220 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27178725)
1. Utility of PET-CT to evaluate retroperitoneal lymph node metastasis in advanced cervical cancer: Results of ACRIN6671/GOG0233 trial.
Atri M; Zhang Z; Dehdashti F; Lee SI; Ali S; Marques H; Koh WJ; Moore K; Landrum L; Kim JW; DiSilvestro P; Eisenhauer E; Schnell F; Gold M
Gynecol Oncol; 2016 Sep; 142(3):413-9. PubMed ID: 27178725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Utility of PET/CT to Evaluate Retroperitoneal Lymph Node Metastasis in High-Risk Endometrial Cancer: Results of ACRIN 6671/GOG 0233 Trial.
Atri M; Zhang Z; Dehdashti F; Lee SI; Marques H; Ali S; Koh WJ; Mannel RS; DiSilvestro P; King SA; Pearl M; Zhou X; Plante M; Moxley KM; Gold M
Radiology; 2017 May; 283(2):450-459. PubMed ID: 28051912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Identification of Distant Metastatic Disease in Uterine Cervical and Endometrial Cancers with FDG PET/CT: Analysis from the ACRIN 6671/GOG 0233 Multicenter Trial.
Gee MS; Atri M; Bandos AI; Mannel RS; Gold MA; Lee SI
Radiology; 2018 Apr; 287(1):176-184. PubMed ID: 29185901
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Usefulness of (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography to detect para-aortic lymph nodal metastasis in advanced cervical cancer with negative computed tomography findings.
Lin WC; Hung YC; Yeh LS; Kao CH; Yen RF; Shen YY
Gynecol Oncol; 2003 Apr; 89(1):73-6. PubMed ID: 12694656
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Combinative evaluation of primary tumor and lymph nodes in predicting pelvic lymphatic metastasis in early-stage cervical cancer: A multiparametric PET-CT study.
Li K; Sun H; Guo Q
Eur J Radiol; 2019 Apr; 113():153-157. PubMed ID: 30927941
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Diagnostic accuracy of preoperative
Hu J; Zhang K; Yan Y; Zang Y; Wang Y; Xue F
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2019 Sep; 300(3):519-529. PubMed ID: 31165242
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Role of integrated PET-CT in pelvic lymph node staging of cervical cancer before radical hysterectomy.
Chung HH; Park NH; Kim JW; Song YS; Chung JK; Kang SB
Gynecol Obstet Invest; 2009; 67(1):61-6. PubMed ID: 18843187
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Additional value of MR/PET fusion compared with PET/CT in the detection of lymph node metastases in cervical cancer patients.
Kim SK; Choi HJ; Park SY; Lee HY; Seo SS; Yoo CW; Jung DC; Kang S; Cho KS
Eur J Cancer; 2009 Aug; 45(12):2103-9. PubMed ID: 19403303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9.
Mayoral M; Paredes P; Domènech B; Fusté P; Vidal-Sicart S; Tapias A; Torné A; Pahisa J; Ordi J; Pons F; Lomeña F
Rev Esp Med Nucl Imagen Mol; 2017; 36(1):20-26. PubMed ID: 27667001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [
Adam JA; van Diepen PR; Mom CH; Stoker J; van Eck-Smit BLF; Bipat S
Gynecol Oncol; 2020 Nov; 159(2):588-596. PubMed ID: 32921477
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Preliminary report of using FDG-PET to detect extrapelvic lesions in cervical cancer patients with enlarged pelvic lymph nodes on MRI/CT.
Tsai CS; Chang TC; Lai CH; Tsai CC; Ng KK; Hsueh S; Yen TC; Hong JH
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2004 Apr; 58(5):1506-12. PubMed ID: 15050330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Selection of patients with advanced-stage cervical cancer for para-aortic lymphadenectomy in the era of PET/CT.
Margulies AL; Peres A; Barranger E; Perreti I; Brouland JF; Toubet E; Sarda-Mantel LE; Thoury A; Chis C; Walker F; Luton D; Delpech Y; Koskas M
Anticancer Res; 2013 Jan; 33(1):283-6. PubMed ID: 23267158
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Detecting para-aortic lymph nodal metastasis by positron emission tomography of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose in advanced cervical cancer with negative magnetic resonance imaging findings.
Yeh LS; Hung YC; Shen YY; Kao CH; Lin CC; Lee CC
Oncol Rep; 2002; 9(6):1289-92. PubMed ID: 12375036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Robot-assisted laparoscopic transperitoneal infrarenal lymphadenectomy in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer by single docking: Do we need a backup procedure?
Gucer F; Misirlioglu S; Ceydeli N; Taskiran C
J Robot Surg; 2018 Mar; 12(1):49-58. PubMed ID: 28255734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of the accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging and positron emission tomography/computed tomography in the presurgical detection of lymph node metastases in patients with uterine cervical carcinoma: a prospective study.
Choi HJ; Roh JW; Seo SS; Lee S; Kim JY; Kim SK; Kang KW; Lee JS; Jeong JY; Park SY
Cancer; 2006 Feb; 106(4):914-22. PubMed ID: 16411226
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Prediction model for para-aortic lymph node metastasis in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer.
Shim SH; Kim DY; Lee SJ; Kim SN; Kang SB; Lee SW; Park JY; Suh DS; Kim JH; Kim YM; Kim YT; Nam JH
Gynecol Oncol; 2017 Jan; 144(1):40-45. PubMed ID: 27855989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Role of magnetic resonance imaging and positron emission tomography/computed tomography in preoperative lymph node detection of uterine cervical cancer.
Chung HH; Kang KW; Cho JY; Kim JW; Park NH; Song YS; Kim SH; Chung JK; Kang SB
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2010 Aug; 203(2):156.e1-5. PubMed ID: 20435285
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Accuracy of F-18 FDG PET/CT with optimal cut-offs of maximum standardized uptake value according to size for diagnosis of regional lymph node metastasis in patients with rectal cancer.
Bae SU; Won KS; Song BI; Jeong WK; Baek SK; Kim HW
Cancer Imaging; 2018 Sep; 18(1):32. PubMed ID: 30217167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Diagnostic accuracy of F-18 FDG PET or PET/CT for detection of lymph node metastasis in clinically node negative head and neck cancer patients; A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Kim SJ; Pak K; Kim K
Am J Otolaryngol; 2019; 40(2):297-305. PubMed ID: 30473166
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Laparoscopic extended pelvic lymph node (LN) dissection as validation of the performance of [(11) C]-acetate positron emission tomography/computer tomography in the detection of LN metastasis in intermediate- and high-risk prostate cancer.
Daouacher G; von Below C; Gestblom C; Ahlström H; Grzegorek R; Wassberg C; Sörensen J; Waldén M
BJU Int; 2016 Jul; 118(1):77-83. PubMed ID: 26074275
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
