These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2717380)

  • 1. Comparison of CAD-CAM and hand made sockets for PTB prostheses.
    Köhler P; Lindh L; Netz P
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 1989 Apr; 13(1):19-24. PubMed ID: 2717380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Clinical evaluation of trans-tibial prosthesis sockets: a comparison between CAD CAM and conventionally produced sockets.
    Oberg T; Lilja M; Johansson T; Karsznia A
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 1993 Dec; 17(3):164-71. PubMed ID: 8134276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) in prosthetics.
    Topper AK; Fernie GR
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1990 Jul; (256):39-43. PubMed ID: 2364620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Validation of a quantitative method for defining CAD/CAM socket modifications.
    Lemaire ED; Bexiga P; Johnson F; Solomonidis SE; Paul JP
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 1999 Apr; 23(1):30-44. PubMed ID: 10355641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Gait, cost and time implications for changing from PTB to ICEX sockets.
    Datta D; Harris I; Heller B; Howitt J; Martin R
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 2004 Aug; 28(2):115-20. PubMed ID: 15382805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Automated fabrication of mobility aids (AFMA): below-knee CASD/CAM testing and evaluation program results.
    Houston VL; Burgess EM; Childress DS; Lehneis HR; Mason CP; Garbarini MA; LaBlanc KP; Boone DA; Chan RB; Harlan JH
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 1992; 29(4):78-124. PubMed ID: 1432729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. An evaluation of computer aided design of below-knee prosthetic sockets.
    Topper AK; Fernie GR
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 1990 Dec; 14(3):136-42. PubMed ID: 2128892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. CAD CAM trans-tibial temporary prosthesis: analysis and comparison with an established technique.
    Ruder GK
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 1992 Dec; 16(3):189-95. PubMed ID: 1491953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A CAD CAM method for custom below-knee sockets.
    Engsberg JR; Clynch GS; Lee AG; Allan JS; Harder JA
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 1992 Dec; 16(3):183-8. PubMed ID: 1491952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A review of history of CAD/CAM system application in the production of transtibial prosthetic socket in developing countries (from 1980 to 2019).
    Afiqah Hamzah N; Razak NAA; Sayuti Ab Karim M; Gholizadeh H
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2021 Dec; 235(12):1359-1374. PubMed ID: 34304625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Sockets Manufactured by CAD/CAM Method Have Positive Effects on the Quality of Life of Patients With Transtibial Amputation.
    Karakoç M; Batmaz İ; Sariyildiz MA; Yazmalar L; Aydin A; Em S
    Am J Phys Med Rehabil; 2017 Aug; 96(8):578-581. PubMed ID: 28085736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Computer-Aided Design and Computer-Aided Manufacture (CAD-CAM) applications in cosmetic below-elbow prostheses.
    Bok SH; Bhattacharjee A; Nee AY; Pho RW; Teoh SH; Lim SY
    Ann Acad Med Singap; 1990 Sep; 19(5):699-705. PubMed ID: 2260827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. CAD/CAM evaluation of the fit of trans-tibial sockets for trans-tibial amputation stumps.
    Isozaki K; Hosoda M; Masuda T; Morita S
    J Med Dent Sci; 2006 Mar; 53(1):51-6. PubMed ID: 16722145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Interface pressures in above-knee sockets.
    Krouskop TA; Brown J; Goode B; Winningham D
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 1987 Oct; 68(10):713-4. PubMed ID: 3662780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The AirCirc: design and development of a thermal management prototype device for below-knee prosthesis leg socket.
    Nurhanisah MH; Jawaid M; Ahmad Azmeer R; Paridah MT
    Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2019 Jul; 14(5):513-520. PubMed ID: 29933703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Dynamic interface pressure distributions of two transtibial prosthetic socket concepts.
    Dumbleton T; Buis AW; McFadyen A; McHugh BF; McKay G; Murray KD; Sexton S
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 2009; 46(3):405-15. PubMed ID: 19675992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Computer automated design and computer automated manufacture.
    Brncick M
    Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am; 2000 Aug; 11(3):701-13. PubMed ID: 10989487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Computer-aided socket design for trans-femoral amputees.
    Travis RP; Dewar ME
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 1993 Dec; 17(3):172-9. PubMed ID: 8134277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Computer aided design of prosthetic sockets for below-knee amputees.
    Saunders CG; Foort J; Bannon M; Lean D; Panych L
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 1985 Apr; 9(1):17-22. PubMed ID: 4000906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of the effects of patellar tendon bearing and total surface bearing sockets on prosthetic fitting and rehabilitation.
    Yiğiter K; Sener G; Bayar K
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 2002 Dec; 26(3):206-12. PubMed ID: 12562067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.