(1):115-122. PubMed ID: 27646608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. The Utility of Pretreatment and Posttreatment Lymphopenia in Cervical Squamous Cell Carcinoma Patients Treated With Definitive Chemoradiotherapy.
Onal C; Yildirim BA; Guler OC; Mertsoylu H
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2018 Oct; 28(8):1553-1559. PubMed ID: 30247248
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Adenosquamous histology predicts a poor outcome for patients with advanced-stage, but not early-stage, cervical carcinoma.
Farley JH; Hickey KW; Carlson JW; Rose GS; Kost ER; Harrison TA
Cancer; 2003 May; 97(9):2196-202. PubMed ID: 12712471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. [Long-term oncological outcomes after laparoscopic versus abdominal radical hysterectomy in stage I a2- II a2 cervical cancer: a matched cohort study].
Wang W; Shang C; Huang J; Chen S; Shen H; Yao S
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2015 Dec; 50(12):894-901. PubMed ID: 26887872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. The long-term efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by radical hysterectomy compared with radical surgery alone or concurrent chemoradiotherapy on locally advanced-stage cervical cancer.
Yin M; Zhao F; Lou G; Zhang H; Sun M; Li C; Hou Y; Li X; Meng F; Chen X
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2011 Jan; 21(1):92-9. PubMed ID: 21330834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. A comparison of the prognosis between adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma in stage IB-IIA cervical cancer.
Xie X; Song K; Cui B; Jiang J; Yang X; Kong B
Int J Clin Oncol; 2018 Jun; 23(3):522-531. PubMed ID: 29299705
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Pretreatment Mean Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Is Significantly Correlated With Event-Free Survival in Patients With International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics Stage Ib to IIIb Cervical Cancer.
Himoto Y; Fujimoto K; Kido A; Baba T; Tanaka S; Morisawa N; Koyasu S; Konishi I; Togashi K
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2015 Jul; 25(6):1079-85. PubMed ID: 25853385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Early stage cervical cancer with negative pelvic lymph nodes: pattern of failure and complication following radical hysterectomy and adjuvant radiotherapy.
Chen SW; Liang JA; Yang SN; Lin FJ
Eur J Gynaecol Oncol; 2004; 25(1):81-6. PubMed ID: 15053068
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Comparison of treatment outcomes between squamous cell carcinoma and adenocarcinoma of cervix after definitive radiotherapy or concurrent chemoradiotherapy.
Hu K; Wang W; Liu X; Meng Q; Zhang F
Radiat Oncol; 2018 Dec; 13(1):249. PubMed ID: 30558636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Multimodal treatment including hysterectomy improves survival in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer: A population-based, propensity score-matched analysis.
Wu SG; Zhang WW; Sun JY; Li FY; He ZY; Zhou J
Int J Surg; 2017 Dec; 48():122-127. PubMed ID: 29032160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. [Results of different postoperative adjuvant therapies for stage Ib-IIa cervical carcinoma with risk factors].
Wen HW; Huang WP; Liu TY; Ma K; Tao X; Zhu LR; Liao QP
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2013 Dec; 48(12):920-4. PubMed ID: 24495686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Comparison of clinical outcomes of adenocarcinoma and adenosquamous carcinoma in uterine cervical cancer patients receiving surgical resection followed by radiotherapy: a multicenter retrospective study (KROG 13-10).
Noh JM; Park W; Kim YS; Kim JY; Kim HJ; Kim J; Kim JH; Yoon MS; Choi JH; Yoon WS; Kim JY; Huh SJ
Gynecol Oncol; 2014 Mar; 132(3):618-23. PubMed ID: 24486605
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Neo-adjuvant treatment of adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma of the cervix results in significantly different pathological complete response rates.
Couvreur K; Naert E; De Jaeghere E; Tummers P; Makar A; De Visschere P; Van Bockstal M; Van Dorpe J; De Neve W; Denys H; Vandecasteele K
BMC Cancer; 2018 Nov; 18(1):1101. PubMed ID: 30419851
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Is the revised 2018 FIGO staging system for cervical cancer more prognostic than the 2009 FIGO staging system for women previously staged as IB disease?
Ayhan A; Aslan K; Bulut AN; Akilli H; Öz M; Haberal A; Meydanli MM
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2019 Sep; 240():209-214. PubMed ID: 31325847
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
