383 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27173889)
1. Pigs that are divergent in feed efficiency, differ in intestinal enzyme and nutrient transporter gene expression, nutrient digestibility and microbial activity.
Vigors S; Sweeney T; O'Shea CJ; Kelly AK; O'Doherty JV
Animal; 2016 Nov; 10(11):1848-1855. PubMed ID: 27173889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Improved nutrient digestibility and retention partially explains feed efficiency gains in pigs selected for low residual feed intake.
Harris AJ; Patience JF; Lonergan SM; J M Dekkers C; Gabler NK
J Anim Sci; 2012 Dec; 90 Suppl 4():164-6. PubMed ID: 23365317
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The Effect of Divergence in Feed Efficiency on the Intestinal Microbiota and the Intestinal Immune Response in Both Unchallenged and Lipopolysaccharide Challenged Ileal and Colonic Explants.
Vigors S; O'Doherty JV; Kelly AK; O'Shea CJ; Sweeney T
PLoS One; 2016; 11(2):e0148145. PubMed ID: 26840831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Improvements in growth performance, bone mineral status and nutrient digestibility in pigs following the dietary inclusion of phytase are accompanied by modifications in intestinal nutrient transporter gene expression.
Vigors S; Sweeney T; O'Shea CJ; Browne JA; O'Doherty JV
Br J Nutr; 2014 Sep; 112(5):688-97. PubMed ID: 24998244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effects of divergent selection for residual feed intake on nitrogen metabolism and lysine utilization in growing pigs.
Hewitt DJ; Dekkers JCM; Antonick T; Gheisari A; Rakhshandeh AR; Rakhshandeh A
J Anim Sci; 2020 May; 98(5):. PubMed ID: 32367123
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Interactions between metabolically active bacteria and host gene expression at the cecal mucosa in pigs of diverging feed efficiency.
Metzler-Zebeli BU; Lawlor PG; Magowan E; Zebeli Q
J Anim Sci; 2018 Jun; 96(6):2249-2264. PubMed ID: 29746643
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effect of immune system stimulation and divergent selection for residual feed intake on digestive capacity of the small intestine in growing pigs.
Rakhshandeh A; Dekkers JC; Kerr BJ; Weber TE; English J; Gabler NK
J Anim Sci; 2012 Dec; 90 Suppl 4():233-5. PubMed ID: 23365340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Relationship between residual feed intake and digestibility for lactating Holstein cows fed high and low starch diets.
Potts SB; Boerman JP; Lock AL; Allen MS; VandeHaar MJ
J Dairy Sci; 2017 Jan; 100(1):265-278. PubMed ID: 28341046
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Animals selected for postweaning weight gain rate have similar maintenance energy requirements regardless of their residual feed intake classification.
Batalha CDA; Tedeschi LO; de Araújo FL; Branco RH; Cyrillo JNDSG; Bonilha SFM
J Anim Sci; 2021 Mar; 99(3):. PubMed ID: 33674822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Impact of hygiene of housing conditions on performance and health of two pig genetic lines divergent for residual feed intake.
Chatelet A; Gondret F; Merlot E; Gilbert H; Friggens NC; Le Floc'h N
Animal; 2018 Feb; 12(2):350-358. PubMed ID: 28651668
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Growth performance, gastrointestinal microbial activity, and nutrient digestibility in early-weaned pigs fed diets containing flaxseed and carbohydrase enzyme.
Kiarie E; Nyachoti CM; Slominski BA; Blank G
J Anim Sci; 2007 Nov; 85(11):2982-93. PubMed ID: 17686904
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Variation in faecal digestibility values related to feed efficiency traits of grower-finisher pigs.
Verschuren LMG; Schokker D; Bergsma R; van Milgen J; Molist F; Calus MPL; Jansman AJM
Animal; 2021 Sep; 15(9):100211. PubMed ID: 34416554
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Residual feed intake studies in Angus-sired cattle reveal a potential role for hypothalamic gene expression in regulating feed efficiency.
Perkins SD; Key CN; Garrett CF; Foradori CD; Bratcher CL; Kriese-Anderson LA; Brandebourg TD
J Anim Sci; 2014 Feb; 92(2):549-60. PubMed ID: 24398827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Intestinal integrity, endotoxin transport and detoxification in pigs divergently selected for residual feed intake.
Mani V; Harris AJ; Keating AF; Weber TE; Dekkers JC; Gabler NK
J Anim Sci; 2013 May; 91(5):2141-50. PubMed ID: 23463550
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effect of supplementing a fibrous diet with a xylanase and β-glucanase blend on growth performance, intestinal glucose uptake, and transport-associated gene expression in growing pigs.
Agyekum AK; Sands JS; Regassa A; Kiarie E; Weihrauch D; Kim WK; Nyachoti CM
J Anim Sci; 2015 Jul; 93(7):3483-93. PubMed ID: 26440017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Characterization of microbial populations and volatile fatty acid concentrations in the jejunum, ileum, and cecum of pigs weaned at 17 vs 24 days of age.
Franklin MA; Mathew AG; Vickers JR; Clift RA
J Anim Sci; 2002 Nov; 80(11):2904-10. PubMed ID: 12462258
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Colonic microbiome profiles for improved feed efficiency can be identified despite major effects of farm of origin and contemporary group in pigs.
Vigors S; O' Doherty JV; Sweeney T
Animal; 2020 Dec; 14(12):2472-2480. PubMed ID: 32605690
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Exploring a Possible Link between the Intestinal Microbiota and Feed Efficiency in Pigs.
McCormack UM; Curião T; Buzoianu SG; Prieto ML; Ryan T; Varley P; Crispie F; Magowan E; Metzler-Zebeli BU; Berry D; O'Sullivan O; Cotter PD; Gardiner GE; Lawlor PG
Appl Environ Microbiol; 2017 Aug; 83(15):. PubMed ID: 28526795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effect of residual feed intake on hypothalamic gene expression and meat quality in Angus-sired cattle grown during the hot season.
Perkins SD; Key CN; Marvin MN; Garrett CF; Foradori CD; Bratcher CL; Kriese-Anderson LA; Brandebourg TD
J Anim Sci; 2014 Apr; 92(4):1451-61. PubMed ID: 24663166
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effect of diet energy density and genomic residual feed intake on prebred dairy heifer feed efficiency, growth, and manure excretion.
Williams KT; Weigel KA; Coblentz WK; Esser NM; Schlesser H; Hoffman PC; Su H; Akins MS
J Dairy Sci; 2019 May; 102(5):4041-4050. PubMed ID: 30852010
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
