These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

162 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 271731)

  • 1. Procedural problems in using the Denar pantograph as a transfer-bow.
    Beck DB; Kass CA; Knap FJ
    J Prosthet Dent; 1978 Feb; 39(2):166-8. PubMed ID: 271731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effect of different centric relation registrations on the pantographic representation of centric relation.
    Sindledecker L
    J Prosthet Dent; 1981 Sep; 46(3):271-9. PubMed ID: 6943337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A new articulator emphasizing centric occlusion and the anterior determinants.
    Gibbs CH; Derda HJ
    J Prosthet Dent; 1977 Apr; 37(4):382-93. PubMed ID: 265396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Technique for transferring information from a pantograph tracing to semiadjustable articulators.
    Gordon SR; Stoffer WM
    J Prosthet Dent; 1985 Oct; 54(4):503-7. PubMed ID: 3862808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Can the centric wax bite record be dispensed with? A method for the pantographic determination of the centric relation for the cast mounting].
    Weber R; Stachniss V
    Dtsch Zahnarztl Z; 1982 Nov; 37(11):900-3. PubMed ID: 6959802
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A graphic comparison of mandibular border movements generated by various articulators. Part I: Methodology.
    Stern N; Hatano Y; Kolling JN; Clayton JA
    J Prosthet Dent; 1988 Aug; 60(2):194-8. PubMed ID: 3172004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of mandibular movements recorded by two pantographs.
    Donaldson K; Clayton JA
    J Prosthet Dent; 1986 Jan; 55(1):52-8. PubMed ID: 3456048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Use of a mounting table for arbitrary hinge transfer on an articulator].
    Lavigne J; Lucchini JP; Spirgi M
    SSO Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnheilkd; 1979 Dec; 89(12):1251-6. PubMed ID: 296825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Reproduction ofarticulator settings and movements with an ultrasonic jaw movement recorder.
    Baker PJ; Setchell DJ; Tredwin CJ
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2006 Jun; 14(2):55-62. PubMed ID: 16808105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Observations on the use of the Denar pantograph and articulator.
    Winstanley RB
    J Prosthet Dent; 1977 Dec; 38(6):660-72. PubMed ID: 271716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Complete dentures using a completely adjustable articulator: Denar].
    Pastant A
    Cah Prothese; 1983 Jun; 11(42):45-68. PubMed ID: 6380659
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A comparison of articulator settings obtained using a computerized pantograph with settings obtained using a lateral check bite recording.
    Price RB; Gerrow JD; Ramier WC
    Quintessence Int; 1988 Jun; 19(6):423-30. PubMed ID: 3269591
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Split cast discrepancies and arbitrary axis dental cast articulator mounting.
    Laing DP; Wise MD
    J Oral Rehabil; 1978 Jul; 5(3):249-59. PubMed ID: 279651
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Cast mounting on the articulator and its relationship to protrusive records].
    Marquezini AD; De Arruda JL; De Sousa V
    Rev Fac Odontol Aracatuba; 1976; 5(1-2):203-10. PubMed ID: 1077586
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. An in vitro evaluation of the reliability and validity of an electronic pantograph by testing with five different articulators.
    Chang WS; Romberg E; Driscoll CF; Tabacco MJ
    J Prosthet Dent; 2004 Jul; 92(1):83-9. PubMed ID: 15232566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A graphic comparison of mandibular border movements generated by various articulators. Part II: Results.
    Hatano Y; Kolling JN; Stern N; Clayton JA
    J Prosthet Dent; 1989 Apr; 61(4):425-9. PubMed ID: 2724155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Mounting of functiographs in the articulator].
    Kleinrok M
    Dent Labor (Munch); 1983 Oct; 31(10):1233-6. PubMed ID: 6583100
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Accuracy of two face-bow/semi-adjustable articulator systems in transferring the maxillary occlusal cant.
    Nazir N; Sujesh M; Kumar R; Sreenivas P
    Indian J Dent Res; 2012; 23(4):437-42. PubMed ID: 23257473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A comparison of articulator settings obtained by using an electronic pantograph and lateral interocclusal recordings.
    Price RB; Bannerman RA
    J Prosthet Dent; 1988 Aug; 60(2):159-64. PubMed ID: 3172002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Accuracy of face-bow transfer: effect on surgical prediction and postsurgical result.
    Ellis E; Tharanon W; Gambrell K
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 1992 Jun; 50(6):562-7. PubMed ID: 1593315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.