These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27175816)
21. Biomechanical effect of constraint in lumbar total disc replacement: a study with finite element analysis. Chung SK; Kim YE; Wang KC Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 May; 34(12):1281-6. PubMed ID: 19455003 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Shear force allowance in lumbar spine under follower load in neutral standing posture. Kim K; Kim YH; Lee S Acta Bioeng Biomech; 2010; 12(4):49-53. PubMed ID: 21361256 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Biomechanical comparison of effects of the Dynesys and Coflex dynamic stabilization systems on range of motion and loading characteristics in the lumbar spine: a finite element study. Kulduk A; Altun NS; Senkoylu A Int J Med Robot; 2015 Dec; 11(4):400-5. PubMed ID: 25643936 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Prediction of bone strength by μCT and MDCT-based finite-element-models: how much spatial resolution is needed? Bauer JS; Sidorenko I; Mueller D; Baum T; Issever AS; Eckstein F; Rummeny EJ; Link TM; Raeth CW Eur J Radiol; 2014 Jan; 83(1):e36-42. PubMed ID: 24274992 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Application of an asymmetric finite element model of the C2-T1 cervical spine for evaluating the role of soft tissues in stability. Erbulut DU; Zafarparandeh I; Lazoglu I; Ozer AF Med Eng Phys; 2014 Jul; 36(7):915-21. PubMed ID: 24641811 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Effect of load position on muscle forces, internal loads and stability of the human spine in upright postures. El-Rich M; Shirazi-Adl A Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2005 Dec; 8(6):359-68. PubMed ID: 16393873 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Loading along the lumbar spine as influence by speed, control, load magnitude, and handle height during pushing. Marras WS; Knapik GG; Ferguson S Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2009 Feb; 24(2):155-63. PubMed ID: 19111950 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Numerical analysis of models of the standard TSRH spinal instrumentation: effect of rod cross-sectional shape. Cui Y; Lewis G; Qi G Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2002 Feb; 5(1):75-80. PubMed ID: 12186736 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Biomechanics of the aging spine. Board D; Stemper BD; Yoganandan N; Pintar FA; Shender B; Paskoff G Biomed Sci Instrum; 2006; 42():1-6. PubMed ID: 16817576 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. The effect of soft tissue properties on spinal flexibility in scoliosis: biomechanical simulation of fulcrum bending. Little JP; Adam CJ Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Jan; 34(2):E76-82. PubMed ID: 19139657 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Comparative finite element analysis of the first thoracic vertebra in artiodactyls. Schüler S; Sharp AC; Nyakatura JA J Morphol; 2024 May; 285(5):e21695. PubMed ID: 38695520 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Effect of spacer diameter of the Dynesys dynamic stabilization system on the biomechanics of the lumbar spine: a finite element analysis. Shih SL; Chen CS; Lin HM; Huang LY; Liu CL; Huang CH; Cheng CK J Spinal Disord Tech; 2012 Jul; 25(5):E140-9. PubMed ID: 22744611 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Realistic loading conditions for upper body bending. Rohlmann A; Zander T; Rao M; Bergmann G J Biomech; 2009 May; 42(7):884-90. PubMed ID: 19268291 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Biological-data-based finite-element stress analysis of mandibular bone with implant-supported overdenture. Shigemitsu R; Yoda N; Ogawa T; Kawata T; Gunji Y; Yamakawa Y; Ikeda K; Sasaki K Comput Biol Med; 2014 Nov; 54():44-52. PubMed ID: 25212117 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. In vivo assessment of lumbar vertebral strength in elderly women using computed tomography-based nonlinear finite element model. Imai K; Ohnishi I; Yamamoto S; Nakamura K Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Jan; 33(1):27-32. PubMed ID: 18165745 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Investigation of optimal follower load path generated by trunk muscle coordination. Kim K; Kim YH; Lee S J Biomech; 2011 May; 44(8):1614-7. PubMed ID: 21453921 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Influence prediction of injury and vibration on adjacent components of spine using finite element methods. Guo LX; Teo EC J Spinal Disord Tech; 2006 Apr; 19(2):118-24. PubMed ID: 16760786 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Search for critical loading condition of the spine--a meta analysis of a nonlinear viscoelastic finite element model. Wang JL; Shirazi-Adl A; Parnianpour M Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2005 Oct; 8(5):323-30. PubMed ID: 16298854 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Simulation of inhomogeneous rather than homogeneous poroelastic tissue material properties within disc annulus and nucleus better predicts cervical spine response: a C3-T1 finite element model analysis under compression and moment loadings. Hussain M; Natarajan RN; Chaudhary G; An HS; Andersson GB Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2011 Feb; 36(4):E245-55. PubMed ID: 21270714 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]