163 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27177281)
1. Improved Detection Rate of Ovarian Cancer Using a 2-Step Triage Model of the Risk of Malignancy Index and Expert Sonography in an Outpatient Screening Setting.
Manegold-Brauer G; Buechel J; Knipprath-Mészaros A; Schoetzau A; Hacker NF; Tercanli S; Lapaire O; Heinzelmann-Schwarz V
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2016 Jul; 26(6):1062-9. PubMed ID: 27177281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of risk of malignancy index (RMI), CA125, CA 19-9, ultrasound score, and menopausal status in borderline ovarian tumor.
Alanbay I; Akturk E; Coksuer H; Ercan M; Karaşahin E; Dede M; Yenen MC; Ozan H; Baser I
Gynecol Endocrinol; 2012 Jun; 28(6):478-82. PubMed ID: 22122561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Preoperative evaluation and triage of women with suspicious adnexal masses using risk of malignancy index.
Enakpene CA; Omigbodun AO; Goecke TW; Odukogbe AT; Beckmann MW
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2009 Feb; 35(1):131-8. PubMed ID: 19215560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Preoperative multimodal strategies for risk assessment of adnexal masses: analysis of 1362 cases in a gynecologic cancer center.
Radosa MP; Camara O; Vorwergk J; Diebolder H; Winzer H; Mothes A; Gajda M; Runnebaum IB
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2011 Aug; 21(6):1056-62. PubMed ID: 21633301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Risk of malignancy index in preoperative evaluation of pelvic masses.
Ashrafgangooei T; Rezaeezadeh M
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2011; 12(7):1727-30. PubMed ID: 22126553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A prospective study to evaluate the risk malignancy index and its diagnostic implication in patients with suspected ovarian mass.
Dora SK; Dandapat AB; Pande B; Hota JP
J Ovarian Res; 2017 Aug; 10(1):55. PubMed ID: 28806987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of risk of malignancy indices; RMI 1-4 in borderline ovarian tumor.
Yenen MC; Alanbay I; Aktürk E; Ercan CM; Coksuer H; Karaşahin E; Ozan H; Dede M
Eur J Gynaecol Oncol; 2012; 33(2):168-73. PubMed ID: 22611957
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The risk of malignancy index in discrimination of adnexal masses.
Ulusoy S; Akbayir O; Numanoglu C; Ulusoy N; Odabas E; Gulkilik A
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2007 Mar; 96(3):186-91. PubMed ID: 17280665
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Risk of malignancy index used as a diagnostic tool in a tertiary centre for patients with a pelvic mass.
Håkansson F; Høgdall EV; Nedergaard L; Lundvall L; Engelholm SA; Pedersen AT; Hartwell D; Høgdall C;
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2012 Apr; 91(4):496-502. PubMed ID: 22229703
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. CEA in evaluation of adnexal mass: retrospective cohort analysis and review of the literature.
Sagi-Dain L; Lavie O; Auslander R; Sagi S
Int J Biol Markers; 2015 Nov; 30(4):e394-400. PubMed ID: 26109367
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of two malignancy risk indices based on serum CA125, ultrasound score and menopausal status in the diagnosis of ovarian masses.
Morgante G; la Marca A; Ditto A; De Leo V
Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1999 Jun; 106(6):524-7. PubMed ID: 10426607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A risk of malignancy index in preoperative diagnosis of ovarian cancer.
Ma S; Shen K; Lang J
Chin Med J (Engl); 2003 Mar; 116(3):396-9. PubMed ID: 12781045
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Risk of malignancy index for referral of ovarian cancer cases to a tertiary center: does it identify the correct cases?
Bailey J; Tailor A; Naik R; Lopes A; Godfrey K; Hatem HM; Monaghan J
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2006; 16 Suppl 1():30-4. PubMed ID: 16515564
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Pre-operative evaluation of ovarian tumors by risk of malignancy index, CA125 and ultrasound.
Arun-Muthuvel V; Jaya V
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2014; 15(6):2929-32. PubMed ID: 24761927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluation of a risk of malignancy index based on serum CA125, ultrasound findings and menopausal status in the pre-operative diagnosis of pelvic masses.
Tingulstad S; Hagen B; Skjeldestad FE; Onsrud M; Kiserud T; Halvorsen T; Nustad K
Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1996 Aug; 103(8):826-31. PubMed ID: 8760716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The accuracy of risk malignancy index in prediction of malignancy in women with adnexal mass in Basrah, Iraq.
Al-Asadi JN; Al-Maliki SK; Al-Dahhhan F; Al-Naama L; Suood F
Niger J Clin Pract; 2018 Oct; 21(10):1254-1259. PubMed ID: 30297555
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Triage of ovarian masses.
Chia YN; Marsden DE; Robertson G; Hacker NF
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2008 Jun; 48(3):322-8. PubMed ID: 18532966
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluation of the risk malignancy index diagnostic value in patients with adnexal masses.
Terzić M; Dotlić J; Ladjević IL; Atanacković J; Ladjević N
Vojnosanit Pregl; 2011 Jul; 68(7):589-93. PubMed ID: 21899180
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluation of the Risk of Malignancy Index in daily clinical management of adnexal masses.
van den Akker PA; Aalders AL; Snijders MP; Kluivers KB; Samlal RA; Vollebergh JH; Massuger LF
Gynecol Oncol; 2010 Mar; 116(3):384-8. PubMed ID: 19959215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Ovarian fibroma/fibrothecoma: retrospective cohort study shows limited value of risk of malignancy index score.
Numanoglu C; Kuru O; Sakinci M; Akbayır O; Ulker V
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2013 Jun; 53(3):287-92. PubMed ID: 23611791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
