These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

86 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27177389)

  • 21. Differences in short-term training for interaural phase difference discrimination between two different forced-choice paradigms.
    King A; Hopkins K; Plack CJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Oct; 134(4):2635-8. PubMed ID: 24116401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Detectability and criterion measures in temporal generalization.
    Wearden JH
    Behav Processes; 2008 Jul; 78(3):374-9. PubMed ID: 18329824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Age slowing down in detection and visual discrimination under varying presentation times.
    Moret-Tatay C; Lemus-Zúñiga LG; Tortosa DA; Gamermann D; Vázquez-Martínez A; Navarro-Pardo E; Conejero JA
    Scand J Psychol; 2017 Aug; 58(4):304-311. PubMed ID: 28670767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Spatial four-alternative forced-choice method is the preferred psychophysical method for naïve observers.
    Jäkel F; Wichmann FA
    J Vis; 2006 Nov; 6(11):1307-22. PubMed ID: 17209737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Discriminating famous from fictional names based on lifetime experience: evidence in support of a signal-detection model based on finite mixture distributions.
    Bowles B; Harlow IM; Meeking MM; Köhler S
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2012 Jan; 38(1):78-91. PubMed ID: 21910561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. A cautionary note on the use of the adaptive up-down method.
    García-Pérez MA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Oct; 130(4):2098-107. PubMed ID: 21973364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Developing Bayesian adaptive methods for estimating sensitivity thresholds (d') in Yes-No and forced-choice tasks.
    Lesmes LA; Lu ZL; Baek J; Tran N; Dosher BA; Albright TD
    Front Psychol; 2015; 6():1070. PubMed ID: 26300798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. [Effect of noise in submarine compartment on signal discrimination and arithmetic performance].
    Hu Z; Liang Z; Shi X; Tang Z
    Space Med Med Eng (Beijing); 1997 Jun; 10(3):214-6. PubMed ID: 11540575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Signal Detection Measures Cannot Distinguish Perceptual Biases from Response Biases.
    Witt JK; Taylor JE; Sugovic M; Wixted JT
    Perception; 2015 Mar; 44(3):289-300. PubMed ID: 26562253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Interval bias in 2AFC detection tasks: sorting out the artifacts.
    García-Pérez MA; Alcalá-Quintana R
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2011 Oct; 73(7):2332-52. PubMed ID: 21735314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Experimental Pain Is Alleviated by Manual Traction Itself Rather than Subjective Bias in the Knee: A Signal Detection Analysis.
    Shigetoh H; Osumi M; Morioka S
    Pain Med; 2019 Jul; 20(7):1347-1354. PubMed ID: 30649492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Microstimulation of extrastriate area MST influences performance on a direction discrimination task.
    Celebrini S; Newsome WT
    J Neurophysiol; 1995 Feb; 73(2):437-48. PubMed ID: 7760110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Quantifying stimulus discriminability: a comparison of information theory and ideal observer analysis.
    Thomson EE; Kristan WB
    Neural Comput; 2005 Apr; 17(4):741-78. PubMed ID: 15829089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Subjects adjust criterion on errors in perceptual decision tasks.
    Killeen PR; Taylor TJ; Treviño M
    Psychol Rev; 2018 Jan; 125(1):117-130. PubMed ID: 29345482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Human brain regions involved in direction discrimination.
    Cornette L; Dupont P; Rosier A; Sunaert S; Van Hecke P; Michiels J; Mortelmans L; Orban GA
    J Neurophysiol; 1998 May; 79(5):2749-65. PubMed ID: 9582242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Differences in evoked potentials during the active processing of sound location and motion.
    Richter N; Schröger E; Rübsamen R
    Neuropsychologia; 2013 Jun; 51(7):1204-14. PubMed ID: 23499852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Intramuscular sensation in conscious human subjects: a qualitative and quantitative study utilizing signal detection theory methodology.
    Murphy B; Dawson N; Irwin RJ
    Somatosens Mot Res; 2002; 19(3):181-90. PubMed ID: 12396574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Task-dependent changes of the psychophysical motion-tuning functions in the course of perceptual learning.
    Koyama S; Harner A; Watanabe T
    Perception; 2004; 33(9):1139-47. PubMed ID: 15560512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Being confident without seeing: what subjective measures of visual consciousness are about.
    Zehetleitner M; Rausch M
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2013 Oct; 75(7):1406-26. PubMed ID: 23868563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Bimodal sensory discrimination is finer than dual single modality discrimination.
    Koene A; Arnold D; Johnston A
    J Vis; 2007 Aug; 7(11):14.1-11. PubMed ID: 17997668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.