358 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27174495)
21. Alloplastic Cranioplasty Reconstruction: A Systematic Review Comparing Outcomes With Titanium Mesh, Polymethyl Methacrylate, Polyether Ether Ketone, and Norian Implants in 3591 Adult Patients.
Oliver JD; Banuelos J; Abu-Ghname A; Vyas KS; Sharaf B
Ann Plast Surg; 2019 May; 82(5S Suppl 4):S289-S294. PubMed ID: 30973834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Translucent Customized Cranial Implants Made of Clear Polymethylmethacrylate: An Early Outcome Analysis of 55 Consecutive Cranioplasty Cases.
Shay T; Mitchell KA; Belzberg M; Zelko I; Mahapatra S; Qian J; Mendoza L; Huang J; Brem H; Gordon C
Ann Plast Surg; 2020 Dec; 85(6):e27-e36. PubMed ID: 33170582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Long-term Outcomes of Cranioplasty: Titanium Mesh Is Not a Long-term Solution in High-risk Patients.
Kwiecien GJ; Rueda S; Couto RA; Hashem A; Nagel S; Schwarz GS; Zins JE; Gastman BR
Ann Plast Surg; 2018 Oct; 81(4):416-422. PubMed ID: 30059381
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Outcome in patient-specific PEEK cranioplasty: A two-center cohort study of 40 implants.
Jonkergouw J; van de Vijfeijken SE; Nout E; Theys T; Van de Casteele E; Folkersma H; Depauw PR; Becking AG
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2016 Sep; 44(9):1266-72. PubMed ID: 27524384
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Management of decompressive craniectomy defects: modern military treatment strategies.
Tantawi D; Armonda R; Valerio I; Kumar AR
J Craniofac Surg; 2012 Nov; 23(7 Suppl 1):2042-5. PubMed ID: 23154344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Cranioplasties following craniectomies in children-a multicenter, retrospective cohort study.
Klieverik VM; Miller KJ; Han KS; Singhal A; Vassilyadi M; Touchette CJ; Weil AG; Woerdeman PA
Childs Nerv Syst; 2019 Sep; 35(9):1473-1480. PubMed ID: 30554262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Comparison of polyetheretherketone and titanium cranioplasty after decompressive craniectomy.
Thien A; King NK; Ang BT; Wang E; Ng I
World Neurosurg; 2015 Feb; 83(2):176-80. PubMed ID: 24909393
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Autogenous Bone Cranioplasty: Review of a 42-Year Experience by a Single Surgeon.
Cabbad NC; Stalder MW; Arroyave A; Wolfe EM; Wolfe SA
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2019 Jun; 143(6):1713-1723. PubMed ID: 31136489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Hydroxyapatite ceramic implants for cranioplasty in children: a retrospective evaluation of clinical outcome and osteointegration.
Spennato P; Canella V; Aliberti F; Russo C; Ruggiero C; Nataloni A; Lombardo M; Cinalli G
Childs Nerv Syst; 2020 Mar; 36(3):551-558. PubMed ID: 31786632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Cranioplasty of Hemispherical Defects Using High Impact Methylmethacrylic Plate.
Kumar NG; Rangarajan H; Shourie P
J Craniofac Surg; 2015 Sep; 26(6):1882-6. PubMed ID: 26355975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Outcomes of Cranioplasty with Preformed Titanium versus Freehand Molded Polymethylmethacrylate Implants.
Höhne J; Werzmirzowsky K; Ott C; Hohenberger C; Hassanin BG; Brawanski A; Schebesch KM
J Neurol Surg A Cent Eur Neurosurg; 2018 May; 79(3):200-205. PubMed ID: 28800664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Analysis of PMMA versus CaP titanium-enhanced implants for cranioplasty after decompressive craniectomy: a retrospective observational cohort study.
Wesp D; Krenzlin H; Jankovic D; Ottenhausen M; Jägersberg M; Ringel F; Keric N
Neurosurg Rev; 2022 Dec; 45(6):3647-3655. PubMed ID: 36222944
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Skull Reconstruction Using a Custom-Made, Three-Dimensional-Printed, Hydroxyapatite-Titanium Cranioplasty Implant: Largest Single-Center U.S. Experience.
Sorek S; Miller A; Griepp D; Moawad S; Zanzerkia R; Rahme R
World Neurosurg; 2022 Nov; 167():e1387-e1394. PubMed ID: 36115561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Cranioplasty Using Customized 3-Dimensional-Printed Titanium Implants: An International Collaboration Effort to Improve Neurosurgical Care.
Nguyen B; Ashraf O; Richards R; Tra H; Huynh T
World Neurosurg; 2021 May; 149():174-180. PubMed ID: 33647494
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Modified fixation of acrylic cranioplasty in the setting of titanium allergy.
Sinkin JC; Loftin S; Baker SB
J Craniofac Surg; 2015 Jan; 26(1):e24-6. PubMed ID: 25565231
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Skull Bone Defects Reconstruction with Custom-Made Titanium Graft shaped with Electron Beam Melting Technology: Preliminary Experience in a Series of Ten Patients.
Francaviglia N; Maugeri R; Odierna Contino A; Meli F; Fiorenza V; Costantino G; Giammalva RG; Iacopino DG
Acta Neurochir Suppl; 2017; 124():137-141. PubMed ID: 28120065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Comparison between autologous bone grafts and acrylic (PMMA) implants - A retrospective analysis of 286 cranioplasty procedures.
Vince GH; Kraschl J; Rauter H; Stein M; Grossauer S; Uhl E
J Clin Neurosci; 2019 Mar; 61():205-209. PubMed ID: 30396817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Cranioplasty: Review of Materials.
Zanotti B; Zingaretti N; Verlicchi A; Robiony M; Alfieri A; Parodi PC
J Craniofac Surg; 2016 Nov; 27(8):2061-2072. PubMed ID: 28005754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Clinical outcome of cranioplasty with high-density porous polyethylene.
Wang JC; Wei L; Xu J; Liu JF; Gui L
J Craniofac Surg; 2012 Sep; 23(5):1404-6. PubMed ID: 22948631
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Immediate Single-Stage Cranioplasty Following Calvarial Resection for Benign and Malignant Skull Neoplasms Using Customized Craniofacial Implants.
Berli JU; Thomaier L; Zhong S; Huang J; Quinones A; Lim M; Weingart J; Brem H; Gordon CR
J Craniofac Surg; 2015 Jul; 26(5):1456-62. PubMed ID: 26163837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
