319 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27174519)
1. Interfering with free recall of words: Detrimental effects of phonological competition.
Fernandes MA; Wammes JD; Priselac S; Moscovitch M
Neuropsychologia; 2016 Sep; 90():59-71. PubMed ID: 27174519
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Factors modulating the effect of divided attention during retrieval of words.
Fernandes MA; Moscovitch M
Mem Cognit; 2002 Jul; 30(5):731-44. PubMed ID: 12219890
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Contribution of frontal and temporal lobe function to memory interference from divided attention at retrieval.
Fernandes MA; Davidson PS; Glisky EL; Moscovitch M
Neuropsychology; 2004 Jul; 18(3):514-25. PubMed ID: 15291729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The effect of concurrent semantic categorization on delayed serial recall.
Acheson DJ; MacDonald MC; Postle BR
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2011 Jan; 37(1):44-59. PubMed ID: 21058880
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Paced reading in semantic dementia: word knowledge contributes to phoneme binding in rapid speech production.
Jefferies E; Grogan J; Mapelli C; Isella V
Neuropsychologia; 2012 Apr; 50(5):723-32. PubMed ID: 22245722
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Newly-acquired words are more phonologically robust in verbal short-term memory when they have associated semantic representations.
Savill N; Ellis AW; Jefferies E
Neuropsychologia; 2017 Apr; 98():85-97. PubMed ID: 26965397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The residual protective effects of enactment.
Wammes JD; Fernandes MA
Cognition; 2017 Jul; 164():87-101. PubMed ID: 28391135
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Relating distinctive orthographic and phonological processes to episodic memory performance.
Cortese MJ; Watson JM; Wang J; Fugett A
Mem Cognit; 2004 Jun; 32(4):632-9. PubMed ID: 15478757
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Semantic and phonological influences on visual word learning in a transparent language.
Suárez-Coalla P; Cuetos F
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2017 Apr; 70(4):772-781. PubMed ID: 27022670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Divided attention and memory: evidence of substantial interference effects at retrieval and encoding.
Fernandes MA; Moscovitch M
J Exp Psychol Gen; 2000 Jun; 129(2):155-76. PubMed ID: 10868332
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Phonological similarity effect in complex span task.
Camos V; Mora G; Barrouillet P
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2013; 66(10):1927-50. PubMed ID: 23419012
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Assembling and encoding word representations: fMRI subsequent memory effects implicate a role for phonological control.
Clark D; Wagner AD
Neuropsychologia; 2003; 41(3):304-17. PubMed ID: 12457756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Examining the relationship between immediate serial recall and immediate free recall: common effects of phonological loop variables but only limited evidence for the phonological loop.
Spurgeon J; Ward G; Matthews WJ
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2014 Jul; 40(4):1110-41. PubMed ID: 24564540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Dissociative contributions of semantic and lexical-phonological information to immediate recognition.
Nishiyama R
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2013 Mar; 39(2):642-8. PubMed ID: 22774851
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The Hebb repetition effect as a laboratory analogue of novel word learning.
Szmalec A; Duyck W; Vandierendonck A; Mata AB; Page MP
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2009 Mar; 62(3):435-43. PubMed ID: 18785073
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Individual differences in working memory capacity determine the effects of oculomotor task load on concurrent word recall performance.
Lee EJ; Kwon G; Lee A; Ghajar J; Suh M
Brain Res; 2011 Jul; 1399():59-65. PubMed ID: 21645879
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Recall of short word lists presented visually at fast rates: effects of phonological similarity and word length.
Coltheart V; Langdon R
Mem Cognit; 1998 Mar; 26(2):330-42. PubMed ID: 9584440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effects of bilingualism, aging, and semantic relatedness on memory under divided attention.
Fernandes MA; Craik F; Bialystok E; Kreuger S
Can J Exp Psychol; 2007 Jun; 61(2):128-41. PubMed ID: 17665753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Dual task demands on encoding and retrieval processes: evidence from healthy adult ageing.
Logie RH; Della Sala S; MacPherson SE; Cooper J
Cortex; 2007 Jan; 43(1):159-69. PubMed ID: 17334215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Revisiting distinctive processes in memory.
Cortese MJ; Watson JM; Khanna MM; McCallion M
Psychon Bull Rev; 2006 Jun; 13(3):446-51. PubMed ID: 17048729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
