275 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27174655)
1. Task-switch costs subsequent to cue-only trials.
Swainson R; Martin D; Prosser L
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2017 Aug; 70(8):1453-1470. PubMed ID: 27174655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. More attention to attention? An eye-tracking investigation of selection of perceptual attributes during a task switch.
Longman CS; Lavric A; Monsell S
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2013 Jul; 39(4):1142-51. PubMed ID: 23088543
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The role of preparation and cue-modality in crossmodal task switching.
Lukas S; Philipp AM; Koch I
Acta Psychol (Amst); 2010 Jul; 134(3):318-22. PubMed ID: 20398881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The interplay of crossmodal attentional preparation and modality compatibility in cued task switching.
Fintor E; Stephan DN; Koch I
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2019 Apr; 72(4):955-965. PubMed ID: 29642783
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Preparing a task is sufficient to generate a subsequent task-switch cost affecting task performance.
Swainson R; Prosser LJ; Yamaguchi M
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2024 Jan; 50(1):39-51. PubMed ID: 37498704
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The effect of performing versus preparing a task on the subsequent switch cost.
Swainson R; Prosser L; Karavasilev K; Romanczuk A
Psychol Res; 2021 Feb; 85(1):364-383. PubMed ID: 31624918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Switching, plasticity, and prediction in a saccadic task-switch paradigm.
Barton JJ; Greenzang C; Hefter R; Edelman J; Manoach DS
Exp Brain Res; 2006 Jan; 168(1-2):76-87. PubMed ID: 16096781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Task-switching performance with 1:1 and 2:1 cue-task mappings: not so different after all.
Schneider DW; Logan GD
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2011 Mar; 37(2):405-15. PubMed ID: 21299334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. You can't always get what you want: the influence of unexpected task constraint on voluntary task switching.
Weaver SM; Foxe JJ; Shpaner M; Wylie GR
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2014; 67(11):2247-59. PubMed ID: 24916773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. No-go trials can modulate switch cost by interfering with effects of task preparation.
Lenartowicz A; Yeung N; Cohen JD
Psychol Res; 2011 Jan; 75(1):66-76. PubMed ID: 20473686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Distinct neurophysiological mechanisms mediate mixing costs and switch costs.
Wylie GR; Murray MM; Javitt DC; Foxe JJ
J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 Jan; 21(1):105-18. PubMed ID: 18476759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. ERPs dissociate the effects of switching task sets and task cues.
Nicholson R; Karayanidis F; Bumak E; Poboka D; Michie PT
Brain Res; 2006 Jun; 1095(1):107-23. PubMed ID: 16714004
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Electrophysiological correlates of residual switch costs.
Gajewski PD; Kleinsorge T; Falkenstein M
Cortex; 2010 Oct; 46(9):1138-48. PubMed ID: 19717147
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Task alternation cost without task alternation: measuring intentionality.
Yehene E; Meiran N; Soroker N
Neuropsychologia; 2005; 43(13):1858-69. PubMed ID: 16168729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Task switching and shifting between stopping and going: Developmental change in between-trial control adjustments.
Huizinga M; van der Molen MW
J Exp Child Psychol; 2011 Mar; 108(3):484-503. PubMed ID: 21092983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Short cue presentations encourage advance task preparation: a recipe to diminish the residual switch cost.
Verbruggen F; Liefooghe B; Vandierendonck A; Demanet J
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2007 Mar; 33(2):342-56. PubMed ID: 17352616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Modality and task switching interactions using bi-modal and bivalent stimuli.
Sandhu R; Dyson BJ
Brain Cogn; 2013 Jun; 82(1):90-9. PubMed ID: 23524240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The role of response requirements in task switching: dissolving the residue.
Wylie GR; Javitt DC; Foxe JJ
Neuroreport; 2004 Apr; 15(6):1079-87. PubMed ID: 15076739
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Cognitive control in cued task switching with transition cues: cue processing, task processing, and cue-task transition congruency.
Van Loy B; Liefooghe B; Vandierendonck A
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2010 Oct; 63(10):1916-35. PubMed ID: 20574933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Cue-switch costs in task-switching: cue priming or control processes?
Grange JA; Houghton G
Psychol Res; 2010 Sep; 74(5):481-90. PubMed ID: 20037766
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
