These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
334 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27172855)
21. The Dynamic Multiprocess Framework: evidence from prospective memory with contextual variability. Scullin MK; McDaniel MA; Shelton JT Cogn Psychol; 2013; 67(1-2):55-71. PubMed ID: 23916951 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Prospective memory and aging: evidence for preserved spontaneous retrieval with exact but not related cues. Mullet HG; Scullin MK; Hess TJ; Scullin RB; Arnold KM; Einstein GO Psychol Aging; 2013 Dec; 28(4):910-22. PubMed ID: 24364398 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Acute stress shifts the balance between controlled and automatic processes in prospective memory. Möschl M; Walser M; Plessow F; Goschke T; Fischer R Neurobiol Learn Mem; 2017 Oct; 144():53-67. PubMed ID: 28625494 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Metamemory and prospective memory in Parkinson's disease. Smith SJ; Souchay C; Moulin CJ Neuropsychology; 2011 Nov; 25(6):734-40. PubMed ID: 21928905 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Individual differences in the delayed execution of prospective memories. Ball BH; Knight JB; Dewitt MR; Brewer GA Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2013; 66(12):2411-25. PubMed ID: 23679085 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Effect of type of cue, type of response, time delay and two different ongoing tasks on prospective memory functioning after acquired brain injury. Raskin SA; Buckheit CA; Waxman A Neuropsychol Rehabil; 2012; 22(1):40-64. PubMed ID: 22181940 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Retrieval in prospective memory: Multiple processes or just delay? Anderson FT; McDaniel MA Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2019 Sep; 72(9):2197-2207. PubMed ID: 30957661 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Retrieval cue and delay interval influence the relationship between prospective memory and activities of daily living in older adults. Tierney SM; Bucks RS; Weinborn M; Hodgson E; Woods SP J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 2016; 38(5):572-84. PubMed ID: 26905098 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Let it go: the flexible engagement and disengagement of monitoring processes in a non-focal prospective memory task. Cohen AL; Gordon A; Jaudas A; Hefer C; Dreisbach G Psychol Res; 2017 Mar; 81(2):366-377. PubMed ID: 26820461 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Delayed-execute prospective memory performance: the effects of age and working memory. Kliegel M; Jäger T Dev Neuropsychol; 2006; 30(3):819-43. PubMed ID: 17083295 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. The best of both worlds: emotional cues improve prospective memory execution and reduce repetition errors. May CP; Manning M; Einstein GO; Becker L; Owens M Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn; 2015; 22(3):357-75. PubMed ID: 25175608 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. The effect of semantic context on prospective memory performance. Thomas BJ; McBride DM Memory; 2016; 24(3):315-23. PubMed ID: 25647351 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. The general facilitation effect of implementation intentions on prospective memory performance in patients with schizophrenia. Liu LL; Gan MY; Cui JF; Chen T; Tan SP; Neumann DL; Shum DHK; Wang Y; Chan RCK Cogn Neuropsychiatry; 2018 Nov; 23(6):350-363. PubMed ID: 30269636 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Development of a paradigm for studying the effects of brief Goal Management Training with Implementation Intentions. Baylan S; Evans J Neuropsychol Rehabil; 2019 Jan; 29(1):56-72. PubMed ID: 28006989 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Controlling intentions: the surprising ease of stopping after going relative to stopping after never having gone. Bugg JM; Scullin MK Psychol Sci; 2013 Dec; 24(12):2463-71. PubMed ID: 24091550 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]