319 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27174519)
21. When does word meaning affect immediate serial recall in semantic dementia?
Jefferies E; Jones R; Bateman D; Ralph MA
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci; 2004 Mar; 4(1):20-42. PubMed ID: 15259887
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Phonological similarity in working memory span tasks.
Chow M; Macnamara BN; Conway AR
Mem Cognit; 2016 Aug; 44(6):937-49. PubMed ID: 27048510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Phonological and semantic information in adults' orthographic learning.
Chalmers KA; Burt JS
Acta Psychol (Amst); 2008 May; 128(1):162-75. PubMed ID: 18234152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. The interaction of concreteness and phonological similarity in verbal working memory.
Acheson DJ; Postle BR; Macdonald MC
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2010 Jan; 36(1):17-36. PubMed ID: 20053042
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Phonological encoding is not contingent on semantic feature retrieval: an electrophysiological study on object naming.
Abdel Rahman R; van Turennout M; Levelt WJ
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2003 Sep; 29(5):850-60. PubMed ID: 14516218
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Semantic processing and memory for attended and unattended words in dichotic listening: behavioral and electrophysiological evidence.
Bentin S; Kutas M; Hillyard SA
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1995 Feb; 21(1):54-67. PubMed ID: 7707033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Evidence for the use of assembled phonology in accessing the meaning of printed words.
Lesch MF; Pollatsek A
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1998 May; 24(3):573-92. PubMed ID: 9606928
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Exploring the role of attention during memory retrieval: effects of semantic encoding and divided attention.
Lozito JP; Mulligan NW
Mem Cognit; 2006 Jul; 34(5):986-98. PubMed ID: 17128598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. The drawing effect: Evidence for reliable and robust memory benefits in free recall.
Wammes JD; Meade ME; Fernandes MA
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2016; 69(9):1752-76. PubMed ID: 26444654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Dissociating word stem completion and cued recall as a function of divided attention at retrieval.
Clarke AJ; Butler LT
Memory; 2008 Oct; 16(7):763-72. PubMed ID: 18720222
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. tDCS to temporoparietal cortex during familiarisation enhances the subsequent phonological coherence of nonwords in immediate serial recall.
Savill N; Ashton J; Gugliuzza J; Poole C; Sim Z; Ellis AW; Jefferies E
Cortex; 2015 Feb; 63():132-44. PubMed ID: 25282052
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Phonological learning in semantic dementia.
Jefferies E; Bott S; Ehsan S; Lambon Ralph MA
Neuropsychologia; 2011 Apr; 49(5):1208-1218. PubMed ID: 21277879
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. When does length cause the word length effect?
Jalbert A; Neath I; Bireta TJ; Surprenant AM
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2011 Mar; 37(2):338-53. PubMed ID: 21171805
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Phonological and semantic priming: evidence for task-independent effects.
Rouibah A; Tiberghien G; Lupker SJ
Mem Cognit; 1999 May; 27(3):422-37. PubMed ID: 10355233
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Lexical integration of novel words without sleep.
Lindsay S; Gaskell MG
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2013 Mar; 39(2):608-22. PubMed ID: 22774854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Serial and free recall in children can be improved by training: evidence for the importance of phonological and semantic representations in immediate memory tasks.
Melby-Lervåg M; Hulme C
Psychol Sci; 2010 Nov; 21(11):1694-700. PubMed ID: 20921571
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Lexical factors in conceptual processes: The relationship between semantic representations and their corresponding phonological and orthographic lexical forms.
Peleg O; Edelist L; Eviatar Z; Bergerbest D
Mem Cognit; 2016 May; 44(4):519-37. PubMed ID: 26637339
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Interfering with memory for faces: The cost of doing two things at once.
Wammes JD; Fernandes MA
Memory; 2016; 24(2):184-203. PubMed ID: 25621412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Negative priming in free recall reconsidered.
Hanczakowski M; Beaman CP; Jones DM
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2016 May; 42(5):686-99. PubMed ID: 26595066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. The effects of concurrent cognitive load on phonological processing in adults who stutter.
Jones RM; Fox RA; Jacewicz E
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2012 Dec; 55(6):1862-75. PubMed ID: 22562825
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
