These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

256 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27177872)

  • 1. Missing the Party: Political Categorization and Reasoning in the Absence of Party Label Cues.
    Heit E; Nicholson SP
    Top Cogn Sci; 2016 Jul; 8(3):697-714. PubMed ID: 27177872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Constituents of political cognition: Race, party politics, and the alliance detection system.
    Pietraszewski D; Curry OS; Petersen MB; Cosmides L; Tooby J
    Cognition; 2015 Jul; 140():24-39. PubMed ID: 25867997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Polarizing cues.
    Nicholson SP
    Am J Pol Sci; 2012; 56(1):52-66. PubMed ID: 22400143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Wishful thinking in the 2008 U.S. presidential election.
    Krizan Z; Miller JC; Johar O
    Psychol Sci; 2010 Jan; 21(1):140-6. PubMed ID: 20424035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The impact of personality on cognitive, behavioral, and affective political processes: the effects of need to evaluate.
    Bizer GY; Krosnick JA; Holbrook AL; Wheeler SC; Rucker DD; Petty RE
    J Pers; 2004 Oct; 72(5):995-1027. PubMed ID: 15335335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Wishful thinking impairs belief-desire reasoning: a case of decoupling failure in adults?
    Harvey N
    Cognition; 1992 Nov; 45(2):141-62. PubMed ID: 1451413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. More Polarized but More Independent: Political Party Identification and Ideological Self-Categorization Among U.S. Adults, College Students, and Late Adolescents, 1970-2015.
    Twenge JM; Honeycutt N; Prislin R; Sherman RA
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2016 Oct; 42(10):1364-83. PubMed ID: 27604353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Perceiving political polarization in the United States: party identity strength and attitude extremity exacerbate the perceived partisan divide.
    Westfall J; Van Boven L; Chambers JR; Judd CM
    Perspect Psychol Sci; 2015 Mar; 10(2):145-58. PubMed ID: 25910386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The use of stereotypes and individuating information in political person perception.
    Crawford JT; Jussim L; Madon S; Cain TR; Stevens ST
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2011 Apr; 37(4):529-42. PubMed ID: 21343439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Judging Political Hearts and Minds: How Political Dynamics Drive Social Judgments.
    Cornwell JF; Bajger AT; Higgins ET
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2015 Aug; 41(8):1053-68. PubMed ID: 26068717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Quantitative analysis of gender stereotypes and information aggregation in a national election.
    Tumminello M; Miccichè S; Varho J; Piilo J; Mantegna RN
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(3):e58910. PubMed ID: 23555606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Are political-opinion pollsters missing ambivalence: "I love Trump"… "I hate Trump".
    Camparo JC; Camparo LB
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(3):e0247580. PubMed ID: 33705443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A Privileged Point of View: Effects of Subjective Socioeconomic Status on Naïve Realism and Political Division.
    Brown-Iannuzzi JL; Lundberg KB; Kay AC; Payne BK
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2021 Feb; 47(2):241-256. PubMed ID: 32458734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Political party affiliation, political ideology and mortality.
    Pabayo R; Kawachi I; Muennig P
    J Epidemiol Community Health; 2015 May; 69(5):423-31. PubMed ID: 25631861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Science beliefs, political ideology, and cognitive sophistication.
    Pennycook G; Bago B; McPhetres J
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2023 Jan; 152(1):80-97. PubMed ID: 35925740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Politics, moral reasoning and the Defining Issues Test: a reply to Barnett et al. (1995).
    Emler N; Palmer-Canton E; St James A
    Br J Soc Psychol; 1998 Dec; 37 ( Pt 4)():457-76. PubMed ID: 9933911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Falling through the cracks: Modeling the formation of social category boundaries.
    Yang VC; van der Does T; Olsson H
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(3):e0247562. PubMed ID: 33788844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Politicization as an antecedent of polarization: Evidence from two different political and national contexts.
    Simon B; Reininger KM; Schaefer CD; Zitzmann S; Krys S
    Br J Soc Psychol; 2019 Oct; 58(4):769-785. PubMed ID: 30556187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Using a natural experiment to estimate the electoral consequences of terrorist attacks.
    Balcells L; Torrats-Espinosa G
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2018 Oct; 115(42):10624-10629. PubMed ID: 30279183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The multidimensional politics of inequality: taking stock of identity politics in the U.S. Presidential election of 2016.
    McCall L; Orloff AS
    Br J Sociol; 2017 Nov; 68 Suppl 1():S34-S56. PubMed ID: 29114864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.