These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27178521)

  • 41. Evaluation of click-evoked oto-acoustic emissions in the newborn.
    Stevens JC; Webb HD; Hutchinson J; Connell J; Smith MF; Buffin JT
    Br J Audiol; 1991 Feb; 25(1):11-4. PubMed ID: 2012898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Newborn hearing screening in the NICU: profile of failed auditory brainstem response/passed otoacoustic emission.
    Berg AL; Spitzer JB; Towers HM; Bartosiewicz C; Diamond BE
    Pediatrics; 2005 Oct; 116(4):933-8. PubMed ID: 16199704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. [Results of an audiologic screening in Liguria].
    Navone C
    Minerva Pediatr; 2007 Oct; 59(5):461-2. PubMed ID: 17947870
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Comparison of two-step transient evoked otoacoustic emissions (TEOAE) and automated auditory brainstem response (AABR) for universal newborn hearing screening programs.
    Benito-Orejas JI; Ramírez B; Morais D; Almaraz A; Fernández-Calvo JL
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2008 Aug; 72(8):1193-201. PubMed ID: 18550180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. The Bradford and Airedale baby hearing project. An assessment of the impact of screening on the earlier detection of infant hearing loss.
    Comerford DG; Watson C; Khan MS; Hussain SS
    Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci; 1995 Dec; 20(6):536-9. PubMed ID: 8665714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. When should automatic Auditory Brainstem Response test be used for newborn hearing screening?
    Unlu I; Guclu E; Yaman H
    Auris Nasus Larynx; 2015 Jun; 42(3):199-202. PubMed ID: 25459495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. [Screening project of identification of hearing deficits in newborns].
    Møller TR; Jensen FK; Ekmann A; Wetke R; Ovesen T
    Ugeskr Laeger; 2007 Mar; 169(10):900-3. PubMed ID: 17359732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. [Evoked otoacoustic emissions in the newborn].
    François M
    Arch Pediatr; 1999; 6 Suppl 2():351s-352s. PubMed ID: 10370533
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Hearing loss in children in Østfold county 2000-09.
    Nelson S; Andersen R; Anderssen SH
    Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2015 Jan; 135(2):132-6. PubMed ID: 25625991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Hearing status in neonatal hyperbilirubinemia by auditory brain stem evoked response and transient evoked otoacoustic emission.
    Baradaranfar MH; Atighechi S; Dadgarnia MH; Jafari R; Karimi G; Mollasadeghi A; Eslami Z; Baradarnfar A
    Acta Med Iran; 2011; 49(2):109-12. PubMed ID: 21598220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Summary of the National Institutes of Health Consensus: early identification of hearing impairment in infants and young children.
    Am J Otol; 1994 Mar; 15(2):130-1. PubMed ID: 8172290
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. [Audiology characteristics in newborns and infants who failed in the hearing screening by transiently evoked otoacoustic emissions: 89 cases study].
    Huang LH; Deng XQ; Yang YL; Wang SJ; Tang XQ; Guo LS; Han DM
    Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2011 Mar; 46(3):195-200. PubMed ID: 21575409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. [Universal neonatal screening as an application of automated audiological techniques].
    Delb W
    HNO; 2003 Dec; 51(12):962-5. PubMed ID: 14647924
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. [Newborn hearing screening results at Zeynep Kamil Women and Children Diseases Education and Research Hospital].
    Kucur C; Kınış V; Ozdem S; Kucur SK
    Kulak Burun Bogaz Ihtis Derg; 2012; 22(1):38-42. PubMed ID: 22339567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Regarding "Otoacoustic Emissions in Rural Nicaragua: Cost Analysis and Implications for Newborn Hearing Screening".
    Pulimoottil DT; Padmanabhan K
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2018 Jan; 158(1):197. PubMed ID: 29297270
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. [Evoked otoacoustic emissions at birth: the Luxembourg experience].
    Panosetti E; Shi BX; Eloy JP; Orband D; Rasque E
    Arch Pediatr; 1999; 6 Suppl 2():353s-355s. PubMed ID: 10370534
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. [The audiological characteristics of infants failed in hearing screening].
    Wen R; Li Y; Luo R; Wang X
    Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2009 Oct; 23(19):865-8, 871. PubMed ID: 20120868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. A multisite study to examine the efficacy of the otoacoustic emission/automated auditory brainstem response newborn hearing screening protocol: results of visual reinforcement audiometry.
    Widen JE; Johnson JL; White KR; Gravel JS; Vohr BR; James M; Kennalley T; Maxon AB; Spivak L; Sullivan-Mahoney M; Weirather Y; Meyer S
    Am J Audiol; 2005 Dec; 14(2):S200-16. PubMed ID: 16489864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Identification of neonatal hearing impairment: a multicenter investigation.
    Norton SJ; Gorga MP; Widen JE; Folsom RC; Sininger Y; Cone-Wesson B; Vohr BR; Fletcher KA
    Ear Hear; 2000 Oct; 21(5):348-56. PubMed ID: 11059697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Universal neonatal hearing screening: the Siena (Italy) experience on 19,700 newborns.
    De Capua B; Costantini D; Martufi C; Latini G; Gentile M; De Felice C
    Early Hum Dev; 2007 Sep; 83(9):601-6. PubMed ID: 17307313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.