242 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27179120)
41. DETERMINING THE DOSE RATE DEPENDENCE OF DIFFERENT ACTIVE PERSONAL DOSEMETERS IN STANDARDIZED PULSED AND CONTINUOUS RADIATION FIELDS.
Hupe O; Friedrich S; Vanhavere F; Brodecki M
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2019 Dec; 187(3):345-352. PubMed ID: 31504965
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Novel reference radiation fields for pulsed photon radiation installed at PTB.
Klammer J; Roth J; Hupe O
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2012 Sep; 151(3):478-82. PubMed ID: 22492821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Active personal dosemeters for individual monitoring and other new developments.
Bolognese-Milsztajn T; Ginjaume M; Luszik-Bhadra M; Vanhavere F; Wahl W; Weeks A
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2004; 112(1):141-68. PubMed ID: 15574989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. ASSESSMENT OF EYE LENS DOSES IN INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY: A SIMULATION IN LABORATORY CONDITIONS.
Čemusová Z; Ekendahl D; Judas L
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2016 Sep; 170(1-4):256-60. PubMed ID: 26224737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. EVOLUTION OF THE IEC AND EN STANDARDS FOR INDIVIDUAL MONITORING OF IONISING RADIATION.
Voytchev M; Behrens R; Ambrosi P; Radev R; Chiaro P
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2016 Sep; 170(1-4):13-6. PubMed ID: 26443545
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. A comparison of the response of PADC neutron dosemeters in high-energy neutron fields.
Trompier F; Boschung M; Buffler A; Domingo C; Cale E; Chevallier MA; Esposito A; Ferrarini M; Geduld DR; Hager L; Hohmann E; Mayer S; Musso A; Romero-Esposito M; Röttger S; Smit FD; Sashala Naik A; Tanner R; Wissmann F; Caresana M
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2014 Oct; 161(1-4):78-81. PubMed ID: 24298170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. A method for evaluating personal dosemeters in workplace with neutron fields.
de Freitas Nascimento L; Cauwels V; Vanhavere F
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2012 Apr; 149(2):159-68. PubMed ID: 21565843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. COMPARISON OF DIFFERENT PADC MATERIALS AND ETCHING CONDITIONS FOR FAST NEUTRON DOSIMETRY.
Assenmacher F; Boschung M; Hohmann E; Mayer S
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2016 Sep; 170(1-4):162-7. PubMed ID: 26443546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. HOW DO HOSPITAL STERILISATION PROCEDURES AFFECT THE RESPONSE OF PERSONAL EXTREMITY RINGS AND OF EYE LENS TL DOSEMETERS?
Kopeć R; Bubak A; Budzanowski M; Sas-Bieniarz A; Szumska A
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2016 Sep; 170(1-4):302-6. PubMed ID: 26868010
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. EDEL: ENEA DOSEMETER FOR EYE LENS.
Ferrari P; Mariotti F; Campani L
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2016 Sep; 170(1-4):145-9. PubMed ID: 26170436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING WITH PASSIVE DETECTORS AT CTN IN PORTUGAL.
Pereira MF; Pereira J; Rangel S; Saraiva M; Santos LM; Cardoso JV; Alves JG
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2016 Sep; 170(1-4):342-5. PubMed ID: 26598737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Simulation studies on a prototype ionisation chamber for measurement of personal dose equivalent, Hp(10).
Cardoso J; Carvalho AF; Oliveira C
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2007; 125(1-4):175-9. PubMed ID: 17567764
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. DEVELOPMENT OF SIMULATED WORKPLACE FIELDS AT KRISS FOR PERFORMANCE TEST OF NEUTRON PERSONAL DOSEMETERS.
Kim J; Park H; Kim Y
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2016 Sep; 170(1-4):63-6. PubMed ID: 26541186
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Characterisation of neutron fields: challenges in assessing the directional distribution.
Cauwels V; Vanhavere F; Reginatto M
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2014 Oct; 161(1-4):335-8. PubMed ID: 24966340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. CIEMAT EXTERNAL DOSIMETRY SERVICE: ISO/IEC 17025 ACCREDITATION AND 3 Y OF OPERATIONAL EXPERIENCE AS AN ACCREDITED LABORATORY.
Romero AM; Rodríguez R; López JL; Martín R; Benavente JF
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2016 Sep; 170(1-4):70-3. PubMed ID: 26567323
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Development of a new electronic personal neutron dosemeter using a CMOS active pixel sensor.
Trocmé M; Higueret S; Husson D; Nourreddine A; Lê TD
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2007; 126(1-4):536-40. PubMed ID: 17576655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. DOSE MEASUREMENT PRECISION OF AN RPLD-BASED EYE LENS DOSEMETER APPLICABLE TO THE MEDICAL SECTOR.
Kowatari M; Nagamoto K; Nakagami K; Yoshitomi H; Moritake T; Kunugita N
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2022 Oct; 198(17):1303-1312. PubMed ID: 35909091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. ISO 4037:2019 VALIDATION OF RADIATION QUALITIES BY MEANS OF HALF-VALUE LAYER AND HP(10) DOSIMETRY.
Bandalo V; Greiter MB; Brönner J; Hoedlmoser H
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2019 Dec; 187(4):438-450. PubMed ID: 31650180
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Air kerma to dose equivalent conversion coefficients not included in ISO 4037-3.
Behrens R
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2011 Nov; 147(3):373-9. PubMed ID: 21156781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Hp(0.07) photon irradiations at Seibersdorf for the EURADOS extremity dosemeter intercomparison 2009.
Stadtmann H; Hranitzky C
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2011 Mar; 144(1-4):306-9. PubMed ID: 21208935
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
